Hockinson resident Carolyn Schultz-Rathbun says ‘the heart of our community is slipping slowly away’
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
Brian Hebert’s recent letter to the editor urges support for the current Hockinson School District levy because it would increase property values. But Hockinson property values have been increasing at a dizzying rate already. And for most of us, those inflated property values just mean ever-higher property taxes: over 54% higher since 2015.

Hebert suggests that rising property values strengthen our community. Let’s think about that for a moment.
Hockinson is experiencing rural gentrification, a process in which affluent people move into small towns and rural areas, get involved politically and civically, and shift civic priorities away from the needs of existing residents, toward their own wants and needs. They also, simply by moving to the area, increase property values, which in turn forces existing residents out.
The ever-higher property values levy proponents prize matter a great deal, of course, to people who sell and move on. But those folks aren’t the heart of the community.
And neither, for that matter, is HSD, although it has adopted the boilerplate “heart of the community” advertising slogan used by school districts across the state.
A comparison of OSPI’s personnel data with the Secretary of State’s registered voter database shows that over two-thirds of HSD employees live outside Hockinson.
The heart of our community are people who put down roots here. They have no plans to leave. They don’t want to leave. But the effect of skyrocketing property values, and of the resulting skyrocketing property taxes, is to keep forcing out members of our community who are on the economic margins – the old, the disabled, single moms.
I’ve watched a steady exodus over the past 10 years of friends and neighbors driven out by rising property taxes. And, ironically, rising property values make it almost impossible for our kids, educated in Hockinson schools, to settle in Hockinson and raise families here after they graduate.
A community draws its strength from its diversity. But in Hockinson those who can afford to remain are, increasingly, affluent people in their prime earning years.
The heart of our community is slipping slowly away.
Continuing to run up property values – which means continuing to force out neighbors who make less than we do – is not how we build or maintain a strong community.
We are a strong community only to the extent that we are a real community – not simply a bunch of people who live in proximity to each other, but people who know each other, care about each other, and look out for each other.
One of levy proponents’ main talking points is that a vote for the levy is a vote to increase property values. Let’s be honest about what that means. A vote for the levy is a vote for still-higher property taxes – and a vote to force out a few more of our neighbors.
Carolyn Schultz-Rathbun
Hockinson
Also read:
- Opinion: The legislature has committed $2.4 billion to recurring pension increases since 2018Six legislative COLAs have raised public employer costs by $2.38 billion since 2018, driving up unfunded pension liabilities and increasing burdens on county and city budgets.
- Opinion: ‘Just because they got away with it doesn’t mean they weren’t wrong’A Skamania County deputy’s report found violations of county rules and the Open Public Meetings Act, but no prosecutor acted on the findings.
- Opinion: Small things grow great by concordWashington’s initiative process gives citizens direct power to challenge lawmakers. Failed restrictions and new measures on girls’ sports, parental rights, and citizenship prove the influence of grassroots action.
- Opinion: California’s $20 fast food minimum wage creates less jobs and lower incomeStudy data show California fast food workers now face fewer shifts, higher menu prices, and widespread automation after the $20 wage hike.
- Opinion: State is rightly emphasizing experience and skills, not degreesElizabeth New explains how a new state policy removes unnecessary advanced degree requirements, supporting skills-based employment and broadening opportunities for capable workers.







