Gary Perman says ‘Camas can fix its mismanagement in other ways besides creating a new taxing authority’

Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com

Over the past few weeks, my inbox has been overflowing with messages from Camas and Washougal residents:

“Didn’t we already vote this down?”

“Yes we did. No still means no.”

“So why is it back on the ballot? Do they think we’re stupid?” 

The Money Trail 

The firefighters’ union is pouring serious cash and manpower into promoting this measure  and that alone should make taxpayers pause. When a special-interest group spends heavily to “educate” voters, it’s rarely about safety. It’s about securing bigger budgets and long-term control. 

You’ve probably heard the sales pitch: “It’s only the cost of a weekly cup of coffee.”

Here’s what they don’t tell you:

• Only 2% of all fire calls are actual structure fires.
• A single 2017 safety fine cost $4,800 for not having a second fire truck at a house fire – not “millions.”
• The RFA doesn’t expand coverage, add services, or hire more staff on $1.05/$1,000
• Creating the RFA adds another taxing authority, one that can (and will) raise your taxes. 

In fact, a taxpayer-funded survey found that 87% of residents are satisfied with fire services, and 90% are satisfied with EMS. Clearly, the fire system isn’t broken. 

What’s Actually Changing? 

Not the service.

Not the management.

Not the leadership.

Just the tax burden. 

Here’s what that looks like for Camas taxpayers: 

Average Camas home value: $731,000
→ $2.90 × 731 = $2,119.90 per year

The actual cost of fire services, according to the City’s Director of Finance, is $0.88 per $1,000. Yet the Council, advised by both the Director and the City Administrator, voted to return only $0.71 per $1,000  effectively creating double taxation for residents. 

Same staff. Same leadership. Same service. Higher taxes.

No increase in emergency coverage.

No expansion of services.

Same management running the show.

The only thing expanding is the government’s ability to tax you more, automatically by 1% per year, plus a likely new levy within two years of the RFA’s creation to ask you for MORE money. 

Camas can fix its mismanagement in other ways besides creating a new taxing authority.  

Gary Perman
concerned taxpayer
Camas/Washougal 

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: Inviting courts into health care policy discussion
  Elizabeth New (Hovde) warns that Senate Joint Resolution 8206 could invite lawsuits by placing vague health care mandates into Washington’s Constitution.
• 
  Opinion: 24 States In. Washington Out? $732 Million Lost?
  Vicki Murray argues Washington risks forfeiting $732 million in federal education funding if state leaders do not opt into the federal tax-credit scholarship program.
• 
  Opinion: Nationwide strike in support of illegals and opposing the rule of law?
  Lars Larson argues that a reported nationwide strike reflects opposition to immigration enforcement and the rule of law, criticizing political leaders and media coverage.
• 
  POLL: Should councilors serving on boards be required to vote the way the full council decides?
  A new poll asks whether Clark County councilors serving on boards should be required to vote in line with the full council’s position or retain independent judgment.
• 
  VIDEO: Washington lawmakers clash over bills directed at limiting ICE officers
  A heated House committee hearing on legislation aimed at limiting ICE officers in Washington was temporarily recessed after sharp exchanges between lawmakers over testimony and procedural disputes.