Rob Anderson and a concerned Ridgefield parent share details of complaints against a coach in the Ridgefield School District
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
Fear of reprisal has a way of swallowing voices. When young people witness wrongdoing — or experience harm themselves — the threat of retaliation can press down so heavily that silence feels like the only safe option. But silence doesn’t protect victims. It protects systems that fail them.
That is where this story begins: with fear, with silence, and with a school district that failed the students who relied on it.
For nearly two years, students inside the Ridgefield School District tried to warn administrators that something was wrong with the Ridgefield High School head cheer coach. Those warnings were ignored, minimized, or redirected back to the very adult students said were causing harm. What followed was not accountability, but delay, damage control, and — shockingly — public praise.
The complaints no one wanted to hear
The earliest complaints against Head Cheer Coach Angela Campbell began in 2023. Students described conduct that left them feeling intimidated, humiliated, and targeted. Some reports were handwritten — halting, emotional, and clearly difficult for students to put into words. Yet the themes were unmistakable: public shaming, inappropriate and profane language, retaliatory behavior, and intrusive involvement in students’ personal relationships.
Several students said the environment was so controlling that they felt pressure to protect the coach’s reputation rather than their own well-being.
By February 2024, the pattern had become undeniable. Two formal incident reports described emotional and verbal abuse, disparaging comments, and conduct that crossed professional boundaries. Other complaints echoed similar experiences: cheerleaders left in tears, fear replacing motivation, and behavior that felt personal rather than instructional.
Instead of being protected, students were repeatedly directed back to the coach through reminders of the “chain of command.” For a young person experiencing abuse, being told to confront the adult responsible does not build resilience — it reinforces control. It deepens humiliation. It creates the perfect conditions for manipulation to thrive.
Some students quietly left the competition team. Some switched to online school to cope with anxiety and depression. Some endured in silence. Others, not fully understanding what was happening, were drawn into harassment and bullying — encouraged by the very adult entrusted with their safety.
Findings without accountability
Athletic Director Brynan Shipley eventually investigated and confirmed several of these concerns, issuing a “Letter of Directive” — oddly undated and kept internally — documenting serious misconduct. The letter confirmed that the coach used inappropriate and unprofessional language toward students, publicly humiliated a student during competition, framed the team’s state performance as her own embarrassment, and left a state awards ceremony early, leaving students in the care of a minor.
Despite these findings, the district took no meaningful corrective action. Parents who attempted to follow up were met with silence, delayed meetings, and vague responses. The conduct was reframed as interpersonal “drama.” Students were left with the impression that speaking up only made things worse.
A troubling turn
By May 2025, after months of pressure, the district finally opened an investigation. Yet even as that investigation was underway, Ridgefield School District did the unthinkable: it publicly elevated and celebrated the coach.
On May 30, 2025, the district inexplicably posted a congratulatory message on Facebook celebrating Coach Campbell and Athletic Director Shipley for statewide “Coach of the Year” nominations with:
“Big congratulations are in order!
… These prestigious nominations are a reflection of their incredible leadership, dedication, and positive impact they have on our student-athletes and school community.”
That post has since been deleted.
Even though Superintendent Rodriguez had already opened an investigation, and the district had a written directive on file documenting serious concerns, the district nonetheless chose to celebrate the coach.
In early June, after months of getting nowhere, a parent reached out for help. I listened and advised filing a public records request to compel disclosure of what the district already possessed. The parent submitted a request on June 3, and I submitted an identical request the following day to help bring additional attention to the matter.
Within a few hours, the district reversed course. The previously unresponsive athletic director urgently requested a meeting with the parent. Just days later — on June 9, 2025, barely ten days after being publicly praised — Coach Campbell resigned, effective immediately.
While the district initially characterized the departure as voluntary, an internal summary later stated plainly that the district “made the decision to part ways with Coach Campbell.”
Resignation, however, is not accountability. Many parents have seen this pattern across school districts statewide — allowing teachers with abusive behavior to leave quietly, with little or no consequence, under the guise of resignation.
And for the students who had already been ignored, the story was far from over.
For more info about this story, watch the latest Reformcast E5 HERE
Part Two reveals what happened next — and how students who spoke up were harmed all over again.
Rob Anderson and a concerned Ridgefield parent
Ridgefield
Also read:
- Letter: Part One – Inside Ridgefield School District’s failure to protect students
A Ridgefield parent and Rob Anderson describe how student complaints against a high school coach were handled by the school district. - Opinion: Business is already leaving Washington
Mark Harmsworth argues that recent and proposed tax policies are pushing Washington businesses to consider leaving the state. - Opinion: The income tax proposal has arrived
Ryan Frost of the Washington Policy Center argues that a proposed Washington income tax creates a new revenue stream rather than delivering tax reform or relief. - Opinion: ‘If they want light rail, they should be the ones who pay for it’
Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance argues that supporters of light rail tied to the I-5 Bridge replacement should bear the local cost of operating and maintaining the system through a narrowly drawn sub-district. - POLL: If a sub-district is created, what area should it include?
Clark County residents are asked where a potential C-TRAN sub-district should be drawn if voters are asked to fund light rail operations and maintenance costs.
