Vancouver resident Ann Makar shares a recent interaction with Congresswoman Marie Gluesenkamp Perez
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and do not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
I sent this message through Marie Gluesenkamp Perez’ website, requesting that she support the defunding of Planned Parenthood:

“The federal government has no reason to fund abortion providers. There are thousands of care centers for women, including many that charge NO MONEY to the girls and women they serve. Many of these centers are run by donors and volunteers. Why should our federal tax dollars be sent to Planned Parenthood, which also receives tax money from state, county, and local sources?”
She responded: “Growing up, my dad was the pastor of a small evangelical church, and as a child, I attended pro-life rallies with my mom. I have deep respect for those who see the gift of life as the beautiful gift it is. But as a mom now, I know pregnancy is informed by highly specific, personal circumstances, and when and how and which pregnancies are nurtured is not a choice that can be made by policy-wonks who’ve never heard of preeclampsia or placenta previa.
“I understand that we won’t see eye to eye on every issue, but I want you to know that I take very seriously my responsibility to represent every member of our community and be an independent voice for Washington’s Third Congressional District. Please [know] I will keep your input in mind if legislation related to this issue comes to a vote before the House.”
While I appreciate the tone of her reply, Marie sadly fails to recognize the sanctity of human life from conception to natural death.
Ann Makar
Vancouver
Also read:
- Opinion: Two ways to keep rightDoug Dahl explains how Washington drivers must “keep right” differently depending on whether traffic flows in one direction or both, plus the exceptions that apply to two-way turn lanes.
- Opinion: A troubling end to a disruptive sessionLet’s Go Washington highlights multiple instances where legislative leaders dismissed historic public feedback, advanced controversial tax policies, and undermined constituent influence.
- Opinion: Washington state is blowing up its no-income-tax advantageLawmakers advanced SB 6346 with an emergency clause, aiming to end Washington’s no-income-tax reputation and prevent voters from seeking a referendum.
- Opinion: Labor to hit householdsHouseholds hiring for childcare or cleaning may soon need formal contracts due to a Washington law extending workplace rules to domestic arrangements.
- POLL: What do you think will happen if Washington’s new income tax becomes law?A new poll asks Clark County Today readers to predict what will happen if Washington’s nearly 10% tax on high incomes becomes law.







