Washougal resident Anne Haller believes all citizens should be concerned about the growing trend of pastors giving explicit voting advice to their congregations
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and do not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
It’s time for politically active churches to lose their tax-exempt status.

All citizens should be concerned about the growing trend of pastors giving explicit voting advice to their congregations. This practice undermines the separation of church and state and is in direct conflict with their tax-exempt status.
The principle of separation of church and state is a cornerstone of our democracy, designed to ensure that religious institutions do not wield undue influence over political affairs. Pastors using their pulpits to recommend specific candidates or political parties, are blurring the line between religious guidance and political campaigning. This is unconstitutional and in direct violation of their tax-exempt status.
Religious organizations benefit from tax-exempt status under the condition that they refrain from participating in political campaigning. The IRS guidelines: are clear: tax-exempt organizations, cannot endorse or oppose political candidates. This misuse of their platform should lead to rejection of their tax-exempt status.
Pastor’s Pick is a national organization driving this effort. Local churches are distributing a complete list of recommended WA candidates to their congregations. If they want to do that, they should pay taxes like any other business. Let’s stop pretending that religious leaders don’t have a political agenda.
People look to their religious leaders for moral advice now they’re getting their ballot choices from them too. This is not what the founders of our country intended and it’s not what the church’s monies should be spent on unless they are willing to pay taxes to the city, county, state and country. Let’s keep church and state separate.
Anne Haller
Washougal
Also read:
- Opinion: Not a Good choiceLars Larson argues that personal choices led to a deadly confrontation with law enforcement during an ICE operation in Minneapolis.
- Opinion: ‘The IBR team has been lying to us and thanks to a veteran Oregon journalist, we have the smoking gun’Ken Vance argues newly obtained documents show Interstate Bridge Replacement staff withheld updated cost estimates from lawmakers and the public.
- Opinion: State CO2 report shows 86% of Washington’s claimed climate benefits are probably fakeTodd Myers argues a state climate report significantly overstates emissions reductions and raises concerns about data accuracy and accountability in Washington’s climate spending.
- Opinion: Majority party policies still making life more expensive for WashingtoniansRep. John Ley outlines his opposition to new taxes, raises concerns about state spending, and details legislation he plans to pursue during the 2026 Washington legislative session.
- Opinion: What happens when you build a state budget on the most volatile tax sources?Ryan Frost argues that relying on volatile tax sources like income and capital gains taxes risks destabilizing Washington’s budget and undermining long-term fiscal planning.







