‘While ensuring law enforcement officers meet high standards is important, some provisions in this bill are unconstitutional and could further strain Washington’s already overburdened law enforcement system’
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and do not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
Washington State House Democrats are once again demonstrating a lack of commitment to public safety by undermining our law enforcement officers’ ability to protect and serve. This is evident in their support for House Bill 1399 (HB 1399), which aims to change the qualifications and authority of elected and appointed officials, particularly the offices of county sheriff and police chief, in Washington state. While ensuring law enforcement officers meet high standards is important, some provisions in this bill are unconstitutional and could further strain Washington’s already overburdened law enforcement system.

This opposition is not about allowing sheriffs to operate without oversight. I support reasonable qualifications for all elected officials. However, several provisions of HB 1399 appear politically motivated by anti-police interest groups, undermining both local autonomy and voter rights.
One of the most troubling aspects of HB 1399 is its violation of Article 1, Section 19 of the Washington State Constitution, which empowers citizens’ rights to run for office and participate in elections without interference from any civil power. The bill would require candidates for Sheriff to submit to a background investigation by the Washington State Patrol (WSP and if the Criminal Justice Training Commission (CJTC) deems a candidate “unsuitable for election,” they would be barred from running for office. Such a provision creates the potential for arbitrary disqualification based on subjective decisions, stripping citizens of their right to choose their local law enforcement leaders.
Additionally, HB 1399 violates Article 1, Section 33, which ensures the right to recall elected officials by voters by empowering the CJTC to vacate the office of Sheriff should the official fail their arbitrary certification. While I recognize the importance of training and oversight, this provision allows for the removal of an elected Sheriff without due process. The authority to remove an elected official should lie with voters through the recall process and not with an unelected commission.
Another concern is the bill’s attempt to eliminate the discretion that Sheriffs and their deputies have in enforcing the law. By mandating that the Constitution and laws of Washington State “shall” be enforced, HB 1399 removes any flexibility in law enforcement. Officers often face complex situations that require judgment calls and prioritization, such as whether to enforce minor offenses or outdated laws without any consideration of limited resources or community trust building. Removing discretion could lead to more rigid, one-size-fits-all approaches that don’t account for the unique needs of communities.
Finally, Washington state already faces significant challenges in law enforcement. The state has the lowest rate of law enforcement officers per 1,000 people in the nation. With fewer than 1.4 officers per 1,000 residents, compared to the national average of 2.3, this shortage puts a heavy burden on law enforcement. Many departments, including our very own Clark County, struggle to maintain adequate staffing. In some areas, law enforcement agencies can’t respond to calls in a timely manner due to staffing shortages. Instead of addressing these challenges, HB 1399 could further limit law enforcement’s ability to respond effectively.
In conclusion, while the intent behind HB 1399 may be to improve standards for law enforcement, its provisions would negatively impact public safety in Washington. The bill undermines local control, infringes upon constitutional rights, and could worsen law enforcement shortages and public safety. Democrats in Olympia should stop playing politics with public safety and should instead focus on solutions that strengthen law enforcement, respect voter rights, and provide adequate resources to our sheriff and police departments.
John Jay
Clark County
Also read:
- VIDEO: WA income tax signed into law with legal challenge right behindA 9.9% income tax affecting high earners in Washington faces swift legal opposition and a proposed citizen initiative seeking repeal.
- Income tax signed in Washington with a legal challenge close behindA new law will tax households earning over $1 million, with funds aimed at expanding credits for lower-income residents. Lawsuits and challenges are already underway.
- Peter Silliman announces candidacy for Clark County CouncilPeter Silliman, small business owner and Charter Review Commissioner, is seeking the District 5 seat and promises action on transparency, housing, and park development.
- Opinion: Defend bail now or face more chaos on our streetsA proposed Washington court rule would cap bail for most misdemeanors and allow defendants to bypass bondsmen, raising concerns about accountability and public safety.
- State Representatives McClintock and Ley answer questions at town hall in Battle GroundResidents voiced rising concerns about property taxes, school funding debates, the impact of new income tax legislation, and major costs tied to the Interstate Bridge plan.







