Anna Miller says USAID is the Titanic of agencies, and she’s OK with it hitting the iceberg!

Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com

The recent revelations about USAID’s $550 million contract fraud — enabled by former contracting officer Roderick Watson — are outrageous, but sadly, not surprising. For years, USAID has operated with minimal scrutiny and maximum insulation, creating fertile ground for corruption. 

This case, involving lavish bribes, shell companies, and fake invoices, is just one example of what happens when accountability is treated as optional.

While the scheme was formally exposed by the Department of Justice and USAID’s own Office of Inspector General, it’s worth noting that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has targeted USAID as emblematic of bloated bureaucracy and systemic waste and fraud. The fact that it took more than a decade for this fraud to come to light says everything about the culture within the agency. 

Public funds are meant to serve real people — not to line the pockets of insiders and their associates. USAID needs a top-to-bottom audit, real independent oversight, and a housecleaning that goes far beyond one prosecution.

USAID is the Titanic of agencies, and I’m ok with it hitting the iceberg!

Anna Miller
Camas

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: The income tax proposal has arrived
  Ryan Frost of the Washington Policy Center argues that a proposed Washington income tax creates a new revenue stream rather than delivering tax reform or relief.
• 
  Opinion: ‘If they want light rail, they should be the ones who pay for it’
  Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance argues that supporters of light rail tied to the I-5 Bridge replacement should bear the local cost of operating and maintaining the system through a narrowly drawn sub-district.
• 
  POLL: If a sub-district is created, what area should it include?
  Clark County residents are asked where a potential C-TRAN sub-district should be drawn if voters are asked to fund light rail operations and maintenance costs.
• 
  Opinion: IBR falsely blaming inflation
  Joe Cortright argues that inflation explains only a small portion of the IBR project’s cost increases and that rising consultant and staff expenses are the primary drivers.
• 
  Letter: The Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s $141 million bribe can be better spent on sandwich steel-concrete tubes
  Bob Ortblad argues that an immersed tunnel using sandwich steel-concrete tubes would be a more cost-effective alternative to the current Interstate Bridge Replacement Program design.