Battle Ground resident Brian Munson provides a look at the cost of representation
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
When we think about where our tax dollars go, we often picture roads, schools, and emergency services. But a portion also goes toward paying our elected officials — including the salaries and benefits of Battle Ground City Council members. And for what’s considered a part-time role, the numbers might surprise you.
The cost of representation

According to the city of Battle Ground’s 2024 Benefit Statement Report, the total cost for council member salaries, benefits, and taxes amounted to $172,279.31. If divided equally among council members and meetings, that’s approximately $1,025.47 per member per meeting. With some meetings lasting just a few hours, the hourly rate can exceed $250.
While some council members opt for the minimum authorized monthly wage, others take full advantage of available benefits — including medical, dental, and optical insurance. It’s worth noting that council members can choose to decline benefits or accept only partial coverage. In fact, one former council member even donated half of their salary back to the city.
Salary Growth and Oversight
Over the past decade, some council positions have seen salary increases of up to 650%, depending on the individual and their tenure. These increases can be approved in two ways:
- By council vote, which only takes effect after the next election for each position.
- Through a Salary Commission, made up of appointed community members who review and recommend compensation changes.
This system is designed to provide checks and balances, but it also raises questions about accountability and transparency.
Transparency matters
A recent social media post by Councilwoman Cherish Desrochers attempted to clarify her compensation:
“My pay while serving as a council member is $1,000 per month and I receive an additional $350 for opting out of health insurance. I receive a grand total of $1,350 per month.”
While this statement is mostly accurate, it omits the fact that she also receives dental insurance, which increases her total compensation. Meanwhile, other council members reportedly receive over $3,500 per month in salary and benefits. Each council member’s salary and benefit breakdown is available in the Benefit Statement Report annually.
What Should Public Service Look Like?
During past council discussions, some members advocated for pay increases based on what other similarly sized cities offer. But should elected officials be benchmarking their compensation against others — or focusing on the unique needs of their own community?
Public service should be about serving the people, not maximizing personal gain. When compensation begins to outpace the value delivered to citizens, it’s time to ask hard questions.
What Can You Do?
- Attend council meetings and stay informed.
- Request public records to understand how your tax dollars are spent.
- Engage with council members and ask for transparency.
Brian Munson
Battle Ground
Also read:
- Opinion: Blood on the highways fails to move Ferguson and KotekLars Larson criticizes Washington and Oregon governors over licensing policies he says are linked to deadly truck crashes and ongoing highway safety risks.
- Opposing statements sought for Feb. 10, 2026 ballot measuresThe Clark County Elections Office is seeking registered voters to write opposing statements for two local school district propositions ahead of the February 10, 2026 special election.
- Opinion: A warning to Washington – The ‘Minnesota Model’ of fraud has arrivedYacolt resident Mark Rose warns that Washington’s grant pass-through system mirrors the failures behind Minnesota’s Feeding Our Future fraud scandal and urges stronger oversight before taxpayers face major losses.
- Voting by mail faces uncertain moment ahead of midterm electionsWith a Supreme Court case looming and states tightening deadlines, voting by mail faces new legal and political uncertainty ahead of next year’s midterm elections.
- Let’s Go Washington issues initiatives signature count updateLet’s Go Washington says it has collected more than 315,000 and 289,000 signatures on two initiatives and is pushing toward 400,000 per measure.








The article didn’t say how many hours a week they put into their role of city councilor. I am assuming that part time is 20-30 hrs a week. If.that is the case are they able to work another job, as long as it doesn’t create a conflict of interest. So it’s for people who are just looking for a part-time gig..
Battle Ground city council has long since been a cesspool of pathetic junior league politicians who are animated by their self interest. And, as a group, are not bright, so they stand no chance of professional decision making.
City Councilor Cherish DesRochers was unconcerned about the fluoridation chemicals from China that the city of Battle Ground adds to the water. A public hearing was held on the matter in Battle Ground on July 21, 2025, the worst public hearing I have witnessed since 1997. Mayor McCoy started out by cutting down public comments from the normal 3 minutes to just 1 minute per person. Residents and people from area groups had prepared comments according to the published guidelines for the meeting. The Mayor went on to call residents who oppose the continued addition of fluoridation chemicals into the water flat earthers and other insults.
One person testified that Clark Public Utilities does not add fluoridation chemicals to the water. The cities of Aberdeen, Washougal, Lynden, Hillsboro, Lebanon and others do NOT add fluoridation chemicals either. The states of Florida and Utah, and Los Angeles County halted the practice in 2025 in response to a growing body of studies on the harms of these chemicals if ingested in drinking water, especially for babies and children. Multnomah County and Clackamas County in Oregon do NOT add fluoridation chemicals to the water.
I did request public records from Battle Ground that raise serious concerns about these chemicals added to the water, which were reported to also include lead and arsenic in a batch that was added to the water. Have the Mayor and Council read these city records? They were not presented at the public hearing. Brian Munson is running for Battle Ground City Councilor position 6, and would look at the public records seriously when considering a decision that impacts the health of residents young and old. For information on the health hazard that these chemicals pose, see https://flluoridealert.org