Anna Miller shares that there’s credible evidence that some of the more disruptive ones are being fueled by well-organized networks with ideological and possibly international backing
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
There’s a growing body of reporting that points to a complex web of funding and coordination behind some of the recent protests — particularly those that escalated into riots in Los Angeles. Several investigations and media outlets have highlighted the roles of left-leaning organizations like the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA), and the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL).

One particularly striking thread involves Neville Roy Singham, a tech millionaire with ties to China, who has reportedly funded Marxist groups including PSL. These groups have been active in organizing anti-ICE protests and broader anti-government demonstrations. Some of the rhetoric and materials used in these protests—like the “No Kings” messaging — have been linked to this network.
The FBI has confirmed it is investigating the financial trail behind these events, including any potential foreign influence or funding from entities linked to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Lawmakers like Senator Josh Hawley have also launched inquiries into whether taxpayer-funded nonprofits are indirectly supporting these actions.
So, while not every protest is part of a coordinated campaign, there’s credible evidence that some of the more disruptive ones are being fueled by well-organized networks with ideological and possibly international backing.
What is the going rate for screaming, chanting, holding up NO KING signs, throwing rocks and spitting at police officers, burning cars, looting businesses and destroying personal property-you know-mostly peacefully protesting?
Anna Miller
Camas, Washington
Also read:
- Opinion: 2026 Washington Poll: Voters want economic focus, spending restraint, and ed transparencyResults from the first Washington Poll show voters prioritizing the economy, spending restraint, and school transparency, with broad support for education reforms and concern over housing affordability.
- Opinion: House Bill 2481 will stifle innovation and hurt businessesMark Harmsworth argues that House Bill 2481 would restrict market-driven pricing, increase regulatory burdens, and ultimately harm Washington businesses and consumers.
- Opinion: Kindness is always welcome, even in places where one does not always find itPaul Valencia reflects on how a brief moment of kindness between a journalist and a football coach underscores the importance of respect in journalism and public life.
- Opinion: Crossing the mighty Columbia River is getting mighty expensiveAn opinion column argues lawmakers must reassess the I-5 Columbia River Bridge replacement after revised estimates show the project’s probable cost has more than doubled.
- Letter: ReformCast launches with exclusive interview with Councilor Michelle BelkotRob Anderson announces the launch of ReformCast, a new video podcast featuring conversations about Clark County government, beginning with an interview of Councilor Michelle Belkot.







