Vancouver resident David E. Poland says he has come to the same conclusion of other deaf experts
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
After decades of studying comparing our region to other regions of our nation, I have come to the same conclusion as other deaf experts.
Greedy Medical Corporations and Eugenicists wanted deaf people dumb to keep them dependent on state handouts and make money off of their bodies.
Thank French Catholic priests and American Protestant pastors for sign language education. On the playground, French Sign Language and Martha’s Vineyard Dialect – half of the colony was born Deaf, everyone signed, and nobody was treated defective – were melted into American Sign Language. Deaf went from attics to so skilled that forty years later they hit a glass ceiling.
Then the son of the Reverend Gallaudet – who opened the first signing deaf school in Connecticut on April 15, 1817 – appealed to Congressmen and convinced them to fund the first college. President Abraham Lincoln signed their charter, which still dons the walls inside Gallaudet University, the only university on earth for the deaf.
But thriving, educated, deaf men struck fear into the hearts of followers of Sir Galton’s take on his cousin Darwin’s values. The son of a man who made up an elocution method in the United Kingdom, Alexander Bell, decided if used on deaf students instead of signed language he would become a very wealthy man. Thus he set upon the path to exploit desperate parents and sell “his” oral method. He outraged the deaf worldwide by publishing his eugenics article: “Upon the Formation of a Deaf Variety of the Human Race.” Bell urged all government funding of signing schools to end, all deaf male teachers – who were role models to students – be fired and replaced with teenage, female, oralism teachers, and for public schools to teach deaf students that they were unfit, just to prevent deaf adults from taking their jobs.
The Deaf Dark Ages began as the campus chapels were torn down and the connection between God and right to education through visual communion was severed.
Contrast how the superintendent wrote about segregating younger students from those who signed, but today’s deaf superintendent at Washington School for the Deaf wants to remove the stigma and barriers so deaf can thrive once again. Sadly since most students arrive without a first language, many never obtain their birth potential. Due to language deprivation, they will struggle to understand.
The handicap was created by Bell’s eugenics movement, and still rages on with AGBell and the medical corporate lobbying of politicians, and keeping the public ignorant with fear-mongering pathology to maintain profit margins. Instead of drilling into the skull of a baby and taxpayers funding the bill of $50,000 per implant and supporting genetically modifying deaf children by replacing a deaf gene with a hearing gene, the solution for illiteracy and improving academic excellence is clearly establishing an American Sign Language program at Washington School for the Deaf for hearing parents and their new deaf infants – as young as age zero and as little as mildly deaf diagnosis. 100% access to language could lead to the need for an honors program next – which would scare the hell out of eugenicists!
To achieve this long-term goal to save taxpayers money, and provide dignity back to being a Deaf American again, we are going to have to fight corporate powers for equal rights that were stolen from us. I ask legislators to fully fund whatever the superintendent of our deaf school needs to set up this program in 2026, and tour the DeafSpace designed fully accessible campus.
Every deaf child deserves the right to life, bodily autonomy, language fluency, and to be recognized as a whole person.
David E. Poland, MSW
Vancouver
Also read:
- Opinion: ‘If they want light rail, they should be the ones who pay for it’
Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance argues that supporters of light rail tied to the I-5 Bridge replacement should bear the local cost of operating and maintaining the system through a narrowly drawn sub-district. - POLL: If a sub-district is created, what area should it include?
Clark County residents are asked where a potential C-TRAN sub-district should be drawn if voters are asked to fund light rail operations and maintenance costs. - Opinion: IBR falsely blaming inflation
Joe Cortright argues that inflation explains only a small portion of the IBR project’s cost increases and that rising consultant and staff expenses are the primary drivers. - Letter: The Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s $141 million bribe can be better spent on sandwich steel-concrete tubes
Bob Ortblad argues that an immersed tunnel using sandwich steel-concrete tubes would be a more cost-effective alternative to the current Interstate Bridge Replacement Program design. - Opinion: Washingtonians want affordability, not more taxes, according to our recent survey
Rep. John Ley shares results from a legislative survey showing affordability concerns and opposition to new taxes among respondents, while outlining Republican priorities in Olympia.
