Area resident Bob Zak believes HB 1163 is not needed
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and do not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
Reading Dick Rylaner’s summary of Senator Adrian Cortes’ votes on bills from our 2025 Legislative session, Sen. Cortes voted YES on HB 1163 to “enhance public safety” by those purchasing firearms. I did send an email to Senator Cortes asking him to vote NO on this as we already have protections and background checks via the sheriff’s office in the county where the purchaser resides.

HB 1163 is not needed. It also violates our state and federal Constitution for bearing firearms. Senator Cortes did NOT respond to my email. WA State Constitution – Article 1, Section 24 “The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall NOT be impaired….” Our Bill of Rights – our US Constitution – 2nd Amendment – “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.”
HB1163 is an infringement and will fail in court.
When we have tremendous budget issues, to spend time on a proposal like HB1163 which is unconstitutional on its face, is a waste of time. But then again, the legislature majority party was/is Democratic and the governor is the same party. Anyone from the majority party listening?
Bob Zak
Vancouver, Hazel Dell, Lakeshore
Also read:
- Opinion: Tax day is painful enough without Washington adding its ownWashington’s new 9.9% income tax mirrors federal pattern: start narrow, expand to hit everyone within years.
- POLL: What do you believe is the biggest reason school districts are facing budget shortfalls?Districts across Washington warn of budget gaps as debate grows over rising costs versus inadequate state funding.
- Opinion: The high cost of hiding – Why IBR’s delayed revenue study is a $15 billion warning signIBR delays critical toll revenue analysis until June 2027, hiding financial details until after project approval.
- Opinion: The high cost of hiding – Why IBR’s delayed revenue study is a $15 billion warning signIBR delays critical toll revenue analysis until June 2027, hiding financial details until after project approval.
- Opinion: Washington fails the test for affordabilityMountain States Policy Center analysis reveals Washington ranks 5th most expensive state as residents migrate to Idaho and Texas.







