Area resident Bob Zak believes HB 1163 is not needed
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and do not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
Reading Dick Rylaner’s summary of Senator Adrian Cortes’ votes on bills from our 2025 Legislative session, Sen. Cortes voted YES on HB 1163 to “enhance public safety” by those purchasing firearms. I did send an email to Senator Cortes asking him to vote NO on this as we already have protections and background checks via the sheriff’s office in the county where the purchaser resides.
HB 1163 is not needed. It also violates our state and federal Constitution for bearing firearms. Senator Cortes did NOT respond to my email. WA State Constitution – Article 1, Section 24 “The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall NOT be impaired….” Our Bill of Rights – our US Constitution – 2nd Amendment – “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.”
HB1163 is an infringement and will fail in court.
When we have tremendous budget issues, to spend time on a proposal like HB1163 which is unconstitutional on its face, is a waste of time. But then again, the legislature majority party was/is Democratic and the governor is the same party. Anyone from the majority party listening?
Bob Zak
Vancouver, Hazel Dell, Lakeshore
Also read:
- Opinion: A year in review of news stories from a former sports guy
Clark County Today reporter Paul Valencia reflects on his evolving role, revisiting major news, community debates, sports moments, and human-interest stories that shaped Clark County in 2025. - Opinion: Ready for another pay decrease from the state? It happens Jan. 1
Elizabeth New (Hovde) argues that Washington’s Paid Family and Medical Leave payroll tax increase will further reduce workers’ take-home pay beginning Jan. 1. - Opinion: Justice for none – Court hands down a mandate without a dime to fund it
Nancy Churchill argues that a Washington Supreme Court ruling on public defense imposes costly mandates on local governments without providing funding to implement them. - Letter: When headlines gaslight the public
Vancouver resident Peter Bracchi argues that emotionally charged immigration headlines blur legal distinctions and mislead the public rather than inform it. - Opinion: California’s unemployment debt crisis mirrors Washington’s Employment Security Department failures
Mark Harmsworth compares California’s growing unemployment insurance debt with Washington’s Employment Security Department failures and argues both states must reform or risk continued economic harm.
