Vancouver resident Julia Dawn Seaver shares her views on HB 1399
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and do not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
Another day, another bad bill – one that puts more women at risk. HB 1399 claims to be about modernizing and clarifying laws concerning sheriffs, chiefs, marshals, and police matrons, but at the end of the 21 page bill is a section calling for the repeal of several RCWs (Revised Code of Washington). You have to go to the codes to find out exactly what is being repealed since it’s not specified in the bill.
Current law states that no member of one sex under arrest shall be confined in the same cell with a member of the other sex. It also requires police matrons to be in charge of females who have been detained. Both requirements would be repealed under HB 1399, effectively making all jails and prisons co-ed.
We’ve already seen what’s happened to women since gender ideology took over. Men who simply declare themselves to be a woman are being placed in cells with women, sometimes with disastrous results. Mozzy Clark is suing Washington state for failing to protect her from sexual assault after placing a 6-foot-4 fully intact biological man with a history of violence and sexual assaults, into her cell. He’s just one of at least 11 biological men, many with a history of violence and sexual assault against women and children, who are housed at Washington State’s women’s prison. It’s one of many stories from states around the country.
Women say the experience of having to share living quarters including open showers and toilets with men is dangerous and degrading. The majority of women who are incarcerated – 86% according to one study – have been sexually assaulted during their lives. These situations retraumatize them, preventing healing from taking place. Putting vulnerable women at further risk is just plain wrong.
A hearing on the bill will take place Wednesday, February 19 at 4 p.m. Click on the links to weigh-in or testify against the bill.
To register a CON on this bill click here: https://app.leg.wa.gov/csi/Testifier/Add?chamber=House&mId=32861&aId=164631&caId=26009&tId=3
To testify online during the hearing click here: https://app.leg.wa.gov/csi/Testifier/Add?chamber=House&mId=32861&aId=164631&caId=26009&tId=2
Julia Dawn Seaver
Vancouver
Also read:
- Opinion: Washington passed an income tax to fund education, then the same majority cut education — and left $700+ million on the table
State officials passed a new income tax to fund education, then approved over $1 billion in cuts—while forgoing $700 million in annual federal scholarships students could have received. - Letter: In defense of Joe Kent, a war hero
Ozzie Gonzalez shares a firsthand account of his time working for Joe Kent, emphasizing Kent’s military background and principled stance on foreign policy controversies. - Opinion: ‘Washington’s majority party is panicking’
Nancy Churchill argues that controversial state policies, including new taxes, law enforcement changes, and agency power grabs, are generating a wave of backlash in communities across Washington. - Letter: ‘Now we have Engineer Bob telling us the I-5 Bridge needs replacing because it is built on shifting sand with wooden structures’
Amboy resident Thomas Schenk critiques Democrat leadership, tax policies, and the addition of light rail to the I-5 Bridge, while urging Republican voters to participate more in midterm elections. - Opinion: ‘This is not the best and most efficient use of the taxpayers’ funds’
Ken Vance critiques the announced $14.4 billion I-5 Bridge replacement, questioning funding gaps, the insistence on light rail, unaddressed congestion, and transparency from state officials.
