
The state of Washington still intends to seek a nationwide block of the president’s order to restrict birthright citizenship
Jake Goldstein-Street
Washington State Standard
Despite a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in favor of the Trump administration on Friday, the state of Washington still intends to seek a nationwide block of the president’s order to restrict birthright citizenship.
“Washington still plans to seek relief for all its harms — that is what we argued for and won in the trial court,” attorney general’s office spokesperson Mike Faulk said in an email Friday.
Washington Attorney General Nick Brown, alongside attorneys general from Oregon, Arizona and Illinois, had argued nationwide relief was necessary while litigation plays out over the order.
But in a 6-3 ruling in the case on Friday, the Supreme Court imposed new limits on lower court judges issuing nationwide injunctions.
Under the ruling, President Donald Trump’s order could go into effect in 30 days in states that didn’t sue, raising the possibility that babies born to immigrant parents in Washington would be U.S. citizens, while those born in neighboring states like Idaho would not be.
The high court did not rule on the merits of Trump’s executive order. Further legal battles over the order, including with the lawsuit backed by Washington, still lie ahead.
Brown has argued previously that the state, instead of the federal government, would have to pay for social services for babies born in other states without birthright citizenship who later move to states like Washington.
In his Feb. 6 injunction, U.S. District Court Judge John Coughenour in Seattle agreed, ordering that anything less than nationwide relief is “ineffectual.” Coughenour’s order was one of three nationwide injunctions the Supreme Court considered.
Brown, in a statement, noted that the justices “confirmed that courts may issue broad injunctions when needed to provide complete relief to the parties.”
“We continue to believe that President Trump’s unconstitutional and cruel order must be stopped across the country to guarantee protection for Washington and its residents,” he continued.
Washington’s case currently sits at the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals after arguments in Seattle this month. Whether the Supreme Court’s ruling sends the case back to Coughenour is unclear. Faulk said the attorney general’s office expects more clarity on this question soon.
Trump’s executive action aims to end birthright citizenship for babies born to a mother and father who are not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents.
In 2022, about 4,000 babies were born in Washington to two parents without legal immigration status, according to the states’ lawsuit.
This report was first published by the Washington State Standard.
Also read:
- VFD dispatched to motor vehicle accidentVancouver Fire Department responded to a truck versus SUV collision at NE 117th Avenue and NE 87th Street, extricating trapped patients and transporting three to area hospitals.
- State high school basketball: Celebrating a coaching connection at Camas and Fort VancouverCamas and Fort Vancouver saw their state playoff runs end on the same night, highlighting a unique coaching bond between Scott Thompson and James Jones.
- $1B for WA broadband gets Trump administration approvalFederal approval unlocks over $1 billion to expand high-speed internet to unserved and underserved communities across Washington.
- WA passes legislation requiring no-cost insurance for state recommended vaccinesHouse Bill 2242 shifts the trigger for no-cost vaccine insurance coverage in Washington from federal recommendations to the state Department of Health.
- Opinion: WA House Finance Committee passes income tax billRyan Frost argues that ESSB 6346, which would impose a 9.9 percent income tax, advances to the House floor despite widespread opposition and ongoing budget growth.
- Journey Theater presents Mary PoppinsJourney Theater will stage six performances of Mary Poppins at Fort Vancouver High School beginning March 6, featuring a cast of local youth performers.
- Opinion: A-pillars – The safety feature that increases crashesDoug Dahl explains how wider A-pillars designed to protect occupants in rollovers may also reduce visibility and increase crash risk for other road users.








