Tuesday night’s slim lead was enough for supporters to say they were ‘confident’ of victory
Carleen Johnson
The Center Square Washington
In initial Tuesday night returns, Initiative 2066, which aims to ensure natural gas remains an energy choice in Washington state, was leading by a margin of 51.2% to 48.7%.
I-2066 is one of four initiatives backed by the conservative political group Let’s Go Washington.
Tuesday night’s slim lead was enough for supporters to say they were “confident” of victory.
“I think the margin looks good right now and we’ll end up winning,” said Greg Lane, Vice President of the Building Industry Association of Washington, in a Tuesday night interview with The Center Square.
“We’re sending a message to the legislature that we need to protect natural gas as an energy source for the state of Washington,” said Lane, who noted other states have been reaching out for help because of similar policies attempting to ban natural gas elsewhere.
Backers of the measure turned in more than 546,000 back in July after only 50 days to gather signatures. The shortened time was the result of a legal challenge from opponents.
The approval of 2066 will prohibit the state and all local governments from banning, restricting or discouraging the use of natural gas in new or existing homes or commercial buildings.
The ultimately successful effort to get I-2066 on the ballot was prompted by concerns over the passage of House Bill 1589 during this year’s legislative session.
HB 1589 allows Puget Sound Energy, the state’s largest utility, to start planning how to move away from natural gas as part of Gov. Jay Inslee’s efforts to fight climate change.
Opponents of I-2066 issued a report from Climate Solutions in late October that found the measure, if passed, could raise consumer utility gas bills in Washington by $150 or more per year by 2035 and double them by 2050.
Climate Solutions’ argument suggested that with gas use already in decline in the state, and more people choosing electric appliances, that leaves fewer gas customers who will have to pay higher monthly energy bills to maintain a gas system.
In response to the opponents’ report, BIAW noted that an Oct. 17 report from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, showed electricity costs more than three times as much as natural gas.
There are currently only seven states plus Washington, D.C. with jurisdictions restricting natural gas use in new construction. Washington state is one of these regions that have restrictions on natural gas. More than half of U.S. states have placed preemptive measures in place prohibiting natural gas bans by local or state jurisdictions.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Leslie Lewallen stays and fights for Washington as director of Future 42 Clark County
Former Camas City Councilor Leslie Lewallen is leading the Clark County chapter of Future 42, a new organization focused on policy advocacy, accountability, and engaging persuadable voters at the local and state level. - Opinion: ‘Seeking might over right destroys representative government’
Retired judge Dave Larson argues that prioritizing political power over constitutional principles has undermined representative government and calls for renewed civic responsibility. - Letter: ‘Immigration’ resolution scheduled for this Wednesday at Clark County Council Meeting
Rob Anderson urges residents to closely watch an upcoming Clark County Council meeting where an immigration-related resolution and proposed rule changes are expected to be discussed. - Opinion: The 1700-square-foot solution to Washington’s housing crisis
An opinion column arguing that Washington’s energy code has driven up housing costs and outlining how HB 2486 aims to limit those impacts for smaller, more affordable homes. - Rep. John Ley’s new bill calls for an independent audit of Interstate 5 Bridge Replacement Project
Rep. John Ley introduced legislation requiring an independent audit of the Interstate 5 Bridge Replacement Project to review costs, management, and oversight.
