Initiative 2117, which has been certified for the ballot by the Secretary of State’s Office, would repeal the CCA’s cap and trade carbon auctions
TJ Martinell
The Center Square Washington
An initiative on the November ballot could eliminate almost all of the revenue currently diverted by the state toward electrifying the public and private transportation sector.
According to a Wednesday presentation by the Electric Vehicle Coordinating Council, 84 percent of all funding for zero emission vehicle investments comes from revenue generated by the 2021 Climate Commitment Act.
Initiative 2117, which has been certified for the ballot by the Secretary of State’s Office, would repeal the CCA’s cap and trade carbon auctions that have already generated billions in new revenue. Of that, $671 million has been dedicated to ZEV investments. Critics refer to the carbon auction as a “hidden gas tax,” arguing that it has led to increased gas prices in Washington compared to other states.
If approved by voters, it will represent one more hurdle for state efforts to electrify the transportation sector. Although the council approved a transportation electrification strategy last year, it has already acknowledged that it won’t meet its 2030 emission goals. On top of that, the state will need three million more charging ports to accommodate new EVs on the road. The cost of the ports will depend on the type, with the average cost of installation $300 to $1,500 cost for a single EV port level 1, $6,000 for single EV port level 2, and $10,000-$40,000 for DC fast charging port.
Further, they will also have to contend with the increased load on the electrical grid. Clark County recently announced a program offering $50 credit to EV owners who promise not to charge their vehicles during “peak hours.” Clark County currently has 20 EVs per 1,000 residents. The county with the highest is San Juan, with 50.7 EVs per 1,000 residents, while Garfield County has the lowest at 1.3 per 1,000 residents.
EV charging infrastructure currently makes up 33% of state funding for EV investments. Most of the EV investment spending (61%) is through the Washington State Department of Transportation. Almost half (45%) of the state spending is on EV vehicles to convert the existing public fleet.
While the latest state supplemental budget increased spending by $100 million, $130 million or 19% of approved spending has been delayed in response to I-2117.
While the remaining amount will still be spent regardless of whether voters approve I-2117 in November, state Department of Commerce’s Transportation Electrification Policy Lead Steven Hershkowitz told the Electric Vehicle Coordinating Council at its Wednesday meeting that “would not continue to roll over should that policy go away. It really is a significant chunk … of where ZEV are being funded right now.”
The council’s next meeting is May 1.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- POLL: Should councilors serving on boards be required to vote the way the full council decides?
A new poll asks whether Clark County councilors serving on boards should be required to vote in line with the full council’s position or retain independent judgment. - Ninth Circuit revives claims against prosecutor who personally swore to warrant affidavit containing alleged false statements
The Ninth Circuit ruled that prosecutorial immunity does not apply when a prosecutor personally swears to alleged false statements used to obtain an arrest warrant. - VIDEO: Washington lawmakers clash over bills directed at limiting ICE officers
A heated House committee hearing on legislation aimed at limiting ICE officers in Washington was temporarily recessed after sharp exchanges between lawmakers over testimony and procedural disputes. - Stung by a court ruling, WA looks to clarify what is an ‘election’
Washington lawmakers are moving to clarify the legal definition of an election after a court overturned a felony conviction for voting in both Washington and Oregon on the same day. - Opinion: Olympia wants a 4-day work week. It won’t work out as the politicians think it will
Mark Harmsworth argues that House Bill 2611’s proposed 32-hour workweek would raise costs, strain small businesses, and undermine Washington’s economic competitiveness. - Republicans celebrate school choice in US Senate hearing, while Dems question fairness
Republicans and Democrats clashed during a U.S. Senate hearing over school choice, with supporters praising expanded options for families and critics warning the policies could deepen inequities in public education. - Opinion: The many reminders not to speed
Doug Dahl examines the many technological and policy-based reminders aimed at reducing speeding and explains why most drivers still choose not to use them voluntarily.
Good. Stop the carbon grift. Electric cars/trucks/buses are already competitive and becoming more so. The free market is taking care of this, without the government grifting for their favorite donor class. AXE THE CARBON TAX.
As an EV driver, I’m already paying $350 in registration fees to pay for the Electric infrastructure. It’s been a couple years and still no chargers that cost less than $.20 kWh. That means you are paying more than what gas costs.
Stop the cap and trade tax. Stop the overspending and overburdening taxes.