House Bill 1893 would remove the prohibition against receiving unemployment insurance benefits for workers taking part in a strike
Spencer Pauley
The Center Square Washington
The Washington House of Representatives has passed a bill that would allow workers in the state to receive unemployment insurance during strikes.
Currently, a worker is disqualified from receiving benefits if he or she is unemployed because of a labor action. House Bill 1893 would remove the prohibition against receiving unemployment insurance benefits for workers taking part in a strike.
The House approved a notable amendment to the bill to shift costs onto employers involved in labor disputes covered by HB 1893, instead of spreading the expense across the unemployment insurance system. This is a change from the underlying bill which would have had those benefits socialized across the unemployment insurance system.
Rep. Chris Corry, R-Yakima, noted that there is a 5.4% cap on the employment experience factor, so if there is a large strike with a lot of benefits paid out, the employer gets capped at the 5.4% mark.
“[This] inherently means that all the employers in the state are going to pick up the rest of the tab on the impact,” Corry said late Monday night during House floor debate.
According to the bill’s fiscal note, Washington could potentially see an increase this year in unemployment insurance claims from 812 to 3,000. That translates into an increase of $9.8 million to $14.1 million in annual payout of benefits that currently sit around $120 million a year.
The note also found that the state denied an average of 2,313 claims per year due to a labor dispute.
According to Cornell University’s Labor Action Tracker, thousands of workers went on strike in one of 26 labor actions in Washington in 2023.
During the floor debate, Rep. Suzanne Schmidt, R-Spokane Valley, argued that strikes are supposed to be what employees do as a last resort, because negotiations have stalled and this bill incentivizes employees to take advantage of the unemployment benefits.
“By paying employees unemployment during this time, it makes it an easier choice,” Schmidt said. “I fear that this is going to be something that becomes more usual and more often.”
Schmidt added that when workers go on strike, it slows down other industry sectors.
The House passed the bill by a 53-44 vote. The bill now goes to the Senate for consideration.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Speculation on Seahawks’ sale heats up following proposed WA ‘jock tax’
Speculation about a potential Seahawks sale has intensified amid debate over a proposed Washington income tax that would apply to high-earning athletes and performers. - Gov. Ferguson rejects WA lawmakers’ initial crack at income tax legislation
Gov. Bob Ferguson said he cannot support the Legislature’s initial income tax proposal, arguing it fails to return enough revenue to Washington residents for tax relief. - Opinion: Washington’s proposed income tax – driving businesses and jobs out of the state
Mark Harmsworth argues that Washington’s proposed income tax would undermine the state’s economy by driving businesses, investment, and jobs elsewhere. - House Environment and Energy Committee unanimously approves legislation from Rep. John Ley
The House Environment and Energy Committee unanimously advanced Rep. John Ley’s bill updating regulations on naturally occurring fibrous silicate materials used in construction. - Mitchell Kelly announces candidacy for Clark County auditor
Mitchell Kelly announced his candidacy for Clark County auditor, citing nearly a decade of experience in the Auditor’s Office and a focus on election integrity and financial transparency. - Opinion: Let’s use the truancy laws to send a message to schools
Lars Larson argues that truancy laws should be enforced when schools allow or encourage students to miss class for political protests. - Opinion: WA GOP state representative asking Trump Administration to investigate fraud allegations
Bill Bruch argues that state and federal authorities should investigate alleged fraud and accountability failures in Washington’s taxpayer-subsidized childcare programs.
Ridiculous. Forcing others to pay people who refuse to go to work is simply wrong.
We truly live in a socialist state. Take money from those who are working to pay those who are refusing to work.