Democrats are ending their bid to repeal a voter-approved limit on property tax growth

Jerry Cornfield
Washington State Standard

The property tax battle of 2025 is over in the Washington state Legislature.

Democrats are ending their bid to repeal a voter-approved limit on property tax growth, excising one of the most controversial revenue-raising ideas they’ve pursued this session.

The proposal, embedded in House Bill 2049, seeks to allow an increase in the growth factor from the current 1% cap to the combined rate of population growth plus inflation within a taxing district, not to exceed 3%. This would apply to the state’s common schools levy and for cities and counties, as well as special purpose districts.

A fiscal analysis projected that uncapping the state property tax would net an additional $200 million for public schools and potentially $236 million for local governments in the next budget. The bill passed the House Finance Committee on Saturday and is expected to be voted on by the House today.

But Rep. Steve Bergquist, D-Renton, the bill’s sponsor, filed an amendment Sunday to remove sections on the growth limit, effectively ending Democrats’ pursuit of the change.

“It’s my understanding we don’t have a three-corners agreement on those provisions,” Bergquist said Monday morning.

Three-corners refers to the Democratic leadership of the House, Senate and Democratic Gov. Bob Ferguson.

Ferguson declined to discuss the conversations but said shelving the property tax plan was the correct move.

“We have to look at a lot of revenue sources, and I think we need to minimize the impacts on working people in the state,” he said Monday morning. “So I think they made the right decision.”

Without the property tax change, the bill will be focused on education funding and providing school districts with the ability to collect more revenue from voter-approved local levies.

From the outset of the session — now just six days from ending — Democrats’ desire to increase the limit has been fiercely opposed by Republican lawmakers and others who warned the measure would drive up living and housing costs.

A year ago, Senate Democrats pushed to erase the cap solely for cities and counties. It too ran into a buzzsaw of opposition, forcing the majority party to set it down.

This report was first published by The Washington State Standard.

---

Also read:

• 
  Coast Guard approves fixed-span design for new Interstate Bridge
  The U.S. Coast Guard has approved a fixed-span design for the new Interstate Bridge, clearing a major hurdle for the Interstate Bridge Replacement project.
• 
  Opinion: Why vote no on the Battle Ground School District levy?
  Dick Rylander outlines why he believes voters should reject the Battle Ground School District levy, citing costs, enrollment trends, test results, and district spending priorities.
• 
  County Elections provides important information for upcoming special election
  Clark County Elections has released key dates and instructions for voters ahead of the Feb. 10 Special Election, including ballot mailing, registration deadlines, and drop box hours.
• 
  POLL: What should be the top priority for lawmakers during the 2026 legislative session?
  Clark County Today’s weekly poll asks readers to weigh in on which issue Washington lawmakers should prioritize as the 2026 legislative session approaches.
• 
  C-TRAN votes for Board Composition Review Committee to reconvene
  The C-TRAN Board of Directors voted to send the issue of board representation back to the Board Composition Review Committee as disputes continue over compliance with state law and potential grant funding losses.