
Rep Chris Corry says a Democratic plan of giving cities and counties the ability to increase property taxes by 3 percent a year to raise more revenue is not the way to go
Carleen Johnson
The Center Square Washington
As Washington state Democrats push for a three-fold increase in property taxes to raise revenue for cities and counties, a member of the minority Republican party suggests he has “a better way that does not raise taxes.”
Rep Chris Corry, R-Yakima, says a Democratic plan of giving cities and counties the ability to increase property taxes by 3% a year – compared to the current 1% cap – to raise more revenue is not the way to go.
Instead, Corry’s HB 2336 would reduce the state sales tax by one-half percent and let local governments raise revenues through a voter approved one-half percent sales tax
“I am pushing for a hearing but am not getting any positive feedback right now, though I think this is a great alternative to just go ahead and telling cities and counties raise property taxes. This is net-neutral to the taxpayers which is important to me, especially when you look at ballooning budgets.”
Corry pointed to the fact Washington state has a 3-billion dollar budget surplus and said, “If some of our local cities and counties are struggling we need to give them the option of being able to fund a lot of the mandates we’ve put on them through the last several years.”
“It’s really easy for us in Olympia to say, “go ahead we’ll remove that cap for you,” but that doesn’t address the realities that a lot of our local elected officials are facing.”
During a Tuesday briefing with reporters, Democratic Majority Leaders were pressed on the housing affordability crisis.
“I think everybody would like to see predictability in their budget, said Joe Fitzgibbon, D-Burien. “On one hand I think we hear from folks who say a 3% increase for property taxes is too much, but a 15% increase in rents is too low.”
Corry tells The Center Square, “In a state that has a 3-billion dollar surplus we can fund priorities while also providing some direct tax relief or the ability for cities and counties to not have to come to us asking for money they can do directly.”
His bill was referred to the House Local Government Committee but has yet to receive a hearing, with Feb. 1 being the deadline for bills to pass out of the committee they are referred to.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Clark College officially opens Advanced Manufacturing Center in RidgefieldClark College marked the official opening of its Advanced Manufacturing Center in Ridgefield, a new facility focused on training students for careers in advanced manufacturing.
- POLL: With updated estimates reaching as high as $17.7 billion, what should happen to the I-5 Bridge replacement project?A new poll asks readers how the I-5 Bridge replacement project should proceed amid higher cost estimates and questions about transparency within the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program.
- Letter: ‘Walz’s tough talk is a blatant attempt to deflect his complicity in the massive fraud in his state’Camas resident Anna Miller argues that a governor has no legal authority to deploy the National Guard to interfere with federal law enforcement and criticizes Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz’s public statements.
- VIDEO: Reykdal tells school districts to ‘abide by the law’ on trans athletesState Superintendent Chris Reykdal said Washington school districts must follow state law on transgender athletes as citizen initiatives and related Supreme Court cases move forward.
- County seeks community needs survey responses from residentsClark County Community Services is collecting survey responses from residents living on limited incomes to inform its required Community Needs Assessment and guide funding priorities for anti-poverty services.
- Opinion: Not a Good choiceLars Larson argues that personal choices led to a deadly confrontation with law enforcement during an ICE operation in Minneapolis.
- County Charter Review Commission to hold first two meetings in JanuaryThe Clark County Charter Review Commission will meet twice in January to begin reviewing the county’s charter and consider whether to recommend amendments for voter approval.








