
The three measures are I-2081 to establish a parental bill of rights relating to their children’s public school education, I-2111 to prohibit state and local governments from enacting a personal income tax, and I-2113 to remove certain restrictions on when police officers may engage in vehicular pursuits
Carleen Johnson
The Center Square Washington
Washington state Democrats have signaled a willingness to pass three initiatives to the Legislature scheduled for public hearings next week.
The three measures getting public hearings are Initiative 2081 to establish a parental bill of rights relating to their children’s public school education, Initiative 2111 to prohibit state and local governments from enacting a personal income tax, and Initiative 2113 to remove certain restrictions on when police officers may engage in vehicular pursuits.
I-2111 will receive a hearing on Tuesday, Feb. 27, from 12:30 p.m. to 1:30 p.m. I-2081 will receive a hearing on Wednesday, Feb. 28, from 8 am. to 9 a.m. I-2113 will receive a hearing on Wednesday, Feb. 28, from 9 a.m. to 10 a.m.
“I expect all three initiatives that are having hearings to end up passing this session,” Sen. Mark Mullet, D-Issaquah, told The Center Square Thursday.
Mullet is a member of the House Education Committee that will consider I-2081.
Mullet, a father of six whose wife is an elementary teacher, says he is a yes vote on the measure.
Asked about the other two initiatives to get hearings, Mullet said, “As for police pursuits, I’ve been trying to get something passed here for years, and I was actually thrilled to see the initiative.”
He concluded, “We should have done this two years ago.”
Sen. Lisa Wellman, D-Mercer Island, chairs the Senate Education Committee.
She spoke to The Center Square in between voting on multiple bills on the Senate floor, saying she is likely to support I-2081.
“I think I’m okay with the initiative, but I haven’t seen anything that isn’t already in state law,” Wellman said, referencing a publication, “K-12 Parents’ Bill of Rights,” produced by her office.
As of Thursday afternoon at 3pm, there were 769 people who had signed up to offer written testimony or request to testify on I-2081. More than 97.7% of those signed up were listed as being in favor of the initiative.
Mullet said he also expects enough Democrats will end up supporting I-2111, the Income Tax measure, to get the Initiative passed.
I-2113 is also likely to pass out of the Legislature, some Democratic lawmakers said. That is the measure to remove some restrictions on police pursuits.
The three measures not getting public hearings are Initiative 2109 to repeal the capital gains tax, Initiative 2117 to repeal the Climate Commitment Act, and Initiative 2124 to allow more people to opt out of the state’s long-term care program.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Vancouver Police investigate fatality collisionVancouver Police are investigating a vehicle versus pedestrian collision on NE 162nd Avenue near NE Poplar Street that resulted in a fatality.
- Washington governor talks potential return of SuperSonics with NBA commissionerGov. Bob Ferguson spoke with NBA Commissioner Adam Silver about the possibility of bringing the Seattle SuperSonics back as the league weighs future expansion decisions.
- Opinion: The income tax proposal has arrivedRyan Frost of the Washington Policy Center argues that a proposed Washington income tax creates a new revenue stream rather than delivering tax reform or relief.
- Is it time to lower the legal limit for blood alcohol content to 0.05 in the state of Washington?Mothers Against Drunk Driving and families affected by impaired driving are urging Washington lawmakers to lower the legal BAC limit to 0.05, citing prevention data and personal testimony from Clark County residents.
- Expert in homebuilding has several tips on how to make housing affordableVeteran homebuilder Tracy Doriot shares his perspective on why regulations, taxes, labor shortages, and permitting delays are driving housing costs higher in Clark County and across Washington.
- Opinion: ‘If they want light rail, they should be the ones who pay for it’Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance argues that supporters of light rail tied to the I-5 Bridge replacement should bear the local cost of operating and maintaining the system through a narrowly drawn sub-district.
- POLL: If a sub-district is created, what area should it include?Clark County residents are asked where a potential C-TRAN sub-district should be drawn if voters are asked to fund light rail operations and maintenance costs.








