Initiative 2117, which would have repealed the Climate Commitment Act passed by lawmakers in 2021, was rejected by 61.7% of voters in Tuesday night returns
Carleen Johnson
The Center Square Washington
Washington voters have chosen to keep the state’s controversial cap-and-trade program that critics say substantially raised fuel prices while generating billions of dollars, ostensibly to fight climate change.
Initiative 2117, which would have repealed the Climate Commitment Act passed by lawmakers in 2021, was rejected by 61.7% of voters in Tuesday night returns.
Just over 38% of voters supported the measure.
“These numbers can change but I don’t know if we’ve got enough ‘gas in tank’ to flip this over,” said Brian Heywood, founder of Let’s Go Washington, the conservative political group that backed the measure, during a Tuesday night election party in Kirkland.
The CCA, which went into effect at the beginning of 2023, provides for carbon auctions as part of a program designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 95% by 2050. Under the CCA, emitters are required to obtain emissions allowances equal to their covered greenhouse gas emissions at quarterly auctions hosted by the state Department of Ecology, or traded on a secondary market, like stocks and bonds.
Backers of the NO on 2117 campaign claimed the initiative had the potential to reduce state revenue by $3.9 billion through 2029 and would eliminate investments in public transit, pedestrian safety, ferry electrification, air quality, renewable energy, and more.
Opponents of the CCA were critical of the lack of transparency and accountability regarding how CCA money is being spent and what it would cost Washingtonians.
When the CCA took effect in the summer of 2023, gas prices in Washington shot up as much as 50 cents a gallon, something critics blasted Gov. Jay Inslee over as he had stated the mandates would impact gas prices by “pennies” at most.
No on 2117 backers argued CCA-funded projects provide thousands of family wage jobs.
According to Greenline Insights, jobs created by the CCA offer an average employee compensation of $91,000 per year, which is 9% higher than the state median.
The third-quarter auction for the carbon market was conducted on Sept. 4 and ended up with a $29.88 price per allowance, far less than the state projected. The auction raised an estimated $157 million.
Backers of the NO on 2117 campaign claimed the initiative had the potential to reduce state revenue by $3.9 billion through 2029 and would eliminate investments in public transit, pedestrian safety, ferry electrification, air quality, renewable energy, and more.
Opponents of the CCA were critical of the lack of transparency and accountability regarding how CCA money is being spent and what it would cost Washingtonians.
When the CCA took effect in the summer of 2023, gas prices in Washington shot up as much as 50 cents a gallon, something critics blasted Gov. Jay Inslee over as he had stated the mandates would impact gas prices by “pennies” at most.
No on 2117 backers argued CCA-funded projects provide thousands of family wage jobs.
According to Greenline Insights, jobs created by the CCA offer an average employee compensation of $91,000 per year, which is 9% higher than the state median.
The third-quarter auction for the carbon market was conducted on Sept. 4 and ended up with a $29.88 price per allowance, far less than the state projected. The auction raised an estimated $157 million.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Opinion: Washington passed an income tax to fund education, then the same majority cut education — and left $700+ million on the table
State officials passed a new income tax to fund education, then approved over $1 billion in cuts—while forgoing $700 million in annual federal scholarships students could have received. - Opinion: ‘Washington’s majority party is panicking’
Nancy Churchill argues that controversial state policies, including new taxes, law enforcement changes, and agency power grabs, are generating a wave of backlash in communities across Washington. - Letter: ‘Now we have Engineer Bob telling us the I-5 Bridge needs replacing because it is built on shifting sand with wooden structures’
Amboy resident Thomas Schenk critiques Democrat leadership, tax policies, and the addition of light rail to the I-5 Bridge, while urging Republican voters to participate more in midterm elections. - The I-5 Bridge is vulnerable to collapse, but apparently not that vulnerable
State leaders and Vancouver’s mayor warn about bridge safety, but insist it’s safe enough for daily use as they focus on moving forward with a costly replacement including light rail—despite decades of public resistance. - Opinion: ‘This is not the best and most efficient use of the taxpayers’ funds’
Ken Vance critiques the announced $14.4 billion I-5 Bridge replacement, questioning funding gaps, the insistence on light rail, unaddressed congestion, and transparency from state officials.
