
Under the proposed increase, owners of a $500,000 home would pay an estimated $75 per year or about $6.25 a month
VANCOUVER – On Monday (Oct. 20), the Vancouver City Council unanimously approved a resolution expressing support for the Police Services Levy, Proposition 5, which is on the ballot for the Nov. 4 General Election. Consistent with state law, the City Council may express a collective position regarding any ballot proposition. By passing Resolution 5.42.17A.555 the Council has expressed its support for Proposition 5.

“Vancouver operates the second-lowest staffed police department among cities our size, and Proposition 5 will help us meet the growing demands on police services,” said Mayor Anne McEnerny-Ogle. “The Council’s unanimous endorsement reflects our shared commitment to investing in community safety and ensuring our officers have the resources they need to serve effectively.”
The levy lid lift would increase Vancouver’s regular property tax by $0.15 per $1,000 assessed value, for a rate not to exceed $2.47 per $1,000 assessed value. Under the proposed increase, owners of a $500,000 home would pay an estimated $75 per year or about $6.25 a month. The levy is anticipated to raise $6 million annually over six years starting in 2026. The amount approved will be used for calculating future levies.
If passed, the Police Services Levy will cover only the cost of hiring police officers and what it takes to support them across the justice system.
- Add up to 13 full-time equivalent sworn police officers in a range of ranks and assignments
- The equipment and vehicles for new staff consistent with current and future policing standards
- Administrative and staffing costs to support the investments in officers and equipment
- Additional prosecution and criminal justice costs
Ballots must be deposited into an official ballot drop site by 8 p.m. on Nov. 5. To find an official ballot drop site, visit clark.wa.gov/elections.
Information provided by the city of Vancouver.
Also read:
- League of Women Voters interviews 3rd Congressional candidatesEight of nine 3rd Congressional District candidates sat for League of Women Voters video interviews ahead of the Aug. 4 primary.
- Letter: Local politicians have ignored repeated votes against light rail and a county resolution opposing light railClark County voters rejected light rail in 2012 and again passed a 68% advisory vote against it in 2013 — but the fight continues.
- Letter: ‘Our local leaders should be advocating and making those opportunities countywide to translate into housing opportunities for our veterans’A Clark County Army veteran argues HUD-VASH vouchers fail veterans when landlords countywide won’t accept them.
- Charter Review Commission 26-10: Revised Budget Transparency ProcessA 12-3 vote advances a charter amendment requiring the county’s $880M+ budget process to begin in September.
- County fire marshal implements burn ban beginning July 15Clark County’s burn ban takes effect July 15 — and all previously issued burning permits are being rescinded immediately.
- Opinion: C-TRAN outpaces TriMet – Strong finances and growing ridership, but a cautionary note on costs and efficiencyC-TRAN’s farebox recovery has dropped from 17% in 2017 to just 4.2% in 2025, even as reserves top $201 million.
- Charter Review Commission 26-08: Supermajority Council Approval for County TaxesAmendment 26-08 passed 8-7 and would require four of five Clark County Council members to approve any new or increased councilmatic tax.








