
The measure approved by lawmakers back in March was introduced by a voter initiative
Carleen Johnson
The Center Square Washington
A new parents bill of rights took effect Thursday in Washington, but State Superintendent of Public Instruction Chris Reykdal is telling school districts to ignore it.
The measure approved by lawmakers back in March was introduced by a voter initiative.
Supporters said it was a way to ensure parents don’t feel left out of their child’s education and, among other things, have access to medical or counseling records if children are questioning gender identity or sexual orientation.
During a March public hearing on the bill, Jennifer Heine-Withee, with the Family Policy Institute, listed stories of parents who felt their rights were ignored by teachers and schools across the state, including children being taught about race, gender pronouns and sexuality.
But the law has received backlash from the ACLU and LGBTQ groups, who last month filed a lawsuit arguing that students and school districts will be harmed because of it.
Reykdal’s office, in a news release issued Wednesday, suggested there are protections in federal law that the parental rights bill is in conflict with.
“Some of these records contain personal information and are protected under the Federal Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), and as such, cannot be disclosed without the student’s consent,” read the release.
OSPI has asked Washington’s 295 school districts not to implement the new law.
“There is no question that students are best supported when their families are actively involved in their education,” Reykdal continued. “But if a student does not feel safe coming out to their family and they turn to a trusted adult at their school for support, they have a right to receive that support without fear of being outed by their school.”
An email from an OSPI spokesperson says in part: “Until these conflicts are clarified—either in the court or by the Legislature—we have asked school districts not to make changes to any policies or procedures related to student privacy.”
Washington Policy Center’s Education Center Director Liv Finne tells The Center Square, Reykdal’s position on this is out of line.
“It’s breathtaking,” said Finne. “Superintendent Reykdal has crowned himself Supreme Ruler of Education Policy in Washington State. Above the people, the legislature and now the courts.”
WA GOP Chair Jim Walsh posted a response on Facebook that says in part: “The cynical thing about Reykdal encouraging public school districts to break the law is that he faces little (direct) consequence. The districts will be the ones sued and held liable if they follow his dumb advice. WA school districts: Ignore Chris Reykdal. Do the right thing. Follow the law.”
The lawsuit challenging the new law was filed 2 weeks ago and this week King County Superior Court denied the plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order, which would have blocked it from taking effect Thursday.
On June 21, the Court will consider a preliminary injunction.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Vancouver Police investigate fatality collisionVancouver Police are investigating a vehicle versus pedestrian collision on NE 162nd Avenue near NE Poplar Street that resulted in a fatality.
- Washington governor talks potential return of SuperSonics with NBA commissionerGov. Bob Ferguson spoke with NBA Commissioner Adam Silver about the possibility of bringing the Seattle SuperSonics back as the league weighs future expansion decisions.
- Opinion: The income tax proposal has arrivedRyan Frost of the Washington Policy Center argues that a proposed Washington income tax creates a new revenue stream rather than delivering tax reform or relief.
- Is it time to lower the legal limit for blood alcohol content to 0.05 in the state of Washington?Mothers Against Drunk Driving and families affected by impaired driving are urging Washington lawmakers to lower the legal BAC limit to 0.05, citing prevention data and personal testimony from Clark County residents.
- Expert in homebuilding has several tips on how to make housing affordableVeteran homebuilder Tracy Doriot shares his perspective on why regulations, taxes, labor shortages, and permitting delays are driving housing costs higher in Clark County and across Washington.
- Opinion: ‘If they want light rail, they should be the ones who pay for it’Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance argues that supporters of light rail tied to the I-5 Bridge replacement should bear the local cost of operating and maintaining the system through a narrowly drawn sub-district.
- POLL: If a sub-district is created, what area should it include?Clark County residents are asked where a potential C-TRAN sub-district should be drawn if voters are asked to fund light rail operations and maintenance costs.









I made the correction that the Superintendent meant to say!
Reykdal continued. “But if a student does not feel safe coming out to their family and they turn to a trusted GROOMER at their school for support, they have a right to receive that support without fear of being outed by their school.”