
If certified, the initiative would get sent to the Legislature at the next regular session
Carleen Johnson
The Center Square Washington
Backers of an initiative to the Legislature requiring proof of citizenship to vote in Washington state say opponents are trying to confuse the public and spread misinformation about the measure.
Initiative Measure No. IL26-126 is sponsored by Rep. Jim Walsh, R-Aberdeen, the Chair of the Washington State Republican Party.
“IL26-126 does one thing: It requires proof of identity when people register to vote in Washington,” Walsh told The Center Square. “Just like when you get on an airplane. That’s it.”
Walsh was critical of a new numbering system for initiatives to the Legislature, which took effect on March 9, 2024.
According to the Washington Secretary of State’s Office, the new system works like this:
When a sponsor submits the final text of a proposed Initiative to the Legislature, it receives a random three-digit number.
This number is determined by rolling three 10-sided dice.
The full identification number is eight characters long, starting with “IL,” followed by the last two digits of the year the Legislature will review the initiative, a hyphen, and the random three-digit number.
If a number has been used before, the dice are rolled again until a unique number is generated.”
“I think that the secretary of state has rejiggered its numbering standards to make initiatives harder to publicize and promote,” Walsh speculated.
The Center Square emailed the SoS to inquire about the new numbering system, but did not receive a response.
The initiative seeks to require residents to establish their status as U.S. citizens with documentation, like a passport or birth certificate. County election officials would confer with the Department of Licensing to ensure that everyone on the voter rolls was actually a citizen.
Voters who had not produced proof would be notified and given notice to provide needed documents or be taken off the list of eligible voters before the 2027 general election.
According to the SoS, to vote in Washington, people must prove they are at least 18 years old, live in the state, and be a U.S. citizen.
“Bob Ferguson and other sanctuary state supporters are lying and spreading misinformation about what IL26-126 does,” Walsh continued. “Lawlessness breeds lawlessness. We’ve had too much of that. Let’s get back to enforcing the law. IL26-126 helps with that healing.”
Walsh said IL26-126 seeks to require proof of citizenship and nothing more.
“The initiative doesn’t end vote-by-mail,” he said. “It doesn’t touch ballot processing. Just voter identification.”
While several states are considering measures to restrict or eliminate certain aspects of vote-by-mail, Walsh claims that is not his motivation for this initiative.
However, the Washington State Republican Party recently joined the regional movement to end vote-by-mail, complicating matters.
Washington Attorney General Nick Brown has stated that Washington has a secure and fair election system.
The conservative Heritage Foundation recently released its latest “Election Integrity Scorecard,” which examines factors such as voter identification implementation, voter list accuracy, absentee ballot management, citizenship verification and other relevant attributes.
Washington ranked 46th out of 50 states and Washington, D.C. Only Nevada, Oregon, Vermont, California and Hawaii ranked worse.
Walsh said supporters expect to start gathering signatures for the initiative in about 10 days.
To get IL26-126 on the ballot, signatures of at least 308,911 registered voters must be collected and submitted by 5 p.m. on Jan. 2, 2026.
If certified, the initiative would get sent to the Legislature at the next regular session.
Lawmakers would then have to decide between three options: adopting the initiative as proposed; rejecting or taking no action, in which case the initiative is placed on the ballot for voters to decide at the next general election; approving an alternative to the proposed initiative so that both are placed on the ballot for voters to consider at the next general election.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Fort Vancouver athletics improving under partnership with Trico LeagueFort Vancouver High School athletics are showing measurable gains in competition and participation during the second year of a partnership competing in the Class 1A Trico League.
- Opinion: Inviting courts into health care policy discussionElizabeth New (Hovde) warns that Senate Joint Resolution 8206 could invite lawsuits by placing vague health care mandates into Washington’s Constitution.
- Opinion: 24 States In. Washington Out? $732 Million Lost?Vicki Murray argues Washington risks forfeiting $732 million in federal education funding if state leaders do not opt into the federal tax-credit scholarship program.
- C-TRAN offering free service on Transit Equity Day, Feb. 4C-TRAN will offer free service across its entire system on February 4 in observance of Transit Equity Day, honoring the legacy of Rosa Parks.
- City of Battle Ground prepares for 75th Anniversary CelebrationThe City of Battle Ground is marking the 75th anniversary of its incorporation with a year-long series of community activities and celebrations planned throughout 2026.
- Opinion: Nationwide strike in support of illegals and opposing the rule of law?Lars Larson argues that a reported nationwide strike reflects opposition to immigration enforcement and the rule of law, criticizing political leaders and media coverage.
- POLL: Should councilors serving on boards be required to vote the way the full council decides?A new poll asks whether Clark County councilors serving on boards should be required to vote in line with the full council’s position or retain independent judgment.









I went and looked at the Heritage Foundation rankings and the criteria/questions they used to justify their ranking. It’s pretty clear to me that there are several of their criteria that they marked with a score of zero are criteria that just don’t apply to how elections are administered here. For instance, there are several of the criteria under the Absentee Ballot section that they scored with a zero that just don’t apply to our system at all. I think that if they cleaned up some of these things, our ranking would jump up quite a bit higher.