
If certified, the initiative would get sent to the Legislature at the next regular session
Carleen Johnson
The Center Square Washington
Backers of an initiative to the Legislature requiring proof of citizenship to vote in Washington state say opponents are trying to confuse the public and spread misinformation about the measure.
Initiative Measure No. IL26-126 is sponsored by Rep. Jim Walsh, R-Aberdeen, the Chair of the Washington State Republican Party.
“IL26-126 does one thing: It requires proof of identity when people register to vote in Washington,” Walsh told The Center Square. “Just like when you get on an airplane. That’s it.”
Walsh was critical of a new numbering system for initiatives to the Legislature, which took effect on March 9, 2024.
According to the Washington Secretary of State’s Office, the new system works like this:
When a sponsor submits the final text of a proposed Initiative to the Legislature, it receives a random three-digit number.
This number is determined by rolling three 10-sided dice.
The full identification number is eight characters long, starting with “IL,” followed by the last two digits of the year the Legislature will review the initiative, a hyphen, and the random three-digit number.
If a number has been used before, the dice are rolled again until a unique number is generated.”
“I think that the secretary of state has rejiggered its numbering standards to make initiatives harder to publicize and promote,” Walsh speculated.
The Center Square emailed the SoS to inquire about the new numbering system, but did not receive a response.
The initiative seeks to require residents to establish their status as U.S. citizens with documentation, like a passport or birth certificate. County election officials would confer with the Department of Licensing to ensure that everyone on the voter rolls was actually a citizen.
Voters who had not produced proof would be notified and given notice to provide needed documents or be taken off the list of eligible voters before the 2027 general election.
According to the SoS, to vote in Washington, people must prove they are at least 18 years old, live in the state, and be a U.S. citizen.
“Bob Ferguson and other sanctuary state supporters are lying and spreading misinformation about what IL26-126 does,” Walsh continued. “Lawlessness breeds lawlessness. We’ve had too much of that. Let’s get back to enforcing the law. IL26-126 helps with that healing.”
Walsh said IL26-126 seeks to require proof of citizenship and nothing more.
“The initiative doesn’t end vote-by-mail,” he said. “It doesn’t touch ballot processing. Just voter identification.”
While several states are considering measures to restrict or eliminate certain aspects of vote-by-mail, Walsh claims that is not his motivation for this initiative.
However, the Washington State Republican Party recently joined the regional movement to end vote-by-mail, complicating matters.
Washington Attorney General Nick Brown has stated that Washington has a secure and fair election system.
The conservative Heritage Foundation recently released its latest “Election Integrity Scorecard,” which examines factors such as voter identification implementation, voter list accuracy, absentee ballot management, citizenship verification and other relevant attributes.
Washington ranked 46th out of 50 states and Washington, D.C. Only Nevada, Oregon, Vermont, California and Hawaii ranked worse.
Walsh said supporters expect to start gathering signatures for the initiative in about 10 days.
To get IL26-126 on the ballot, signatures of at least 308,911 registered voters must be collected and submitted by 5 p.m. on Jan. 2, 2026.
If certified, the initiative would get sent to the Legislature at the next regular session.
Lawmakers would then have to decide between three options: adopting the initiative as proposed; rejecting or taking no action, in which case the initiative is placed on the ballot for voters to decide at the next general election; approving an alternative to the proposed initiative so that both are placed on the ballot for voters to consider at the next general election.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- POLL: If a sub-district is created, what area should it include?Clark County residents are asked where a potential C-TRAN sub-district should be drawn if voters are asked to fund light rail operations and maintenance costs.
- Trump Education Department bolsters protections for prayer in schoolsThe U.S. Department of Education issued new guidance reinforcing individual prayer rights in public schools while reiterating limits on school-sponsored religious activity.
- Opinion: IBR falsely blaming inflationJoe Cortright argues that inflation explains only a small portion of the IBR project’s cost increases and that rising consultant and staff expenses are the primary drivers.
- Letter: The Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s $141 million bribe can be better spent on sandwich steel-concrete tubesBob Ortblad argues that an immersed tunnel using sandwich steel-concrete tubes would be a more cost-effective alternative to the current Interstate Bridge Replacement Program design.
- Opinion: Washingtonians want affordability, not more taxes, according to our recent surveyRep. John Ley shares results from a legislative survey showing affordability concerns and opposition to new taxes among respondents, while outlining Republican priorities in Olympia.
- Washougal City Council appoints David L. Szyplinski to fill Position 5The Washougal City Council appointed David L. Szyplinski to fill the vacant Position 5 seat following the death of longtime council member and former mayor Molly Coston.
- Opinion: Schumer insults black Americans with ‘Jim Crow 2.0’ commentLars Larson argues that Democratic opposition to the SAVE Act contradicts voter support for photo ID requirements and unfairly characterizes minority voters.









I went and looked at the Heritage Foundation rankings and the criteria/questions they used to justify their ranking. It’s pretty clear to me that there are several of their criteria that they marked with a score of zero are criteria that just don’t apply to how elections are administered here. For instance, there are several of the criteria under the Absentee Ballot section that they scored with a zero that just don’t apply to our system at all. I think that if they cleaned up some of these things, our ranking would jump up quite a bit higher.