The change, recommended by the Washington Policy for the last several years, is welcome and improves transparency into the legislative process
Mark Harmsworth
Washington Policy Center
Former Washington Policy Center (WPC) Director, Jason Mercier, finally saw Friday the practice of introducing title-only bills to avoid House rules on bill introductions, banned in the Washington House of Representatives. The Senate changed their rules several years ago. Mr. Mercier has for years recommended the change to improve government transparency.
In a series of rule changes, the House leadership added the section to ban title-only bills, now requiring at least section 1, typically the pre-ample to the bill, be included.
Title-only bills have been used in the past to introduce legislation to avoid session cutoff dates or avoid stating the full intent of the bill until the last minute. Title-only bills are essentially blank pieces of paper that provide a placeholder for action later in the legislative session. Not only are title-only bills not the norm across the country, they basically exist to circumvent Washington’s state constitutional protection for transparency on new bills introduced in the last 10 days of session. Budget bills are often introduced as title-only which severally limits the ability of a legislator to read through the budget prior to a vote.
The change ends the prior legislative games played to circumvent the bill transparency requirements guaranteed by Article 2, Section 36 of the state constitution.
The change, recommended by the Washington Policy for the last several years, is welcome and improves transparency into the legislative process.
Mark Harmsworth is the director of the Small Business Center at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Fiscal fallout: $375 million bond debt indirectly funding operating budget
Shifting $375 million from a loan fund impacts local infrastructure as Washington state covers operating costs with bond debt, prompting concern among officials and advocacy groups. - Lawsuit aims to block new eligibility requirements for WA sheriffs
Four sheriffs are suing over a state law that sets new eligibility rules, arguing it undermines voter authority by allowing removal for certification issues. - Opinion: The growing gap between public voice and political power
Todd Myers describes how large-scale protest and sign-ins often fail to sway state leaders, and argues authentic influence is most likely found through local action. - Opinion: Who is winning the race for affordable power?
Hydroelectric power keeps Washington competitive, but new laws and carbon pricing are driving up electricity costs for residents each year. - White House govt. Funding request for 2027 cuts $73 billion
President Trump’s budget seeks to boost defense funding while cutting $73 billion from agencies like the EPA, NASA, and Agriculture, prompting sharp criticism from Democratic leaders.
