Todd Myers believes Washington should stop wasting billions of taxpayer dollars on politically chosen climate projects and put power in the hands of innovative companies and families
Todd Myers
Washington Policy Center
Washington residents place a premium on environmental protection and the reduction of carbon emissions, but the latest data shows that official claims that Washington state is a “leader” in climate policy are simply not true.
Washington’s CO2 newly released emissions data for 2020 and 2021 show a significant increase in emissions during Governor Inslee’s first nine years. Four key things stand out about the data:
- CO2 emissions between 2012 and 2021 increased by nearly 5 percent – even after the COVID lockdown.
- Washington’s 2021 CO2 emissions are 6 percent higher than the 2020 target set in state law, which makes it extremely difficult to meet the strict 2030 goal.
- To meet the 2030 CO2 targets, Washington residents will have to reduce emissions by the equivalent of more than three additional COVID-sized shutdowns from 2022 to 2030.
- The Department of Ecology’s release is in violation of state law which requires that “By December 31st of each even-numbered year beginning in 2010, the department and the department of commerce shall report … greenhouse gases for the preceding two years.” The agency should have also released data for 2022 and 2023. (*The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has already released CO2 emissions data for 2022 for all states – including Washington.)
Climate regulations and the billions spent on politically selected climate projects over the past twelve years added cost but did not produce results. This failure of top-down climate policy during Governor Inslee’s first nine years puts Washington residents in the position of having to make drastic cuts to meet the 2030 CO2 target. Washington now has a CO2 tax designed to accelerate emissions reduction to meet those targets. Unfortunately, the billions in new tax revenue generated by that tax are being spent in the same wasteful and unaccountable way that led to the state’s failed climate results. Politicians should target expenditures based on results, not political agendas or return the revenue to taxpayers.
The fact that the most recent CO2 data is three years old is a clear indication that political leaders and agency staff simply don’t have the information necessary to make rational decisions about effective climate policy. By way of contrast, Microsoft releases a more comprehensive accounting of its CO2 emissions data within months of the end of the year.
Washington’s leaders need to learn the lesson of this failure and become serious about reducing emissions.
Washington should stop wasting billions of taxpayer dollars on politically chosen climate projects and put power in the hands of innovative companies and families.
Todd Myers is the vice president for research at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Letter: Public school vision
Clark County resident Larry Roe urges a deeper community discussion about public school priorities, levy funding, and the long-term affordability of education for local families. - Opinion: House Bill 1834 would create a regulatory nightmare and restricts parental control on social media
Mark Harmsworth argues that House Bill 1834 would undermine parental authority and create sweeping regulatory and legal risks under the guise of protecting minors online. - Opinion: HB 2100 – Tax employers for paying people well? It’s for the needy, sorta
Elizabeth New (Hovde) argues House Bill 2100 would raise costs, discourage job growth, and expand state spending power under the banner of helping people in need. - Opinion: IBR’s evasive, misleading and dishonest excuses for higher cost
Joe Cortright argues the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program has withheld detailed cost estimates while offering contradictory explanations for rising costs tied to the I-5 Bridge project. - Opinion: The limits for drug-impaired driving
Target Zero Manager Doug Dahl explains how Washington law defines drug-impaired driving and how officers are trained to recognize impairment beyond alcohol limits.
