
The measures were advanced under Washington’s direct-democracy initiative law, which allows the people to propose bills to the legislature for consideration
Paul Guppy
Washington Policy Center
One of the most common sentiments heard these days is that elected officials don’t listen to us. That’s not the case, however, with three popular initiatives the legislature passed recently by large bipartisan margins, moving our state forward in rebuilding trust in our public institutions.

The measures were advanced under Washington’s direct-democracy initiative law, which allows the people to propose bills to the legislature for consideration. Each proposal garnered over 430,000 signatures, or at least 100,000 more than each one needed to qualify.
First to pass was Initiative 2111, to ban state and local income taxes. The proposal grew out of popular concern after lawmakers passed, and vigorously defended all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, the state’s first-ever income tax on capital gains. It doesn’t take much imagination to see that, unless stopped, a future legislature would quickly expand this “high-earners” tax to the rest of us.
Easy passage of Initiative 2111 again confirmed that few political ideas are less popular in our state than an income tax. Voters have rejected it 10 times, most recently in 2010 by a crushing 64%. An income tax is about as popular here as a COVID-era school closure, and now the ban ensures that state and local politicians, if they’re smart, will go nowhere near it.
Next to pass was Initiative 2081, to establish parental rights in public schools. At one time school officials dealing fairly with parents was taken as a given. No longer. Practices like mandating sexualized curriculum, infusing Critical Race Theory into daily lessons, violating student privacy, and hiding sensitive medical information from parents has badly eroded the once-dependable reputation of public education.
The intent of Initiative 2081 is to restore the community’s trust in schools by requiring that officials be honest with parents. The measure requires schools to work closely with parents as educational partners, rather than perceiving them as a threat to a cultural agenda promoted by radical school officials.
Interestingly, conservative rural and suburban Republicans were joined by their far-left urban colleagues in voting for the measure. The bipartisan agreement will go a long way in alleviating the deep-seated wariness many parents experience when school officials treat them in a dismissive or deceptive way.
Lastly, lawmakers passed Initiative 2113, to restore the ability of the police to pursue criminals. A bill passed in 2021, HB 1054, banned most police pursuits and predictably led to a massive spike in crime. One fleeing criminal called 911 to complain that the police were following him. “It’s a violation of 1054 – he’s not allowed to chase me,” the lawbreaker complained.
In another example, Seattle police watched helplessly as burglars pulled out of the parking lot of a small business they had just robbed and drove away.
Passage of Initiative 2113 restores the ability of police to gather information and conduct normal criminal investigations. It allows police to do their jobs, by pursuing and arresting suspects based on reasonable evidence. The result will be the promotion of justice and safer streets for everyone.
All three measures will become law in 90 days; they don’t require the governor’s signature.
On a discouraging note, legislative leaders refused to take up three other citizen-led initiatives. These are proposals to repeal the hidden gas tax (I-2117), to repeal the capital gains income tax (I-2109), and to allow workers to opt-out of the long-term care payroll tax (I-2124). Instead, the outcome of these ballot measures will be decided by voters in the November election.
The central principle of democracy is respecting the will of the people, especially in support of bipartisan ideas that work and enjoy broad popular backing. That is why swift passage of these three citizen initiatives is so encouraging. Let’s hope that on other policy issues elected officials respond just as positively to the will of the people they represent.
Paul Guppy is the vice president for research at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Letter: ‘Immigration’ resolution scheduled for this Wednesday at Clark County Council MeetingRob Anderson urges residents to closely watch an upcoming Clark County Council meeting where an immigration-related resolution and proposed rule changes are expected to be discussed.
- Opinion: The 1700-square-foot solution to Washington’s housing crisisAn opinion column arguing that Washington’s energy code has driven up housing costs and outlining how HB 2486 aims to limit those impacts for smaller, more affordable homes.
- Rep. John Ley’s new bill calls for an independent audit of Interstate 5 Bridge Replacement ProjectRep. John Ley introduced legislation requiring an independent audit of the Interstate 5 Bridge Replacement Project to review costs, management, and oversight.
- Letter: Public school visionClark County resident Larry Roe urges a deeper community discussion about public school priorities, levy funding, and the long-term affordability of education for local families.
- County Charter Review Commission sets meeting schedule, selects officersThe Clark County Charter Review Commission set a weekly meeting schedule beginning Feb. 4 and selected officers as it begins its review of the county charter.
- WA Secretary of State certifies parental rights initiativeThe Washington Secretary of State certified a parental rights initiative after verifying enough valid signatures, sending the measure to the Legislature and likely placing it on the November 2026 ballot.
- WA leaders prepare for possibility of immigration crackdownWashington’s governor and attorney general outlined preparations for a potential immigration crackdown, including possible conflicts between federal agents and state or local authorities








