Northwest just finished warmest fall on record, scientists report

The Boston Glacier, left, viewed from Forbidden Peak, falls away from Boston Peak in the North Cascades. Boston Basin to the right. Photo courtesy Bill Lucia/Washington State Standard
The Boston Glacier, left, viewed from Forbidden Peak, falls away from Boston Peak in the North Cascades. Boston Basin to the right. Photo courtesy Bill Lucia/Washington State Standard

Snowpack in the Northwest is sitting at the lowest level for the region as a whole at this point in the winter since record keeping began in 2001

Alex Baumhardt
Washington State Standard

Across the Northwest, a record warm fall and lack of snowpack going into the winter is putting more drought pressure on Oregon, Idaho, Washington and western Montana.

Despite record rain in western Washington recently, and earlier this year in central and southern Oregon, the showers are filling up already overdrawn reservoirs in many areas, scientists said on Monday at an online drought and climate outlook meeting hosted by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Snowpack in the region and in the Cascade Range, acting as a reservoir of its own for summer months when there’s little rain and many communities rely on snowmelt, is simply not piling up.

Snowpack in the Northwest is sitting at the lowest level for the region as a whole at this point in the winter since record keeping began in 2001, according to Jacob Genuise, a climatologist at the Washington State Climate Office.

“We’re seeing just really warm storms with a lot of rain and not a lot of snow,” Genuise said. “Given all this warm rain, it actually melted some of our snowpack, and we saw a decline.”

The Northwest just experienced its sixth warmest August on record, the warmest September on record — about 6 degrees Fahrenheit above normal on average — and the second warmest November on record, according to NOAA data.

Taken together, August through November of this year was the record warmest on average across the Northwest in more than 130 years of record keeping. NASA scientists, using NOAA records of global average temperatures dating back to 1880, found that this November was the third-warmest November on Earth, behind only November of 2023 and 2024.

But in 2023 and 2024, a planet-warming El Niño weather pattern helped fuel record temperatures, according to the data. There was no El Niño event to drive temperatures this year.

Temperatures in the Northwest have been most abnormal across all of Idaho, eastern Washington and eastern Oregon, and in western Montana.

“It’s definitely not good,” Genuise said. “We’ve seen much more above normal years in the past few decades than we did in the past.”

Rain not snow

By the end of this summer, drought took hold of the Northwest, Genuise said, especially in parts of northern Idaho and southeast Washington. Snow melted too quickly in spring, creating drought as the summer went on, and abnormal heat also increased surface water evaporation in lakes and streams, lowering water levels that contributed to drought in parts of the region.

In the last month, most of western Oregon was at 50% of its normal level of precipitation for this time of year, according to Brad Pugh, a meteorologist at the National Weather Service’s Climate Prediction Center.

Only southern and central Oregon have been spared major drought impacts this year, but reservoirs that filled from heavy spring rains are also being quickly depleted, he said.

Everywhere north of Oregon is experiencing above average rainfall, Pugh said.

This will potentially help pull the Northwest out of a region-wide drought in the coming weeks or month, according to Pugh, but much of that will also depend on whether or not it gets cold enough for rain to turn into snow and snowpack.

The only area in the region getting roughly normal snowpack is western Montana, where temperatures have been just-cold-enough to turn rain to snow. All of Oregon and most of southern Washington are seeing “really, really deep snowpack deficits,” Genuise said.

If the snowpack is still bad in the spring, there could be ongoing drought issues in the year ahead, Genuise added.

“We could see this change, and this is likely to change as we see some wetter and cooler systems later in the month, but we’re definitely sitting well below normal as we talk here today,” he said.

This story was originally produced by Oregon Capital Chronicle, which is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network which includes Washington State Standard, and is supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity.


Also read:

1 Comment

  1. jim karlock

    1–Alex Baumhardt, Is there any evidence that this is caused by man’s CO2?
    2– We should keep i mind that the climate alarm grifters are now paying for news articles.
    AP will hire about 20 journalists based in Africa, Brazil, India and the U.S. to supplement the news agency’s journalists already covering climate and the environment. Together the team will transform how AP covers the climate story, including focusing on the profound and varied impacts of climate change on society in areas such as food, agriculture, migration, housing and urban planning, disaster response, the economy and culture.
    Read the rest at: https://www.ap.org/press-releases/2022/ap-announces-sweeping-climate-journalism-initiative

    More at: http://www.debunkingclimate.com/paid_news.html

    https://www.axios.com/2024/06/11/partisan-news-websites-dark-money 

    “Over the last 20 years the tax-efficient billionaire foundations have stepped into the funding gaps left by declining circulation and advertising sales across mainstream media. It is noted by the EJN that journalists “overwhelmingly agreed” that support from external funding organisations was “essential” to enabling their climate and environmental reporting. Any journalist can apply to be a member of the EJN and the “primary benefit” is said to be access to grant funding for stories and “training opportunities”. The operation claims over 25,000 members in 200 countries.”
    https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/06/12/new-report-reveals-massive-scale-of-green-billionaire-funding-of-climate-emergency-reporting-in-mainstream-media/

    3–There is much evidence of warming NOT BEING CAUSED BY MAN:

    1-There is NOTHING UNUSUAL about our climate – The Holocene (Our current inter-glacial) has been both warmer and cooler than now BEFORE man emitted CO2  See:
    http://www.sustainableoregon.com/ipcc_says.html
    An Estimate of The Centennial Variability of Global Temperatures, Philip J. Lloyd,  DOI: 10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417, http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/abs/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417
    http://www.debunkingclimate.com/natural_climate.html

    2-Global warming started 200 years BEFORE man started releasing CO2
    See: https://www.ssb.no/en/natur-og-miljo/forurensning-og-klima/artikler/to-what-extent-are-temperature-levels-changing-due-to-greenhouse-gas-emissions/_/attachment/inline/5a3f4a9b-3bc3-4988-9579-9fea82944264:f63064594b9225f9d7dc458b0b70a646baec3339/DP1007.pdf

    3- CO2 changes FOLLOW, NOT LEAD, temperature changes in the ice core data AND at all other times. See:
    https://judithcurry.com/2023/09/26/causality-and-climate/

    4- NO ONE HAS EVER shown good evidence that man’s CO2 is causing serious global warming. (prove this wrong by posting actual evidence that man’s CO2 is causing serious global warming.)

    5- Solar cycles are a better fit to climate than CO2, thus negating the claim that the simultaneous rise of temperature and CO2 proves CO2 is causing increased temperature. See: http://www.sustainableoregon.com/CO2_Solar_Corrlations.html

    6- Recent warming is at the same rate as the late 1800s but now with much more of man’s CO2. (More of a cause should cause more effect.)
    http://www.debunkingclimate.com/co2_rate_of_warming.html http://www.debunkingclimate.com/no-rapid-warming.html#no-rapid-warming

    7- Most climate records start at the end of the coldest time in 8,000 years, so natural warming is the best explanation for our current warming: “The Little Ice Age (LIA), which lasted from about 1250 to 1860 AD, was likely the coldest period of the last 8000 years.” from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277379122001627
     
    8-We have never had accurate whole earth coverage of temperature until satellites in 1979, so it is not possible to make any claims about today’s climate being unusual compared to meaningful history. http://www.debunkingclimate.com/lack_of_data.html

    9- Human CO2 release warms the climate less than 0.03◦C  
     https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.01245.pdf

    10- Melting glaciers are uncovering artifacts from Roman and Medieval times, proving that those areas were ice free during those times and thus were warmer than now, which in turn, proves that our climate is not unprecedented which proves that man’s CO2 is not having a major (if any) effect on climate. See:
    http://www.debunkingclimate.com/glaciers.html
    https://notrickszone.com/2019/08/26/a-1000-year-old-forest-buried-under-alaskas-mendenhall-glacier-uncovers-a-warm-medieval-period/
    https://climateaudit.org/2005/11/18/archaeological-finds-in-retreating-swiss-glacier/

    See DebunkingClimate.com for real evidence.
    Feel free to disagree by showing actual evidence that man’s CO2 is causing serious global warming. (Or show your unwillingness to learn by posting a laughter emoji.)
    Please note:
    1-Evidence of warming, unusual weather, storms, floods IS NOT evidence that man’s CO2 is the cause. 
    2-Correlation is not causation http://www.debunkingclimate.com/CO2_Solar_Corrlations.html
    3-An expert’s assertion, government’s assertion, consensus of experts, polls or majority belief are not evidence. They are hearsay.
    4-Climate models are not evidence. 
    5-Warmest weather in 100 years means it was warmer 100 years ago when CO2 was lower.
    6-If an event is NOT unprecedented, then you have to explain why whatever caused the earlier events is NOT the cause of the latest occurrence of that event. 

    Evidence is actual data PRO AND CON with reasoned analysis and logical conclusions while FULLY CONSIDERING OPPOSING evidence.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *