
The sixth vote, the third on Thursday, ended similarly to nearly every other vote this week
Casey Harper
The Center Square
U.S. Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., failed for a sixth time Wednesday afternoon to secure the needed 218 votes to become the next Speaker of the House. After the vote, the House adjourned and is expected to return later tonight.
The sixth vote, the third on Thursday, ended similarly to nearly every other vote this week: about 20 Republicans voted for a Republican challenger to McCarthy, who can only afford to lose the support of four House Republicans.
But five Republicans have made clear they do not support McCarthy, and voting Tuesday and Wednesday showed that many more were willing to vote against him, even if it means drawing out the process for multiple days with no end in sight.
U.S. Rep. Byron Donalds, R-Fla., received 20 votes in the sixth vote Tuesday.
“It’s time to find a Speaker that will unify the GOP,” said U.S. Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., who voted for Donalds.
McCarthy’s support has slightly decreased from 203 votes in the first ballot to 201 in the most recent.
The multiple votes for a speaker is not unprecedented in American history, but it has not happened in 100 years. The longest battle for the position took about two months and 133 voting rounds.
Until the chamber elects a speaker, it will be largely inactive. The Senate easily selected Sens. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., to lead their respective parties in that chamber.
Former President Donald Trump vocalized his support behind McCarthy in a post on TruthSocial Wednesday, but it was not enough to sway Republican holdouts.
Some conservative Republicans have been unwilling to throw their support behind the California Republican, who many see as too liberal, but so far no challenger has arisen with enough clout to get the needed votes.
“In his 14 years in Republican leadership, McCarthy has repeatedly failed to demonstrate any desire to meaningfully change the status quo in Washington,” U.S. Rep. Scott Perry, R-Penn., said. “Despite our deep reservations we have continued to work in earnest to find a path forward with McCarthy, knowing that this crucial moment would come.
As The Center Square previously reported, Perry said he and other conservative members in the House laid out conditions for McCarthy but that he “balked” when faced with them. Those conditions included a promise to vote on a balanced budget, the “Texas Border Plan,” term limits for members of Congress, and the Fair Tax Act, which would create a national sales tax on certain services and property to replace the current income tax, payroll taxes, and estate and gift taxes.
“We requested transparent, accountable votes on individual earmarks that would require two-thirds support to pass, and to ensure that all amendments to cut spending would be allowed floor consideration,” Perry said. “He dismissed it.”
This report was first published by The Center Square.
Also read:
- Vancouver Police investigate fatality collisionVancouver Police are investigating a vehicle versus pedestrian collision on NE 162nd Avenue near NE Poplar Street that resulted in a fatality.
- Washington governor talks potential return of SuperSonics with NBA commissionerGov. Bob Ferguson spoke with NBA Commissioner Adam Silver about the possibility of bringing the Seattle SuperSonics back as the league weighs future expansion decisions.
- Opinion: The income tax proposal has arrivedRyan Frost of the Washington Policy Center argues that a proposed Washington income tax creates a new revenue stream rather than delivering tax reform or relief.
- Is it time to lower the legal limit for blood alcohol content to 0.05 in the state of Washington?Mothers Against Drunk Driving and families affected by impaired driving are urging Washington lawmakers to lower the legal BAC limit to 0.05, citing prevention data and personal testimony from Clark County residents.
- Expert in homebuilding has several tips on how to make housing affordableVeteran homebuilder Tracy Doriot shares his perspective on why regulations, taxes, labor shortages, and permitting delays are driving housing costs higher in Clark County and across Washington.
- Opinion: ‘If they want light rail, they should be the ones who pay for it’Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance argues that supporters of light rail tied to the I-5 Bridge replacement should bear the local cost of operating and maintaining the system through a narrowly drawn sub-district.
- POLL: If a sub-district is created, what area should it include?Clark County residents are asked where a potential C-TRAN sub-district should be drawn if voters are asked to fund light rail operations and maintenance costs.








