Legislators from the 49th District outline agenda for session

The three lawmakers will have a strong majority and positions of power in the 105-day session

VANCOUVER — As has become their habit, the members of Southwest Washington’s 49th Legislative District gathered ahead of the legislature’s long session for a town hall meeting with constituents. The group also regularly holds post-session town hall meetings, and said they would attempt to at least hold telephone town halls during the 105-day session.

Members of Southwest Washington’s 49th Legislative District address a town hall meeting ahead of the state’s legislative session. Photo by Chris Brown
Members of Southwest Washington’s 49th Legislative District address a town hall meeting ahead of the state’s legislative session. Photo by Chris Brown

Several hundred people crowded into the ESD 112 building on a recent Saturday morning to submit their questions in writing for the 49th District representatives, who went through several dozen during the two hour session. The education funding crisis, transportation, and healthcare factored heavily into the discussion.


(NOTE: You can read ClarkCountyToday.com’s pre-legislative session coverage of the 18th and 17th districts here, and here)


While Republicans currently fill all seats in the 17th and 18th Districts, the 49th is represented by Democrats. Representatives Sharon Wylie and Monica Stonier are entering their fourth and second terms respectively. Stonier previously represented the 17th District for one term before being unseated by Lynda Wilson in 2014. Neither faced any opponent in the 2018 primary or general elections.


Sen. Annette Cleveland is in the midst of her second term, and will be chair of the senate Healthcare Committee. She also serves on the Transportation Committee, and the Rules Committee. This year she will also serve on the Human Services Committee.

Sen. Annette Cleveland talks to constituents at a town hall meeting of 49th District lawmakers. Photo by Chris Brown
Sen. Annette Cleveland talks to constituents at a town hall meeting of 49th District lawmakers. Photo by Chris Brown

Though she’s just in her second term for the 49th District, Stonier is moving quickly up the ranks in the House. This year she will be Majority Floor Leader, though she says she had to give up her vice chair position of the House Education Committee in order to take on that leadership role. Stonier, who works as an instructional coach for paraeducators in the Evergreen School District, played a key role in creating the McCleary funding fix during the past two legislative sessions.


Wylie will be vice chair of the House Transportation Committee, along with serving on the bi-state Transportation Committee formed to work with Oregon on restarting the I-5 Bridge replacement conversation. Stonier is also on that committee, which is chaired by Cleveland. Wylie will also serve on the House Finance Committee, along with the Committee on Innovation, Technology, and Economic Development.

Rep. Sharon Wylie, of the 49th District, talks to constituents at a town hall meeting. Photo by Chris Brown
Rep. Sharon Wylie, of the 49th District, talks to constituents at a town hall meeting. Photo by Chris Brown


Education funding


Although we’ve already gone into some depth on what local lawmakers have to say about the school budget issue here, the 49th District legislators also addressed some of the changes they would like to see in the way the state funds basic education.


Stonier said she voted for the final McCleary bill, but was not in favor of the move to eliminate the statewide salary schedule.


“If we had maintained a state salary schedule, I think that would have helped even out some of these challenges that we’re seeing now,” Stonier told the crowd. She also said the way cost of living was calculated in Southwest Washington didn’t take the Portland area into account, something she would like to see addressed.

Rep. Monica Stonier (49th District) talks with constituents at a recent town hall meeting. Photo by Chris Brown
Rep. Monica Stonier (49th District) talks with constituents at a recent town hall meeting. Photo by Chris Brown

Cleveland said there is likely to be plenty of discussion in Olympia this session about education funding, but there’s a shortage of good information just yet about what the real problems are, and how to fix them.


“We’re all listening,” she said, “we’re anxious for some good data to come back to help better demonstrate to us what some of those impacts are.”


At least one question was asked at the town hall about what the state might to do address the impact of property tax increases to fully fund basic education. All three said they’re eager to talk more about ways to reform the state’s tax system to address revenue issues without pricing people out of their homes.


“We’re trying to shift that burden so it’s more fair in this state,” said Stonier. “And all of our options, I think, in the House this year that are going to be considered will push on that.”


Interstate 5 Bridge


Sen. Cleveland said in her opening statement that getting funding for a new Interstate 5 Bridge project would be among her top priorities for the session. It is expected that a major transportation funding package will be among the major items to come out of this session. Among local projects looking for funding is a widening of SR-14 to Camas, and the Interstate Bridge.

A crowd packs the ESD 112 building’s conference room to hear from their 49th District representatives. Photo by Chris Brown
A crowd packs the ESD 112 building’s conference room to hear from their 49th District representatives. Photo by Chris Brown

As for whether they would join the call by both Washington Gov. Jay Inslee and Oregon Gov. Kate Brown for light rail on any new I-5 Bridge, all three said that’s not really something they’re considering right now. Cleveland said her major focus is taking advantage of state funding to re-open an office to examine how much of the ill-fated Columbia River Crossing (CRC) project can be salvaged before moving ahead with new research.


“We can actually have staff dedicated to, again, working on this effort, and it’s not just us legislators,” says Cleveland. “We can’t answer some of these detailed questions. That’s what we need a project office for.”


As for light rail, supporters have pushed for it, in part, because they believe it will help to secure more Federal funding. Cleveland said that may not be the case this time around.


“Currently, with the Trump administration, light rail is not being made a funding priority in the way that it has been in the past,” she said, while noting that inclusion of light rail in the CRC’s preferred local alternative meant each state only needed to provide $450 million, with the Feds chipping in $850 million.


“We’re not going to get a deal like that again folks,” she said. “With, unfortunately, that project failing and not moving forward, we’re having to start over from scratch in terms of a financial funding plan.”


Healthcare public option


One of the key talking points out of Gov. Jay Inslee’s budget was a public healthcare option. While all three 49th District lawmakers said they support the idea, and eventually would like to see single payer healthcare in Washington state, there are many questions to be asked about how to fund it sustainably.


As chair of the Senate Healthcare Committee last session, Cleveland said she “scheduled all three single-payer bills that had been put forward for a hearing,” but admitted that doing so may have actually been counterproductive to getting anything done. “My intent in hearing those bills was to send a strong message to those all around the state that this is a priority for the state of Washington,” she said. “This is a vision for the future.”


But the legislators also admitted that it could be an expensive future, requiring plenty of thought about how to pay for it. Vermont recently passed single payer healthcare legislation, but then had to shelve it after discovering it would have put the state in serious financial trouble.


“They passed their bill without any sense of what the cost would be,” said Cleveland, noting that it would have required an 11.5 percent increase in payroll taxes, and 9 percent increase in income taxes.


“There isn’t agreement, even among the people who support single payer as to what single payer needs to look like, ultimately,” Cleveland admitted. “So it’s my intent that we continue this discussion and we continue making progress forward.”


Stonier agreed, noting that the governor’s public option proposal could mark a good starting place toward that ultimate goal, adding that her primary goal this session is to address medicare reimbursements to increase access to medical care.


“Whether or not we are able to move that legislation, I think that we’ll continue to look for places where we can increase access,” she said.


Climate change


The failure of I-1631 in November sent a clear message that Washington voters aren’t quite ready to see their gas prices and home energy costs jump in order to address climate change in the state. The proposed carbon tax was even criticized by many Democrats as being too hard on average citizens, while giving a pass to some of the state’s biggest polluters. But Gov. Inslee has proposed other items in his budget aimed at addressing the issue.


“As a state we are not anywhere near on target to meeting any of our environmental health challenges,” Cleveland said, “and so we absolutely have to put time, focus, and attention to how it is we’re going to get back on track.”


Stonier agreed, but said she felt a 100 percent clean energy bill introduced at the end of the 2018 legislative session is a better way to address climate change without threatening jobs in the state.


“It was an effort to achieve some of the same goals you saw in an initiative this time around,” she said, “but there was broader agreement in what we were doing in the legislature with labor.”


All three 49th District legislators said they agree with the governor’s goals, and are interested in having the conversation about how to get there.


“I believe that we will come up compromises, because it’s very clear that there’s growing momentum for taking stronger action,” said Wylie, adding that “the governor’s budget in our state is a starting point, and a lot of people have opinions. What I’m hearing is a lot of will to come up with something this year.”


Political division in the Legislature

One question from a self-described “independent, moderate” voter centered around the current political climate, and extremes on both sides of the political aisle. The 49th District legislators all said they believe much of that stems from the way the media covers political stories.


“We don’t have the privilege of seeing all of the good work that the legislature does when the media covers the conflict,” said Stonier, noting that many of her bills are cosponsored by a Republican, often 17th District Representative Paul Harris, who defeated her in 2010. “Most of the bills we pass, pass with overwhelming bipartisan majorities. That doesn’t usually get very much press, because who wants to cover what everybody agrees on?”


“When the campaign is over, the job in the legislature is to learn that the three soundbites that were on your campaign literature weren’t about collaborative governing,” added Wylie. “We pass a whole lot of bills to fix unintended consequences, and we pass a whole lot of bills in a bipartisan way, and we solve a whole lot of problems that we start out disagreeing with, and then come together.”


That topic was also part of a question about the legislator’s personal perspective on how they reach decisions, and whether it was ever acceptable to reject the will of the majority in deciding how to vote on a bill.


“I’m not someone who puts their finger in the air and just listens to the loudest voice,” said Wylie, while adding that she takes input from both sides into account, along with her own personal beliefs, before making a decision.


“I think sometimes folks feel ignored if they don’t see their values represented in votes that are cast,” added Stonier. “But I would say all of us make a commitment to listen to all sides before making those decisions. But there’s a weight of many considerations.”


“I don’t believe that pitchforks politics are effective,” agreed Cleveland. “I work hard to maintain my career outside of the legislature so that I continue to be free to answer ‘what’s the right thing to do?’, and cast my vote based on that answer.”




The trio was also asked for their thoughts on redistricting that favors keeping one party in power over another, also known as gerrymandering.


“We have, probably, one of the least awful redistricting systems in the country,” responded Wylie.


In Washington state redistricting is done by a mixed board of one Republican, one Democrat, and one Independent.


“My personal opinion is that I would like it if all districts, including my own, were more competitive,” said Wylie, who faced no opposition last year in the heavily left-leaning 49th. “When we’re trying to do the right thing and we’re not being as blatantly partisan as some of the other states are, we still tend to protect incumbency, and I thing that tends to have a chilling effect on democracy.”


Other goals


As for what they plan to work on personally in the new session, Stonier said she’ll be focused on moving through legislation on portable benefits. It would make Washington state the first in the nation to make benefits follow the employee from one workplace to another, rather than the other way around.


Stonier is also prime sponsoring a bill to allow school districts to get a building bond approved with a simple majority vote, rather than the currently required 60 percent, plus one vote. That would especially help districts like Battle Ground, which have repeatedly received majority support for building bonds, but fallen short of the threshold currently required.


Wylie said she’ll be pushing for legislation that would allow people wanting to age in place to deduct certain medical expenses from their taxes. For instance, if someone needed to install a wheelchair ramp in order to remain in their home, the cost would be deductible. She also said she wants to take a close look at current state sales tax exemptions, to see if more equity can be implemented in the system.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x