Issued ‘no-contact’ orders because others complained about her views
A college in Illinois has agreed that it will pay up to a conservative student for its officials’ actions to silence her.
A report from Fox News reveals Southern Illinois University Edwardsville will pay $80,000, and will require three professors there to take mandatory training related to free speech.
The ADF represented student Maggie Dejong in the dispute.
“The settlement also stipulates that SIUE officials must revise their student handbook and policies to ‘ensure students with varying political, religious and ideological views are welcome in the art therapy program,'” Fox reported.
Dejong had been slammed by the school with three “no-contact orders” that prevented her from having direct or indirect communication with three specific students last year. Those students had complained to the school about her, alleging her political views actually constituted “harassment” against them.
Fox reported, “Dejong previously told ‘Fox & Friends First’ that she routinely participated in class discussions on contentious topics such as race relations, religion, COVID-19 and censorship, typically offering a conservative perspective.”
She also posted on social media comments on abortion and defunding the police.
Tyson Langhoffer, a lawyer for ADF, explained her classmates were out of sorts because Dejong’s postings include a defense of Kyle Rittenhouse. She also denounced the racist critical race theory.
The ADF said the university refused to allow her to defend her beliefs, instead asking other students to report her for “harmful rhetoric.”
“University officials have since agreed to revise their policies to ensure students have ‘substantive and procedural protections’ from no-contact orders,” Fox reported.
Now the school has issued a statement that it supports the First Amendment.
ADF Legal Counsel Mathew Hoffmann said, “Public universities can’t punish students for expressing their political and religious viewpoints. Maggie, like every other student, is protected under the First Amendment to respectfully share her personal beliefs, and university officials were wrong to issue gag orders and silence her speech.”
Also read:
- VIDEO: Vote-by-mail rules in WA at risk in SCOTUS election law case
More than 127,000 Washington ballots postmarked by Election Day but received after could be disqualified under a possible Supreme Court ruling, prompting debate from both parties. - Rounding out debate, Gov. Ferguson signs bill addressing retailers’ penny problem
A new Washington law lets merchants round cash purchases to the nearest 5 cents, aiming to manage change as shortages of pennies affect both businesses and customers. - Opinion: State is rightly emphasizing experience and skills, not degrees
Elizabeth New explains how a new state policy removes unnecessary advanced degree requirements, supporting skills-based employment and broadening opportunities for capable workers. - Opinion: The wealth migration is real – which states are benefiting?
IRS data shows Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming attracted significant wealth from new residents, while Washington state saw a loss of $500 million as its new capital gains tax took effect. - Expect delays on SR 14 in Vancouver for guardrail repairs Wednesday
State Route 14 travelers in Vancouver should plan for morning delays as WSDOT will close two eastbound lanes for guardrail repairs, affecting mileposts 6.0 to 7.0. - Clark County Fire District 10 responds to fatal structure fire on NE Fargher Drive
Emergency crews from multiple agencies responded to a structure fire on NE Fargher Drive in Amboy, where two victims lost their lives despite rescue and medical efforts. - Opinion: Voting with the Democrat Party – Back to the future!
Lars Larson connects the history of election rules to today’s debates, highlighting Supreme Court concerns over counting ballots after Election Day.
