
The building code council is doing so in light of a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in May that found federal law preempts state and local restrictions on the use of natural gas
Brett Davis
The Center Square Washington
Next month in Spokane Valley, the Washington State Building Code Council will consider modifying codes it adopted earlier this year requiring the use of electric heat pumps rather than natural gas in all new construction.
The building code council is doing so in light of a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in May – California Restaurant Association v. City of Berkeley – that found federal law preempts state and local restrictions on the use of natural gas.
As a result of that ruling, the council delayed implementation of code changes until Oct. 29. The new rules had been set to take effect on July 1.
Proponents of the new codes claim they are a cost-effective step in reducing carbon emissions across the state that will result in burning less fossil fuels as part of the fight against climate change.
Opponents remain unconvinced, saying the new codes will increase the cost of constructing new homes and buildings and that those price hikes will be passed along to buyers.
“The code proposals before the council continue to make it too cost-prohibitive for homeowners and businesses to have the natural gas appliances many prefer and need,” Building Industry Association of Washington Executive Vice President Greg Lane said in a Wednesday news release.
Energy codes need to be loosened in a state dealing with a major housing shortage, he said.
“Washington already has one of the most stringent energy codes in the nation and a massive unmet need for affordable homes,” he concluded. “The SBCC should reject any and all proposals that limit flexibility and choice.”
The upcoming hearing on energy codes is scheduled to take place from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m., on Friday, Sept. 15, at the Center Place Regional Event Center, Room 109, located at 2426 North Discovery Place in Spokane Valley. For information on attending the meeting virtually, click here.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Letter: Interstate Bridge Replacement $13.6 billion estimate is too low! Bob Ortblad argues the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s $13.6 billion cost estimate understates the true expense, citing comparable projects, construction challenges, and engineering assumptions.
- Opinion: ‘The drama and the waste of taxpayer money continues’Rep. John Ley outlines his objections to the approved fixed-span I-5 Bridge design, citing cost concerns, engineering standards, funding uncertainty, and opposition to light rail and tolls.
- Coast Guard approves fixed-span design for new Interstate BridgeThe U.S. Coast Guard has approved a fixed-span design for the new Interstate Bridge, clearing a major hurdle for the Interstate Bridge Replacement project.
- Business Profile: Handel’s Ice Cream opens its first shop in Washington, in VancouverHandel’s Ice Cream has opened its first Washington location in east Vancouver, with a grand opening planned for Jan. 17.
- Opinion: Why vote no on the Battle Ground School District levy?Dick Rylander outlines why he believes voters should reject the Battle Ground School District levy, citing costs, enrollment trends, test results, and district spending priorities.
- Letter: The multi-million dollar cash grab in Washington schoolsYacolt resident Mark Rose argues that rising superintendent salaries conflict with classroom cuts and repeated levy requests in Clark County school districts.
- Discover your future at WSU Vancouver’s Preview Day, Jan. 24WSU Vancouver will host a free Preview Day on Jan. 24, offering prospective students and families an inside look at campus life and academic opportunities.








