Debate over proposed Rules of Procedure changes raises questions about independence, accountability, and representation on regional boards
The Clark County Council is considering new language in its Rules of Procedure that would require councilors serving on boards and commissions to vote in line with the council’s official position. The discussion follows last year’s removal of Councilor Michelle Belkot from the C-TRAN board after she said she would vote independently on light rail-related costs. Supporters of the proposed changes say they would clarify authority and ensure a unified voice, while critics argue they would undermine independent judgment and voter representation. This poll asks readers where they stand on that question.
More info:
County Council still looking to change language in Rules of Procedure
Clark County Council members continued debating proposed changes to the Rules of Procedure tied to last year’s removal of Michelle Belkot from the C-TRAN board, including...
Read more
Also read:
- Opinion: Inviting courts into health care policy discussion
Elizabeth New (Hovde) warns that Senate Joint Resolution 8206 could invite lawsuits by placing vague health care mandates into Washington’s Constitution. - Opinion: 24 States In. Washington Out? $732 Million Lost?
Vicki Murray argues Washington risks forfeiting $732 million in federal education funding if state leaders do not opt into the federal tax-credit scholarship program. - Opinion: Nationwide strike in support of illegals and opposing the rule of law?
Lars Larson argues that a reported nationwide strike reflects opposition to immigration enforcement and the rule of law, criticizing political leaders and media coverage. - POLL: Should councilors serving on boards be required to vote the way the full council decides?
A new poll asks whether Clark County councilors serving on boards should be required to vote in line with the full council’s position or retain independent judgment. - Opinion: Olympia wants a 4-day work week. It won’t work out as the politicians think it will
Mark Harmsworth argues that House Bill 2611’s proposed 32-hour workweek would raise costs, strain small businesses, and undermine Washington’s economic competitiveness.
No, they should be required to vote the will of the people. Article 1 of the WA State Constitution says: “All political power is inherent in the people, and governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, and are established to protect and maintain individual rights.” That means, if they know the will of the people then they are bound to vote accordingly. That is what Michelle did. And she was absolutely in the right to do so. The OTHER Councillors were in the wrong to insist that she vote the way THEY wanted her to vote, instead of the people. As a fact, EVERY Council District voted to require a vote of the people before spending money on Light Rail. The other Councillors are in VIOTATION OF THEIR OATH OF OFFICE TO UPHOLD THE WA STATE CONSTITUTION!