<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>drilled shafts &#8211; ClarkCountyToday.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/tag/drilled-shafts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com</link>
	<description>Your News Source with Integrity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 18:42:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
<span class="ai-content"></span>
	<item>
		<title>Letter: Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s safety?</title>
		<link>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/opinion/letter-interstate-bridge-replacement-programs-safety/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=letter-interstate-bridge-replacement-programs-safety</link>
					<comments>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/opinion/letter-interstate-bridge-replacement-programs-safety/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ClarkCountyToday.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 18:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Letters To The Editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Northwest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeway noise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington State Department of Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state safety engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon Department of Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge demolition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upton Sinclair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SR-14]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S-curve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[letters to the editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black ice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Ortblad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semi-truck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elevated approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immersed tunnel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver bridge approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSDOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crosswind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off-ramp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilled shafts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloverleaf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interstate Bridge Replacement program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earthquake resilience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temporary piles]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/uncategorized/letter-interstate-bridge-replacement-programs-safety/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="300" height="169" src="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Large_Clark-County-Today-16540-bob-ortblad-interstate-bridge-replacement-safety-ibr-vancouver-300x169.jpg" class="attachment-medium size-medium wp-post-image" alt="Bob Ortblad argues IBR&#039;s elevated S-curve approach will ice over far more often than the existing ground-level bridge." decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Large_Clark-County-Today-16540-bob-ortblad-interstate-bridge-replacement-safety-ibr-vancouver-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Large_Clark-County-Today-16540-bob-ortblad-interstate-bridge-replacement-safety-ibr-vancouver-711x400.jpg 711w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Large_Clark-County-Today-16540-bob-ortblad-interstate-bridge-replacement-safety-ibr-vancouver-150x84.jpg 150w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Large_Clark-County-Today-16540-bob-ortblad-interstate-bridge-replacement-safety-ibr-vancouver-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Large_Clark-County-Today-16540-bob-ortblad-interstate-bridge-replacement-safety-ibr-vancouver.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>Bob Ortblad argues IBR's elevated S-curve approach will ice over far more often than the existing ground-level bridge.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/opinion/letter-interstate-bridge-replacement-programs-safety/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://abacusai-apps-ccd5ce37d653fd7df559be4d-us-west-2.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/36040/public/uploads/e5eb59-16540-podcast.mp3" length="3063840" type="audio/mpeg" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letter: Interstate Bridge Replacement $13.6 billion estimate is too low! </title>
		<link>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/opinion/letter-interstate-bridge-replacement-13-6-billion-estimate-is-too-low/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=letter-interstate-bridge-replacement-13-6-billion-estimate-is-too-low</link>
					<comments>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/opinion/letter-interstate-bridge-replacement-13-6-billion-estimate-is-too-low/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ClarkCountyToday.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 19:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Letters To The Editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia River Crossing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Letter to the editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SR 520 Portage Bay Bridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interstate Bridge Replacement program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[$13.6 billion estimate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skanska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Ortblad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-5 Bridge replacement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilled shafts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge construction costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxpayer costs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/?p=180724</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="300" height="169" src="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Large_Clark-County-Today-Letter-Interstate-Bridge-Replacement-13.6-billion-estimate-is-too-low-300x169.jpg" class="attachment-medium size-medium wp-post-image" alt="Bob Ortblad argues the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s $13.6 billion cost estimate understates the true expense, citing comparable projects, construction challenges, and engineering assumptions." decoding="async" srcset="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Large_Clark-County-Today-Letter-Interstate-Bridge-Replacement-13.6-billion-estimate-is-too-low-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Large_Clark-County-Today-Letter-Interstate-Bridge-Replacement-13.6-billion-estimate-is-too-low-711x400.jpg 711w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Large_Clark-County-Today-Letter-Interstate-Bridge-Replacement-13.6-billion-estimate-is-too-low-150x84.jpg 150w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Large_Clark-County-Today-Letter-Interstate-Bridge-Replacement-13.6-billion-estimate-is-too-low-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Large_Clark-County-Today-Letter-Interstate-Bridge-Replacement-13.6-billion-estimate-is-too-low.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>Bob Ortblad argues the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s $13.6 billion cost estimate understates the true expense, citing comparable projects, construction challenges, and engineering assumptions.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/opinion/letter-interstate-bridge-replacement-13-6-billion-estimate-is-too-low/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letter: Has $450 million been wasted on a bridge that&#8217;s too low for the Coast Guard with a foundation too costly to build?</title>
		<link>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/opinion/letter-has-450-million-been-wasted-on-a-bridge-thats-too-low-for-the-coast-guard-with-a-foundation-too-costly-to-build/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=letter-has-450-million-been-wasted-on-a-bridge-thats-too-low-for-the-coast-guard-with-a-foundation-too-costly-to-build</link>
					<comments>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/opinion/letter-has-450-million-been-wasted-on-a-bridge-thats-too-low-for-the-coast-guard-with-a-foundation-too-costly-to-build/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ClarkCountyToday.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 00:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Letters To The Editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coast Guard clearance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilled shafts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geotechnical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia River Crossing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Letter to the editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge foundation costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interstate Bridge Replacement program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SR 520 Portage Bay Bridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abernethy Bridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immersed tube tunnel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBR]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/?p=180206</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="300" height="169" src="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Large_Clark-County-Today-15358-interstate-bridge-replacement-bob-ortblad-300x169.jpg" class="attachment-medium size-medium wp-post-image" alt="A Seattle engineer questions whether hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent on a bridge design he argues is unnecessarily risky and costly compared to an immersed tunnel alternative." decoding="async" srcset="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Large_Clark-County-Today-15358-interstate-bridge-replacement-bob-ortblad-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Large_Clark-County-Today-15358-interstate-bridge-replacement-bob-ortblad-711x400.jpg 711w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Large_Clark-County-Today-15358-interstate-bridge-replacement-bob-ortblad-150x84.jpg 150w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Large_Clark-County-Today-15358-interstate-bridge-replacement-bob-ortblad-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Large_Clark-County-Today-15358-interstate-bridge-replacement-bob-ortblad.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>A Seattle engineer questions whether hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent on a bridge design he argues is unnecessarily risky and costly compared to an immersed tunnel alternative. ]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/opinion/letter-has-450-million-been-wasted-on-a-bridge-thats-too-low-for-the-coast-guard-with-a-foundation-too-costly-to-build/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letter: Interstate Bridge Replacement Program – incompetence or corruption?</title>
		<link>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/opinion/letter-interstate-bridge-replacement-program-incompetence-or-corruption/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=letter-interstate-bridge-replacement-program-incompetence-or-corruption</link>
					<comments>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/opinion/letter-interstate-bridge-replacement-program-incompetence-or-corruption/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ClarkCountyToday.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 21:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Letters To The Editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geotechnical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. DOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Letter to the editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shannon and Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interstate Bridge Replacement program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max J. Kuney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Northwest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Portland Harbor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hayden Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ground improvement testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timber piles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bridge Investment Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilled shafts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keller North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foundation Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquefiable soils]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/?p=178433</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="300" height="160" src="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Large_Clark-County-Today-15122-bob-ortblad-ibr-letter-300x160.jpg" class="attachment-medium size-medium wp-post-image" alt="Bob Ortblad argues the IBR is overstating timber pile risks and misusing ground improvement testing on Hayden Island, raising concerns about competence and transparency." decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Large_Clark-County-Today-15122-bob-ortblad-ibr-letter-300x160.jpg 300w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Large_Clark-County-Today-15122-bob-ortblad-ibr-letter-750x400.jpg 750w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Large_Clark-County-Today-15122-bob-ortblad-ibr-letter-150x80.jpg 150w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Large_Clark-County-Today-15122-bob-ortblad-ibr-letter-768x410.jpg 768w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Large_Clark-County-Today-15122-bob-ortblad-ibr-letter.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>Bob Ortblad argues the IBR is overstating timber pile risks and misusing ground improvement testing on Hayden Island, raising concerns about competence and transparency. ]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/opinion/letter-interstate-bridge-replacement-program-incompetence-or-corruption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letter: IBR’s billion dollar risk, another Abernethy Bridge financial disaster?</title>
		<link>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/opinion/letter-ibrs-billion-dollar-risk-another-abernethy-bridge-financial-disaster/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=letter-ibrs-billion-dollar-risk-another-abernethy-bridge-financial-disaster</link>
					<comments>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/opinion/letter-ibrs-billion-dollar-risk-another-abernethy-bridge-financial-disaster/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ClarkCountyToday.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 23:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Letters To The Editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interstate Bridge replacement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge construction costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abernethy Bridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geotechnical report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge feasibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm Drilling Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boulder problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia River bridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineering challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction delays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge cost overruns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in-water work window]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seismic risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-5 Bridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilled shafts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Letter to the editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immersed tunnel alternative]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/?p=167537</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="300" height="169" src="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Large_Clark-County-Today-IBR-Billion-Dollar-Risk-Ortblad-300x169.jpg" class="attachment-medium size-medium wp-post-image" alt="Bob Ortblad raises concerns over the IBR project’s feasibility, comparing its costs to the Abernethy Bridge overruns and pointing to a hidden geotechnical risk." decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Large_Clark-County-Today-IBR-Billion-Dollar-Risk-Ortblad-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Large_Clark-County-Today-IBR-Billion-Dollar-Risk-Ortblad-711x400.jpg 711w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Large_Clark-County-Today-IBR-Billion-Dollar-Risk-Ortblad-150x84.jpg 150w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Large_Clark-County-Today-IBR-Billion-Dollar-Risk-Ortblad-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Large_Clark-County-Today-IBR-Billion-Dollar-Risk-Ortblad.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>Bob Ortblad raises concerns over the IBR project’s feasibility, comparing its costs to the Abernethy Bridge overruns and pointing to a hidden geotechnical risk.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/opinion/letter-ibrs-billion-dollar-risk-another-abernethy-bridge-financial-disaster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letter: ‘IBR’s seismic lie’</title>
		<link>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/opinion/letter-ibrs-seismic-lie/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=letter-ibrs-seismic-lie</link>
					<comments>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/opinion/letter-ibrs-seismic-lie/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ClarkCountyToday.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 22:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Letters To The Editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seismic design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilled shafts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interstate Bridge seismic risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earthquake resilience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge liquefaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil compaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niigata Bridge comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Letter to the editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-5 Bridge replacement]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/?p=165768</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="300" height="169" src="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Large_Clark-County-Today-ibr-seismic-risk-bob-ortblad-300x169.jpg" class="attachment-medium size-medium wp-post-image" alt="Engineer Bob Ortblad challenges the IBR Program’s claims about the I-5 Bridge’s seismic vulnerability, citing design concerns." decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Large_Clark-County-Today-ibr-seismic-risk-bob-ortblad-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Large_Clark-County-Today-ibr-seismic-risk-bob-ortblad-711x400.jpg 711w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Large_Clark-County-Today-ibr-seismic-risk-bob-ortblad-150x84.jpg 150w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Large_Clark-County-Today-ibr-seismic-risk-bob-ortblad-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Large_Clark-County-Today-ibr-seismic-risk-bob-ortblad.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>Engineer Bob Ortblad challenges the IBR Program’s claims about the I-5 Bridge’s seismic vulnerability, citing design concerns.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/opinion/letter-ibrs-seismic-lie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letter: The Interstate Bridge Replacement Program is hiding its ‘Geotechnical Data Report’</title>
		<link>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/opinion/letter-the-interstate-bridge-replacement-program-is-hiding-its-geotechnical-data-report/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=letter-the-interstate-bridge-replacement-program-is-hiding-its-geotechnical-data-report</link>
					<comments>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/opinion/letter-the-interstate-bridge-replacement-program-is-hiding-its-geotechnical-data-report/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ClarkCountyToday.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public disclosure request]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia River bridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geotechnical data report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geotechnical challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boulders and cobbles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge design issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilled shafts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interstate Bridge Replacement program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immersed tunnel alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hayden Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge construction costs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/?p=163009</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="300" height="169" src="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Large_Clark-County-Today-Bob-Ortblad-IBR-Geotechnical-Data-Hiding-300x169.jpg" class="attachment-medium size-medium wp-post-image" alt="Bob Ortblad critiques the IBR program for hiding a crucial geotechnical report." decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Large_Clark-County-Today-Bob-Ortblad-IBR-Geotechnical-Data-Hiding-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Large_Clark-County-Today-Bob-Ortblad-IBR-Geotechnical-Data-Hiding-711x400.jpg 711w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Large_Clark-County-Today-Bob-Ortblad-IBR-Geotechnical-Data-Hiding-150x84.jpg 150w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Large_Clark-County-Today-Bob-Ortblad-IBR-Geotechnical-Data-Hiding-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Large_Clark-County-Today-Bob-Ortblad-IBR-Geotechnical-Data-Hiding.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>Bob Ortblad critiques the IBR program for hiding a crucial geotechnical report.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/opinion/letter-the-interstate-bridge-replacement-program-is-hiding-its-geotechnical-data-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	<span class="ai-content"></span>
</channel>
</rss>
