<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bus on shoulder &#8211; ClarkCountyToday.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/tag/bus-on-shoulder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com</link>
	<description>Your News Source with Integrity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 17:36:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
<span class="ai-content"></span>
	<item>
		<title>Light rail cost and tax increase revelations cause significant concerns for C-TRAN Board</title>
		<link>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/light-rail-cost-and-tax-increase-revelations-cause-significant-concerns-for-c-tran-board/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=light-rail-cost-and-tax-increase-revelations-cause-significant-concerns-for-c-tran-board</link>
					<comments>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/light-rail-cost-and-tax-increase-revelations-cause-significant-concerns-for-c-tran-board/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ClarkCountyToday.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 02:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high capacity transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light rail departure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MAX light rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transit projections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farebox Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating and maintenance costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bus on shoulder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Express Bus service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark County transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light rail extension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxpayer funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-TRAN Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transit costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark County Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon and Washington taxpayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TriMet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales tax increase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interstate Bridge Replacement program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross river ridership]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/?p=163841</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="300" height="169" src="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Large_Clark-County-Today-light-rail-tax-cost-revelations-cct-300x169.jpg" class="attachment-medium size-medium wp-post-image" alt="C-TRAN Board raises concerns over TriMet’s demand for Washington taxpayers to cover $7 million in annual light rail costs for the IBR program." decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Large_Clark-County-Today-light-rail-tax-cost-revelations-cct-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Large_Clark-County-Today-light-rail-tax-cost-revelations-cct-711x400.jpg 711w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Large_Clark-County-Today-light-rail-tax-cost-revelations-cct-150x84.jpg 150w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Large_Clark-County-Today-light-rail-tax-cost-revelations-cct-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Large_Clark-County-Today-light-rail-tax-cost-revelations-cct.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>C-TRAN Board raises concerns over TriMet’s demand for Washington taxpayers to cover $7 million in annual light rail costs for the IBR program.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/light-rail-cost-and-tax-increase-revelations-cause-significant-concerns-for-c-tran-board/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>IBR adds new transit options for consideration to new bridge over Columbia River</title>
		<link>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/ibr-adds-new-transit-options-for-consideration-to-new-bridge-over-columbia-river/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ibr-adds-new-transit-options-for-consideration-to-new-bridge-over-columbia-river</link>
					<comments>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/ibr-adds-new-transit-options-for-consideration-to-new-bridge-over-columbia-river/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Ley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 18:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic congestion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freight mobility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seismic resilience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSDOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bus rapid transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hayden Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mass transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high capacity transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia River Crossing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[active transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TriMet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Transit Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interstate Bridge replacement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purpose and Need]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bus on shoulder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-205]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congestion relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-TRAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bi-State Bridge Committee]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/?p=111514</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="300" height="169" src="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/large_Clark-County-Today-IBR-adds-new-transit-options-for-consideration-to-new-bridge-over-Columbia-River-300x169.jpg" class="attachment-medium size-medium wp-post-image" alt="C-TRAN bus rapid transit is cheaper and could be faster for interstate transit service." decoding="async" srcset="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/large_Clark-County-Today-IBR-adds-new-transit-options-for-consideration-to-new-bridge-over-Columbia-River-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/large_Clark-County-Today-IBR-adds-new-transit-options-for-consideration-to-new-bridge-over-Columbia-River-150x84.jpg 150w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/large_Clark-County-Today-IBR-adds-new-transit-options-for-consideration-to-new-bridge-over-Columbia-River.jpg 711w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>C-TRAN bus rapid transit is cheaper and could be faster for interstate transit service.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/ibr-adds-new-transit-options-for-consideration-to-new-bridge-over-columbia-river/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interstate Bridge Replacement Program team moves three major design options forward</title>
		<link>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/interstate-bridge-replacement-program-team-moves-three-major-design-options-forward/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=interstate-bridge-replacement-program-team-moves-three-major-design-options-forward</link>
					<comments>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/interstate-bridge-replacement-program-team-moves-three-major-design-options-forward/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Ley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 22:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bus rapid transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSDOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Common Sense Alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tolling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lynn Valenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hayden Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tube tunnel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington State Transportation Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon State Transportation Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high capacity transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jo Ann Hardesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Regan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Fey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Portland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lynn Peterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan McLain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Rivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[active transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia River Crossing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Portland Harbor Bridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lynda Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharon Wylie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Vick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Build option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Transportation Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parametrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Advisory Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSP USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TriMet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Locally Preferred Alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seismic upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bus on shoulder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interstate Bridge Replacement program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-TRAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bi-State Bridge Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supplemental EIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freight mobility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lew Frederick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rose Quarter Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auxiliary lanes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/?p=104365</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="300" height="162" src="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/large_Clark-County-Today-Bridge-Crossing-and-Alignment-options-Oct-2021-300x162.jpg" class="attachment-medium size-medium wp-post-image" alt="The IBR Program team has narrowed down the options for a replacement Interstate Bridge. All are two level bridges, with bike and pedestrian traffic on the lower level. Two options are two separate structures and one is a single, larger structure. Graphic courtesy IBR Program" decoding="async" srcset="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/large_Clark-County-Today-Bridge-Crossing-and-Alignment-options-Oct-2021-300x162.jpg 300w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/large_Clark-County-Today-Bridge-Crossing-and-Alignment-options-Oct-2021-150x81.jpg 150w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/large_Clark-County-Today-Bridge-Crossing-and-Alignment-options-Oct-2021.jpg 739w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>Three major options for Interstate Bridge and numerous transit possibilities discussed by legislators.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/interstate-bridge-replacement-program-team-moves-three-major-design-options-forward/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mired in controversy — Rose Quarter project faces rocky road ahead</title>
		<link>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/mired-in-controversy-rose-quarter-project-faces-rocky-road-ahead/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mired-in-controversy-rose-quarter-project-faces-rocky-road-ahead</link>
					<comments>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/mired-in-controversy-rose-quarter-project-faces-rocky-road-ahead/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Ley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TriMet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Albina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon HB 2017]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon Transportation Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alando Simpson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland Public Schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rose Quarter Improvement Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harriet Tubman school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeway covers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No More Freeways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Hennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bus on shoulder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multnomah County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megan Channell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interstate 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nate McCoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-TRAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Posey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freight mobility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Holt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic congestion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Burch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Cortright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Albina Vision Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jana Jarvis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jo Ann Hardesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Witter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Highway Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restorative justice]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/?p=99252</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="300" height="160" src="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/large_Clark-County-Today-A-Options-for-cover-neighborhood-300x160.jpg" class="attachment-medium size-medium wp-post-image" alt="Community battles over width of freeway, design and ownership of highway cover for $1 billion Rose Quarter Project." decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/large_Clark-County-Today-A-Options-for-cover-neighborhood-300x160.jpg 300w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/large_Clark-County-Today-A-Options-for-cover-neighborhood-150x80.jpg 150w, https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/large_Clark-County-Today-A-Options-for-cover-neighborhood.jpg 750w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>Community battles over width of freeway, design and ownership of highway cover for $1 billion Rose Quarter Project.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/mired-in-controversy-rose-quarter-project-faces-rocky-road-ahead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	<span class="ai-content"></span>
</channel>
</rss>
