Study: Pfizer COVID shot converts into DNA in human cells

Contrary to the CDC's claim that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines do not "change or interact with your DNA in any way," a new Swedish study finds Pfizer's shot goes into liver cells and converts to DNA.
File photo

Findings conflict with CDC’s claim that vaccine never enters nucleus

Art Moore
WND News Center

Contrary to the CDC’s claim that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines do not “change or interact with your DNA in any way,” a new Swedish study finds Pfizer’s shot goes into liver cells and converts to DNA.

It’s the first time that researchers have shown in vitro – or inside a petri dish – how an mRNA vaccine is converted into DNA on a human liver cell line, the Epoch Times reported.

It’s precisely what health experts and fact-checkers said for more than a year could not occur.

Dr. Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist and epidemiologist who is one of the leading critics of the COVID vaccines, said the findings have “enormous implications of permanent chromosomal change” that could drive a “whole new genre of chronic disease.”

The CDC assures Americans that the mRNA and the spike protein it produces in COVID-19 vaccines to create an immune response “don’t last long in the body.” On its website, the agency states: “Our cells break down mRNA and get rid of it within a few days after vaccination. Scientists estimate that the spike protein, like other proteins our bodies create, may stay in the body up to a few weeks.”

Further, the CDC says on a web page titled “Myths and Facts about COVID-19 Vaccines” that the “genetic material delivered by mRNA vaccines never enters the nucleus of your cells.”

However, the researchers at Lund University in Malmö, Sweden, found that the mRNA vaccine enters human liver cells and triggers the cell’s DNA in the nucleus to increase the production of the LINE-1 gene expression to make mRNA.

The whole process occurred rapidly, within six hours, concluded the study, which was published by the university’s Department of Clinical Sciences.

Pfizer did not comment on the study’s findings, the Epoch Times reported, stating only that its mRNA vaccine does not alter the human genome.

“Our COVID-19 vaccine does not alter the DNA sequence of a human cell,” a Pfizer spokesperson told paper in an email. “It only presents the body with the instructions to build immunity.”

Earlier this month, as WND reported, a peer-reviewed study published in the prestigious journal Cell by researchers at Stanford University found that the spike protein created by the COVID vaccines remains in the body much longer than believed and at levels higher than those of severely ill COVID-19 patients.

The Stanford researchers tested the duration of the protein in the body for 60 days and found that it lasted at least that long.

Dr. Robert Malone, the key inventor of the mRNA technology platform that later was used in the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, described the implications of the Stanford study as a potential “health public policy nightmare” in an analysis on his Substack page.

The Swedish researchers also concluded the spike proteins expressed on the surface of the liver cells through the vaccine could target the immune system and possibly cause autoimmune hepatitis. They noted “case reports on individuals who developed autoimmune hepatitis” after getting the Pfizer shot.

The authors of the study cited the case of a healthy 35-year-old female who developed autoimmune hepatitis a week after her first dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. The researchers said there is a possibility that “spike-directed antibodies induced by vaccination may also trigger autoimmune conditions in predisposed individuals.”

Also read:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Receive comment notifications
Notify of
guest
130 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sylvia
Sylvia
4 months ago

Great news that the findings have now conclusively demonstrated the fact that the mRNA ‘vaccine’ can and does affect DNA. It surely is incorrect to call it a vaccine, when it is obviously a type of gene therapy. A vaccine delivers an antigen. The mRNA products turn the human body into a manufacturing plant of the SARS-Cov-2 spike protein. The repeated assurances from various government organizations on the safety and efficacy of the mRNA treatments are raising more and more doubts; all the more so because highly reputable scientists are deliberately discredited, vilified and silenced. Let’s hope the general public will start to think objectively and rationally sooner rather than later.

Cogitator X
Cogitator X
4 months ago
Reply to  Sylvia

This is from a well known crank and originally posted by World Nut Daily.
You’re being fed lies and misinformation in an attempt to erode your faith in your country and the scientific community.
You need to ask yourself what the purveyors of these lies have to gain and you better believe they don’t care about you beyond the $ they can get out of you.

Dr. James
Dr. James
4 months ago
Reply to  Cogitator X

Yep. Sites like this prey on those looking for positive confirmation and cite credible, but completely unrelated scientific journals, then completely fabricate a summary that fits the narrative they are pandering.

Mom
Mom
4 months ago
Reply to  Dr. James

Like what the Democrats spin ?

Fiachra Doyle
Fiachra Doyle
4 months ago
Reply to  Mom

Imagine these are the people that claim biological sex diesnt exist talking about how others don’t believe in science.

Fred Barnes
Fred Barnes
3 months ago
Reply to  Fiachra Doyle

Funny how Fiachra’s deflection comment gets a +26 rating but scientifically accurate comments that refute this badly written article get in the -20s.

Confirmation bias is a powerful thing.

Vicki
Vicki
4 months ago
Reply to  Mom

Science is not political. Try again.

NotPartOfTheFLOCK
NotPartOfTheFLOCK
4 months ago
Reply to  Vicki

No, Science just pays Politicans to back it’s monetary endeavors with public policy, you try again. These are the same people that have killed millions with the opiod epidemic. So Many Sheep in the US.

Joshua
Joshua
2 months ago

Ridiculous statement and more ridiculous was the lawsuit. People took opioids of their own free will and developed the addiction. The lawsuit is comparable to suing ford for car accidents. Ridiculous foolishness that is helping destroy the rule of law in this country

Hwjeje
Hwjeje
4 months ago
Reply to  Mom

You realize the vaccines were created introduced and supported by Trump

C. G.
C. G.
4 months ago
Reply to  Hwjeje

Supported, yes but created and introduced? No. He’s not a Doctor or a microbiologist.

Rob
Rob
3 months ago
Reply to  Hwjeje

Yes, but not forced on people with threats of losing your job, and being canceled, of course Trump hating liberal Fascist communist like you will blame Trump for everything, and you will line up for whatever your masters tell you!

Last edited 3 months ago by Rob
Johood
Johood
3 months ago
Reply to  Rob

Yes, Trump did not require people to take them like the sheep herding Demoncrats have done

Steve
Steve
4 months ago
Reply to  Dr. James

Are you even a doctor?
What’s your qualifications and area of expertise?

Dr. Engler
Dr. Engler
4 months ago
Reply to  Dr. James

And what ungodly sums, pray tell, do these sites make? Is it more than the 15.5 billion dollars in profit made by Pfizer last quarter?

MonaJay
MonaJay
3 months ago
Reply to  Dr. James

It’s obvious that Cogitators X and Dr. James are vaccinated and are scared crapless. We warned you from the beginning but we were called conspiracy theorists.

I bet you didn’t know that DNA can be found in the air too? These vaccinated people may be a danger to us.

This poison I will never take. Yaweh is our only protection now and forever more.

James
James
3 months ago
Reply to  MonaJay

Yaweh made doctors and scientists…..

Joshua
Joshua
2 months ago
Reply to  MonaJay

I am vaccinated and happily so. If it alters my dna, which it can not do (try doing more research than simply reading this article) However if it were to I’d be interested to see if it’s a harmful or beneficial change.

Dez nuts
Dez nuts
4 months ago
Reply to  Cogitator X

Cogitator x your a scientist?

NotPartOfTheFLOCK
NotPartOfTheFLOCK
4 months ago
Reply to  Cogitator X

and yet covid IS being withheld from public scrutiny… Anthony Fauci: ” I AM SCIENCE”. I science is allow to lie to Congress why do you think they not lying to you too?

Dr. Engler
Dr. Engler
4 months ago
Reply to  Cogitator X

So, you think the big money is being made by these poor scientists risking their livelihoods to blow the whistle on big pharma?

Glenn
Glenn
3 months ago
Reply to  Cogitator X

You obviously did not study advanced genetics and virology. Yes, mRNA is dangerous. Check out what happened when RSV vaccine containing mRNA failed and children died. It was removed immediately.

Aunge
Aunge
3 months ago
Reply to  Glenn

We need more virologists to come forward and explain this mRNA technology and the negative consequence of using it!

Joshua
Joshua
2 months ago
Reply to  Glenn

mRNA can be dangerous. As can anything injected into the body. Hence the research study trials and the face that it’s typically created and approved by drs as well as geneticists who know a lot more than I do. I do know one thing. I did not get COVID. Even when in the presence of someone who did.

Kathy Leneau
Kathy Leneau
3 months ago
Reply to  Cogitator X

You better believe this is true. The Epoch Times is also reporting it…

Susan
Susan
3 months ago
Reply to  Kathy Leneau

Fox also reported it tonight.

Tyler Gudan
Tyler Gudan
3 months ago
Reply to  Cogitator X

So let me get this straight. Anyone who is against the “vaccine” just wants my money, but somehow the people who want to force me to get an untested jab that is “free” (paid for by my tax dollars) somehow DON’T want any of my money and I should trust them completely?

Yeah, no logic there.

Tim
Tim
4 months ago
Reply to  Sylvia

Post shows a lack of scientific and research comprehension.

Alexis
Alexis
4 months ago
Reply to  Sylvia

Shut up! This is so bogus. You have no idea how incorrect this is! Lol “The Epoch Times”
Is the Enquire trash magazine equivalent for “science”
shake you idiotic head and do some proper research my god

Sean
Sean
4 months ago
Reply to  Alexis

Go away bot. The epoch times is regarded as one of the most unbiased and truthful publications there is.

Ayla
Ayla
4 months ago
Reply to  Sean

By whom? Most recent fact-checking and bias-analysis deems Epoch Times far-right, pro-Trump, pro-conspiracy and pushing pseudo-science. When they choose to share AP and Reuters stories, those are the fact-based articles, but it’s with editorial bias that they choose to publish them.

Chris C
Chris C
3 months ago
Reply to  Sean
Michael Bauers
Michael Bauers
4 months ago
Reply to  Alexis

To be clear, Epoch times reported on an actual study. The study is probably accurate. The question is, what is the study telling us? The cells in question were cancerous liver cells. In vitro, meaning outside the body. And sometimes these studies use an abnormal amount, in this case, of the mRNA vaccines. What we need is for trusted experts to assess what level of concern there is and such. What’s unfortunate, is journalists posting a dumbed down version of the study with no effort to give us context from experts in the field. Epoch times doesn’t care about educating us, they just want us to read the article, and hopefully be filled with alarm and hate, and hopefully keep reading Epoch Times. It’s sad IMO that journalism is all about click bait and polarizing people, and not about giving us the best possible information so we can make better decisions.

Chris C
Chris C
3 months ago
Reply to  Michael Bauers

Right on Michael. Those specific cells used in the lab were cancerous liver cells (not normal cells) and produced an enzyme that is also not normally present in normal liver cells. Here is a link to the actual study https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm. The conclusions differ significantly from those reported.

Don’t be a sheep
Don’t be a sheep
3 months ago
Reply to  Chris C

Can you please explain how the conclusions of that article (which I just read in its entirety) differ significantly from those reported?The article concludes with this (verbatim): “Our study is the first in vitro study on the effect of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 on human liver cell line. We present evidence on fast entry of BNT162b2 into the cells and subsequent intercellular reverse transcription of BNT162b2 mRNA into DNA.” Hmm, pretty straightforward to me.

Im not Branden
Im not Branden
3 months ago
Reply to  Alexis

And the Cartoon Network News CNN is gospel?
I think the hateful hypocritical liberals out there need a common sense vaccine asap.
Lets go Branden!

Fred Barnes
Fred Barnes
3 months ago
Reply to  Im not Branden

If you’re going to repeat the slogan, at least copy & paste it so you don’t misspell “Brandon.”

Also: “Let’s”

Sheesh!

Im not Brandon
Im not Brandon
3 months ago
Reply to  Fred Barnes

Fred,

As you suggested..
Let’s go Brandon 🙏
Thanks Bud..

Jerry

Last edited 3 months ago by Im not Brandon
Toe
Toe
4 months ago
Reply to  Sylvia

That’s not what this study says at all. It’s one study. Do in a Petri dish. Because they can force this to happen in a perti dish does not mean this is what is happening in your body. Hell they can reverse the age of a cell in a Petri dish. But it doesn’t mean immortality is a shot away. Also you don’t get the shot in the live nor does it migrate to the liver. It does it’s work in 48 hours using your arm muscles cells. Then it stops. Your natural immune system does the rest. I’m a medical scientist to point out that this is my knowledge base.

Sylvia
Sylvia
4 months ago
Reply to  Toe

Many thanks for your comment. Since, as you stated, in vitro and in vivo tests may differ, it is imperative to conduct in-depth research on any substance prior to prescribing any treatment – let alone mandating it to any sector of the community. Adverse events, no matter how rare, are not to be dismissed. The fact remains that there have been adverse events. As a medical scientist you undoubtedly know that current understanding of the human immune system is still in its infancy. The ability to create antibodies differ from person to person. It is known that an irritated immune system can result in cytokine storms or even autoimmunity, etc, etc.
Indeed, cellular/molecular biology, immunology and virology are truly fantastic subjects!
In a liberal democracy it is crucial to respect each person’s sovereign right to her/his body.
Hindsight, apologies and regrets do nothing to repair the damage.
I respect other people’s opinions, choices and decisions – just as I hope mine are respected.

Linda
Linda
4 months ago
Reply to  Toe

But what if you do not have a immune system at all? Someone is on a medication Paragraph because of having a liver transplant. Explain that!

Brian
Brian
4 months ago
Reply to  Linda

Even those with a transplant have an immune system. 🤦‍♂️

Dr. Engler
Dr. Engler
4 months ago
Reply to  Toe

I’m sorry you believed the unholy alliance of big pharma and the military/industrial alliance now known as the deep state. You do need however; to consider the studies that suggest opinions different than your own.

Katherine Brooks
Katherine Brooks
4 months ago
Reply to  Sylvia

There are lots of critisms of that study-it is in a petrie dish not the human body and the liver cell line used is a cancerous cell line-meaning that it is replicating faster than normal tissue cells do. So it is an extremely flawed study, also-mRNA is actually not capable of becoming DNA if you know anything about molecular biology.

Sylvia
Sylvia
4 months ago

Thank you for your reply. Agreed the experiment was in vitro using a liver cell – a little knowledge is better than zero, and this is very normal in any lab work. So much remains a question mark, open to conjecture, assumptions and the like. I do really appreciate it that many researchers are willing to openly share their findings, and risk vilification. I may agree, or disagree, with their results – but I respect them for what they do. Science used to be an exercise in interchange and collaboration, with changes happening non-stop. It is a pity that it has become so highly politicized in recent years.
As for molecular biology – one of my top favorite subjects, along with virology, immunology and neurology. A more recent one is epigenetics.
Please refer to my reply to Dr Tenebaum’s comment.
Thanks again!

Dr. Engler
Dr. Engler
4 months ago
Reply to  Sylvia

Thank you Sylvia for your cogent arguments that will some bright day in the future be held up as examples of brotherly love in your sincere efforts to inform a public that wishes to deny the truth and embrace a lie. Even when the lie is propagated by the very institutions responsible for the public health.

Sylvia
Sylvia
4 months ago
Reply to  Dr. Engler

Many thanks for your kind response and understanding Dr Engler. People like you prove that there is always hope that some day the world will focus more on the development of innate health rather than the maintenance of ‘dis-ease’. Please accept my heartfelt gratitude and appreciation.

Mike F
Mike F
2 months ago
Reply to  Sylvia

Since the article doesn’t specifically mention it, the study is probably this one –

Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line

They used a cancerous liver cell line (huh7) and indicate the following in the study-

“We detected high levels of BNT162b2 in Huh7 cells and changes in gene expression of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1), which is an endogenous reverse transcriptase.”

This means that the liver cells used in the study have the ability to transcribe RNA into DNA due to the presence of this reverse transcriptase which is not present in normal liver cells. They clearly state in the study that they were studying hepatic effects (effects in liver disease) and not effects in a healthy living being. 

 It is also an in vitro study which is intended to explore the possibility of an effect under controlled lab conditions before investing in a deeper study to explore the effect in a living environment.

Sylvia
Sylvia
2 months ago
Reply to  Mike F

Thank you, Mike F, for your comment. It is great to have open and rational interchange on these topics based on scientific facts.
The research was done in vitro, using diseased liver cells. My first thoughts were: could it also happen in diseased cells in other organs? What about healthy cells? What about mRNA to DNA transposons?
“There are some extremely rare exceptions. One is where genetic elements, known as retro-transposons, hijack cellular mRNA, convert it into DNA and insert that DNA back into your genetic material.
This has occurred sporadically throughout evolution, producing some ancient copies of mRNAs scattered throughout our genome, to form so-called pseudogenes.
Some retroviruses, such as HIV, also insert their RNA into our DNA, using similar methods to retro-transposons.”
There are a number of excellent papers that you may have read already, eg:

The paragraph below is of particular interest to me:
“The mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine induces complex functional reprogramming of innate immune responses, which should be considered in the development and use of this new class of vaccines.”
I find their research stimulating as well as thought provoking, since it places much needed focus on the immune system.
As you will undoubtedly know,
Interferons induce STING, which in turn activates a cascade of downstream factors, including STAT6 and IRF3, through the coding gene TBK1. Activation of the STING pathway leads to activation of both the innate and adaptive immune response, suppressing viral replication before it can cause damage.
My question is: do the mRNA Covid-19 vacc!nes actually impair the human immune system by inhibiting or reducing the ability to make inferon, thereby incapacitating the innate human response? You have to have that innate system for an antibody to work!
I am neither anti- or pro-vaccines. However, I believe that:

  1. it is best to err on the side of caution; and
  2. prevention is better than cure.

There are many who have not caught Covid-19 despite being unvaccinated. These people prefer to take the risk of catching the virus rather than the risks of the vaccine.
There are many who have been vaccinated (and boosted), yet still caught Covid-19, some repeatedly.
Personally I support freedom of choice based on open and factual scientific data.
Thus far there remain too many ‘unknowns’ about both the efficacy and the risks of the mRNA vaccines. For those reasons alone, it is wrong to mandate it in a country that once was “the cradle of democracy”.

Mike F
Mike F
1 month ago
Reply to  Sylvia

Sylvia, I am so happy that you also agree that “it is great to have an open and rational interchange on these topics (and I’m so glad you added-) based on scientific facts.”

Your next comment-
“My first thoughts were: could it also happen in diseased cells in other organs? What about healthy cells? What about mRNA to DNA transposons?”

As it turns out, two of the authors of the study have answered some of your questions, and others, after the study had been viewed over 800,000 times in just over a week.

https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/article/qa-covid-19-vaccine-study-gains-attention

The next part of your comment-
“There are some extremely rare exceptions. One is where genetic elements, known as retro-transposons, hijack cellular mRNA, convert it into DNA and insert that DNA back into your genetic material.
This has occurred sporadically throughout evolution, producing some ancient copies of mRNAs scattered throughout our genome, to form so-called pseudogenes.
Some retroviruses, such as HIV, also insert their RNA into our DNA, using similar methods to retro-transposons.”

The mRNA vaccines deliver mRNA into the cell but not into the nucleus of the cell where the nuclear DNA exists. It’s my understanding that the biomolecular machinery necessary to convert DNA or RNA into a form that can be inserted back into the cellular DNA has to be present within the nucleus to affect such genetic changes within a cell. Also, our cells normally create mRNA within the nucleus through a multi-stage process and transport it out of the nucleus via a one way process that doesn’t allow mRNA back into the nucleus. The mRNA vaccines lack the necessary components to transport it (mRNA) back into the nucleus, but viruses- including Covid-19- do have and depend on that capability. That’s how a virus works. It makes it’s way, all the way, to the nucleus and uses the normal cellular function to produce more viruses.

The papers you referenced, published on a pre-print server, don’t call into question the efficacy of the pfizer vaccine, but do suggest that a possiblility of reduced efficacy of additional vaccinations, such as the seasonal flu vaccine.
From that paper-

BNT162b2 vaccine is clearly protective against COVID-19, but the duration of this protection is not yet known, and one could envisage future generations of the vaccine incorporating this knowledge to improve the range and duration of the protection. Our findings need to be confirmed by conducting larger cohort-studies with populations with diverse backgrounds, while further studies should examine the potential interactions between BNT162b2 and other vaccines.”

As you say-

  1. it is best to err on the side of caution;
  2. prevention is better than cure.

My perspective-

  1. Being cautious means weighing hazard and risk against mitigation or inaction.
  2. The idea of vaccination is to prevent before needing to cure.

“There are many who have not caught Covid-19 despite being unvaccinated. These people prefer to take the risk of catching the virus rather than the risks of the vaccine.”

That’s a tall risk. Millions have died.

“There are many who have been vaccinated (and boosted), yet still caught Covid-19, some repeatedly.”

The evidence clearly shows that the vaccinated have faired far better in terms of severity of infection and long term side effects.

“Personally I support freedom of choice based on open and factual scientific data.”

So do the experts. But they also wish the non-experts had the necessary ability to evaluate the factual scientific data to make a truly informed choice.

Thus far there remain too many ‘unknowns’ about both the efficacy and the risks of the mRNA vaccines. For those reasons alone, it is wrong to mandate it in a country that once was “the cradle of democracy”

You don’t have to get a vaccination. If your employer requires one, you can find a different employer.

Paulina
Paulina
4 months ago

Seems like the “experts” and “fact checkers” have been wrong about COVID an awful lot. Not good! Article says “in vitro” so better start checking DNA of people who got the shots.

Cogitator X
Cogitator X
4 months ago
Reply to  Paulina

This article is full of misinformation pushed by a crank and a far right propaganda site. Learn to think critically. You’re being lied to.

Tim
Tim
4 months ago
Reply to  Paulina

Do you really understand what in vitro really means?

Brian
Brian
4 months ago

Shoddy journalism. Malone is a well-known purveyor of Covid misinformation.

Paulina
Paulina
4 months ago
Reply to  Brian

Malone! Scary! Bad! Pay no attention to the study! Malone! Malone! LOL

Tim
Tim
4 months ago
Reply to  Paulina

Do you really purport you have a scientific understanding of the study?

Paulina
Paulina
4 months ago
Reply to  Tim

Do you?

Paulina
Paulina
4 months ago
Reply to  Tim

Plus, my point was that all you guys do is hop around and complain about Malone. Malone didn’t even DO the study. He just commented on it. Big effing deal!
The study is in a Petri dish, “in vitro.” As I mentioned above, seems like it’s something they could check in human DNA. If you’ve got anything to add to that, then by all means… give some details. Just leave out anything about Malone. It wasn’t his study, and I couldn’t care less that he commented on it. His name is just a distraction, so..,go ahead…explain the study.

Mom
Mom
4 months ago
Reply to  Paulina

Thank you Paulina and Sylvia

Idok
Idok
4 months ago
Reply to  Brian

He invented the mRNA technology you fools

Dr. Tenebaum
Dr. Tenebaum
4 months ago
Reply to  Idok

He published some papers on the possibility of protein synthesis mRNA in humans. All of his experiments failed to produce practical results, however.

He’s a smart doctor, but he’s making far more money misinforming the public, and he has a bone to pick. Don’t believe his lies.

scott spencer
scott spencer
4 months ago

That’s NOT what the study stated. This site is fraudulent.

Susan
Susan
3 months ago
Reply to  scott spencer

Sure it is just like the vaccine doesn’t cause the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis. I bet you believe that too! The FDA has now enforced a black box warning label on Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson that there is in fact a risk of myocarditis and pericarditis. They should have done that before all the people that died from heart failure after receiving the jab! Even though the warning is now on the insert, people still try and argue and say it isn’t true. Makes no difference to me, because I’m not a sheep. If a person wants to inject this crap into their body, that is there choice to do so, but to demand that someone else does it, or else there will be a consequence is BS, and actions of a communist dictator. Last time I checked I thought I was living in America, with freedom of choice!

scott spencer
scott spencer
3 months ago
Reply to  Susan

Myocarditis unfortunately is a immune response. It occurs from vaccines just as well natural occurring Covid response. So it is not so much a vaccine response but an immunity response.

Cogitator X
Cogitator X
4 months ago

This site just posts the most blatantly false rightwing conspiracy theories making the rounds amongst the kool aide drinkers.

Jeff
Jeff
4 months ago

eye Roll.
from the beginning that is exactly how they said it worked…
inject mnra which enters your cells,
the mNRA then gets your cells machinery (which is controlled by DNA) to produce the “spike protein”. The mNRA is used up/degrades and is gone and has no effect on your dna.

that has been the basic explanation from the beginning.
basic science. Why all this confirmation bias? A slightly different wording of the mechanism and what? More conspiracy crap? Give me a break

Shawn Miller
Shawn Miller
4 months ago

I was twice arrested and Baker Acted for no mask/Vaccine. #CoronaFraud destroyed my life.

I am #Unmasked for 2 years.
I am #Unvaccinated for 2 years. 
I am #Untested for 2 years. 
I am #Unemployed for two years.

I worked in sewers from March to July 2020 with no mask. Nobody got sick. Nobody died. Tampa Bay to Port Charlotte in Florida.

James 1:8
A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.

Spiritual Carnal 
Heavenly Worldly
Eden Babylon 

All my life, war was in between my ears.
I always knew something was right.
I never knew there truly was a facade on earth.
Family, friends, & Church said go with the flow.
Get an education, get married, get a career, raise a family, settle down, grow roots, & live happily ever after.

JESUS said follow ME, lose your life, deny self, & love not the world.

Now, all things are coming to the ultimate climax in Revelation. Yet, spiritual blindness remains. “Christian” people fail to see, hear, & understand the times. 

My Uncle & Aunt, Mother & Brother are all vaxed, masked, & scared to death of this #CoronaFraud. 
Uncle got double shots, & boosted last year. His cancer blew up in the last 4 months. They have put their faith in Science & Doctors. 

Foolish Galatians & Babylonian Christians won’t make it. Lot’s Wife did not make it.

I am persuaded COVID:Certification Of Vaccination Identification. Revelation 6 White Horse, COVID has conquered the world through fear. This is the forerunner to Revelation 13 antichrist beast system. 

To die is to be present with THE LORD. Why be afraid? Tomorrow is not promised. You need a test to tell you that you are sick? Who told you that you are sick? You Trust your Government? The same Government that rebelled against Romans 13 taxes at Boston Tea Party? The same Government that lied & stole from Native Americans? The same Government that Enslaved Africans? The same Government that had Jim Crowe Segration laws? The same Government that killed JFK? The same Government that poisoned it’s soldiers with Agent Orange? The same Government that wants to mandate vaccination to be employed?

#OperationPaperclip
#OperationMockingbird
#OperationNorthwoods
#OperationCHAOS
#OperationLockstep
#Event201
#Agenda21
#Agenda2030
#Agenda2050

Wake-up Ostriches 
Ichabod To The Laodicean satanic 501C3 Church

“Media companies should commit to ensuring that authoritative messages are prioritized and that false messages are suppressed including through the use of technology” — Event 201

Dr James
Dr James
4 months ago
Reply to  Shawn Miller

Right on brother.
The moment you own it, you better never let it go
You only get one shot, do not miss your chance to blow
This opportunity comes once in a lifetime
You better
His soul’s escaping, through this hole that is
#gaping
This world is mine for the taking
Make me king, as we move toward a #NewWorldOrder
A normal life is borin’, but super stardom’s close to post mortem
It only grows harder, only grows hotter
He blows, it’s all over, these hoes is all on him
Coast to coast shows, he’s known as the
#Globetrotter
Lonely roads, God only knows, he’s grown farther from home, he’s no father
He goes home and barely knows his own daughter
But hold your nose ’cause here goes the cold water

Alexis
Alexis
4 months ago
Reply to  Shawn Miller

Please just got lock yourself up you wacko. Freak show you are

Dr. Engler
Dr. Engler
4 months ago
Reply to  Alexis

Maybe you need to consider why the weakness of your arguments require you to make ad hominem attacks.

Cazadora
Cazadora
4 months ago
Reply to  Shawn Miller

Omg Religion are you out of your mind, obviously

Kristin Winnekens
Kristin Winnekens
4 months ago
Reply to  Shawn Miller

100% couldn’t of said it better myself!

Dr. James
Dr. James
4 months ago

Huh? I looked at the research paper linked in the article, but it was not even close to the same content this article claims. Are you hoping to just post highly technical scientific papers that most people don’t understand, then claim it backs up whatever agenda you like?
Also, Epoch Times is not a credible source as they are severely biased.
What else you got?

Paulina
Paulina
4 months ago
Reply to  Dr. James

Are you going to explain the study to us? Maybe you are the one who doesn’t understand it.

Dr James
Dr James
4 months ago
Reply to  Paulina

Spoken like a true hero. “Someone else please think for me! You didn’t explain it to me, so you probably don’t understand it!”
Here you go cupcake:
It looks at the differences between various types of vaccines, as well as the natural immune response to an infection. Or is THAT too complicated? Want it boiled down more?
It. Doesn’t. Even. Contain. The. Word. DNA. Once.
So jog on.

Last edited 4 months ago by Dr James
Paulina
Paulina
4 months ago
Reply to  Dr James

Here’s the study link, honey.
https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm#B39-cimb-44-00073
Prior to HIV and AIDS, scientists thought DNA transcription was a one way street, DNA codes to RNA. But HIV uses an enzyme, Reverse Transcriptase, that lets an RNA virus embed in your DNA. That process is called Reverse Transcription. The study, which is mentioned in the headline to this article and mentioned in the Epoch Times article, looks at the Pfizer vaccine in a Petri dish with liver cells. DNA is obviously mentioned multiple times in the study. Sorry. Here is one example for you… “BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA as fast as 6 [hours] after BNT162b2 exposure.”

Ed
Ed
4 months ago
Reply to  Paulina

Thanks for your intellectual response to the quack MD. J.

MonaJay
MonaJay
3 months ago
Reply to  Paulina

They used HIV to make the vaccine. Something tells me that they did this for the reverse transcribe effect to take place in humans. They are evil.

They want to patent humans. Devils.

Fred Barnes
Fred Barnes
3 months ago
Reply to  Paulina

How about we let some of the study’s AUTHORS tell you that its findings are misinterpreted?

Lots of science here, but the more accessible parts start roughly at:
The viral [as in ‘big on social media’] posts omit the next sentence, which explicitly states, “At this stage, we do not know if DNA reverse transcribed from BNT162b2 is integrated into the cell genome.”

“The claim made on social media is false, and distorts the findings from the study,” he said in an email to AAP FactCheck.

“The Lund study does not show that the vaccine mRNA enters the human nucleus at all. It only shows that reverse transcription of the mRNA has happened.”

Two authors of the Lund University study, Associate Professor Yang de Marinis and Professor Magnus Rasmussen, have also released a Q&A in response to the attention their work has generated on social media.
“The results have in many cases been misinterpreted,” they said.
“This study does not investigate whether the Pfizer vaccine alters our genome,” de Marinis confirmed.
Prof Rasmussen also stated: “There is no reason for anyone to change their decision to take the vaccine based on this study.”
The study was conducted in a laboratory on cells in a petri dish, which is not the same as a study on human subjects because “cell lines differ from cells in living organisms,” Rasmussen wrote.

https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/a-swedish-study-did-not-say-covid-vaccine-changes-human-dna/

Michael
4 months ago

All the mRNA people. Just hope it’s false, Even if it is true they won’t believe it. For Thames can not change what they have done to them self. Unvaccinated will be saving the Vaccinated’s Life’s. With there Blood , Vaccine Inducing Autoimmune Disease. HIV ,= Suboptimal Immune Response

Erkel
Erkel
4 months ago

Holy crap! Stop already. Don’t write about crap you don’t understand. Yes, in a Petri dish with reverse transcriptase RNA can enter the nucleus and incorporate into DNA. So don’t inject yourself with reverse transcriptase!

Fred Barnes
Fred Barnes
3 months ago
Reply to  Erkel

Agreed, but it’s painfully obvious the majority of comments are from people who don’t understand things like reverse transcriptase, in vivo vs in vitro, and the cellular location of transcription.

I know nothing about aeronautical engineering, but I think I’ll go find an article and complain about it on a website because that’s apparently a thing these days.

Ron
Ron
4 months ago

LOL. Right up top the title states “Today.com your news source with integrity.” Then you folks post this drivel.

Paulina
Paulina
4 months ago
Reply to  Ron

You guys can’t explain the study? Just name calling and pearl clutching. Malone! Malone!

Ron
Ron
4 months ago
Reply to  Paulina

That’s no study. It’s idiocy. It’s posted for idiots.

Paulina
Paulina
4 months ago
Reply to  Ron

First, the fact that all you’ve got is name-calling just shows how weak your argument is. Second, the article talks about two studies. Here are the links for you so you can evaluate them yourself:
https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm#B39-cimb-44-00073 (Pfizer mRNA vaccine transcribes into liver cell DNA in vitro)
https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(22)00076-9? (Spike protein antibodies from various vaccines mover around in the body and stay there for much longer than we were told). Happy reading….

F-u
F-u
4 months ago

Lol the person who wrote this didn’t even bother to read the study or they just linked a random one and hoped no one would read it. This is blatant misinformation and it’s sad no one checks sources nowadays

Paulina
Paulina
4 months ago
Reply to  F-u

And I’m sure the author loves that you guys give his articles so much attention! Still can’t help but noticing…not one single negative commenter said a single thing explaining what was wrong in the article. Not one! Everyone whining that the author doesn’t understand what he’s talking about. But no one offering any evidence. Big Pharma troll farms seem to be running out of ammo. Same old same old. Article is talking about two studies. Which one has the misinformation? Please explain!

  1. mRNA turns to DNA in liver cells in a Petri dish.
  2. Spike protein stays in the body at high levels for at least 60 days (length of the study)
Fred Barnes
Fred Barnes
3 months ago
Reply to  Paulina

Here you go. These AUTHORS talk about how their findings have been misinterpreted on social media: https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/a-swedish-study-did-not-say-covid-vaccine-changes-human-dna/

B lake
B lake
4 months ago

Garbage!

Sylvia
Sylvia
4 months ago

Thank you for sharing your opinions, they are varied and most interesting. 
I am neither pro-, nor anti-, vaccine. 
It is important to make an effort to maintain objectivity, and to respond rather than react – particularly when it concerns matters of health. That is the approach I have practised throughout the years. Scientists like Dr Peter McCullough, Dr Robert Malone, and countless others, have made an effort to share their knowledge based on their education and research. Each person is entitled to an opinion – there is no need, however, to cast dispersions on people or things or aspects that are different. Mutual respect and equality get far better results than aggression or insults.

In a new peer-reviewed study by researchers at Stanford University it was found that the spike protein created by the COVID vaccines remains in the body much longer than believed and at levels higher than those of severely ill COVID-19 patients.
The Stanford researchers tested the duration of the protein in the body for 60 days and found that it lasted at least that long.
A study published in Cell quantitatively measured spike protein levels in plasma post-vaccination. It also found that the levels are higher than the levels observed in a person with a severe COVID-19 infection. The persistence of the synthetic spike protein in lymph node germinal centers is a matter for more in-depth research.
Typically, vaccines use a live virus that has been attenuated, or weakened; the messenger RNA ‘vaccines’, however, deliver laborary-created genetic material that instruct cells how to produce the spike protein, which then prods the body’s immune system to produce antibodies – so the theory goes.
The use of a modified chemical called pseudouridine to encode the spike protein, and unique nanoparticles to deliver the mRNA ‘vaccine’ also require much more detailed research to ascertain what it does inside the body, particularly over the long term.
Those are but a few of the myriad aspects of the mRNA ‘vaccine’ that have thus far eluded detailed, factual explanation. For scientists they provide challenges that are impossible to ignore.
Thanks again for you time you gave and effort you made to share your thoughts.
We can all learn from one another.

Sylvia
Sylvia
4 months ago

For those who may be interested, below are details of the original paper.

“Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line”.
by Markus Aldén 1, Francisko Olofsson Falla 1, Daowei Yang 1, Mohammad Barghouth 1, Cheng Luan 1, Magnus Rasmussen 2 and Yang De Marinis 1,*
1.Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, 20502 Malmö, Sweden
2.Infection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, 22362 Lund, Sweden
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Stephen Malnick
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44(3), 1115-1126; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44030073
Received: 18 January 2022 / Revised: 19 February 2022 / Accepted: 23 February 2022 / Published: 25 February 2022.

I found it most informative and, yes, definitely well presented. It is obvious that the long-term effect(s) of the mRNA ‘vaccine’ require further research at both the cellular and molecular levels.

Jay
Jay
4 months ago

Tell me you are a failing journalist without telling me you’re failing.

Paulina
Paulina
4 months ago
Reply to  Jay

Or HOW you are failing. You guys always leave out the HOW. Looks like Sylvia laid it out for you. HOW does the article/study fail?

Fred Barnes
Fred Barnes
3 months ago
Reply to  Paulina

It’s not really that the article fails; it’s what happened after social media types with an agenda and people whose biology education consists of high school + Marvel movies got a hold of it.

The authors comment on misinterpretation here. And this will be the last time I post it on this page because I’ve done it enough.

https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/a-swedish-study-did-not-say-covid-vaccine-changes-human-dna/

Vanessa. N
Vanessa. N
4 months ago

I already know that the mRNA affects the DNA as the mRNA(messenger) write the code to the DNA and needs amino acids to work properly.
It’s in my book I study to work in health care. Ive been sick from the mRNA vaccine and currently waiting on testing, my lungs have been affected, ive become allergic to everything, especially alcohol. I had to quit my job and now looking for answers. The Sputnik vaccine is an adenovirus vaccine that works differently, yet it was never consider in north America, now there’s a plant base vaccine. So what is truly the real deal/vaccine. Here comes more health issues to deal with. They don’t even know what they do in a lab. It’s the kids I worry about. What have they done to their genetics, no one talks about what Gene/chromosome was the target for this mRNA.

Paulina
Paulina
4 months ago
Reply to  Vanessa. N

Sorry to hear your vaccine-related health problems, Vanessa. Search articles on “Spike Protein Detox.” I think the Frontline Doctors group might have a protocol. Epoch Times has some good articles on it too, either in their health or mind-body sections.

Fred Barnes
Fred Barnes
3 months ago
Reply to  Paulina

Okay, but please do 2 minutes of research into Americas Frontline Doctors.

Or don’t. Confirmation bias is “in” these days. Why look at opposing viewpoints, right?

Sylvia
Sylvia
4 months ago
Reply to  Vanessa. N

Hello Vanessa, it is unfortunate that you have suffered so much. I have seen many people who, like you, have gone through debilitating effects through no fault of their own. In desperation an increasing number have resorted to integrative treatments that seek to combine the best of western and other remedies. Personally I have always been interested in understanding what remedies are available – being myopic or dogmatic is not for me, neither is a rigid mindset nor cognitive inflexibility.
You may be interested in checking out the websites of:

  1. Orthomolecular Medicine;
  2. DoctorYourself;
  3. Big Bold Health.

the above are free, and run by MD’s and PhD’s around the globe.
Dr Mark Hyman MD is also a Functional Medicine Practitioner, and has been highly praised for his work.
The above have been recommended by many over the years, and I often visit the sites – nothing to lose!
My own approach to healing has always been a ‘personalized’ one, because each person is different and the ‘one size fits all’ symptoms-based treatment is far from successful. Moreover, I like to get to the root cause of an illness, ie not just the symptoms; particularly since the body functions as an integrated whole, where no cell or molecule or organ can work in isolation.
Please stay positive, give your body the respect that it deserves, and it will look after you. Keep your immune system strong, and it will help fend off pathogens. You are taking responsibility for your health, and that is fantastic.
All the very best towards a healthier you!

MonaJay
MonaJay
3 months ago
Reply to  Vanessa. N

Most likely it will affect fertility and he ability to connect to God. World economic forum had a conference about a chemical or something to stop connection of feeling connected toward God. You gotta search for it in google it’s there. These people are literallY infested with demons driving their every move.

Vanessa. N
Vanessa. N
4 months ago

My liver was also affected, my toe started to swell on the left foot. I had to take a plant base liver health formula in one week my toe was better. Milk thistle, tumeric, dandelion, dl-alpha-lipoic acid, artichoke, black radish and blessed thistle. Thats what is in the formula that I took. So yes, depending on the individual, it will affect their liver also BLOOD TYPE is important and should be looked at. I also was diagnosed with an autoimmune disaster years ago but my doctor and work told me I had to get the vaccine to work. Now I am sick. I am allergic to all nightshade plants and it’s become worst with the vaccine and food that I am allergic to also.

Alice Strummel
Alice Strummel
4 months ago

And our government and many employers forced it on us.

Dr. Tenebaum
Dr. Tenebaum
4 months ago

This study comes from an unreviewed open publish website called MDPI. This hasn’t been proven to be true in any case, and it would be incredibly surprising if it was.

Reverse transcription is a well-known process where the mRNA will infiltrate the cell, and change the DNA. This is only seen in retroviruses, and it requires the reverse transcriptase enzyme, which isn’t present in the vaccine RNA.

Before claiming this as true, I strongly suggest waiting until these studies are peer-reviewed and published in a reputable journal.

Sylvia
Sylvia
4 months ago
Reply to  Dr. Tenebaum

Great comment! Thanks for sharing.
Below are abstracts of papers that may be of interest – in case you have not come across them.
Needless to say, the authors are highly reputable researchers. No quackery in any way whatsoever.

Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19
Stephanie Seneff1 and Greg Nigh2
1Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge MA, 02139, USA, E-mail:
seneff@csail.mit.edu
2Naturopathic Oncology, Immersion Health, Portland, OR 97214, USA
ABSTRACT
“Operation Warp Speed brought to market in the United States two mRNA vaccines, produced by Pfizer and Moderna. Interim data suggested high efficacy for both of these vaccines, which helped legitimize Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the FDA. However, the exceptionally rapid movement of these vaccines through controlled trials and into mass deployment raises multiple safety concerns. In this review we first describe the technology underlying these vaccines in detail. We then review both components of and the intended biological response to these vaccines, including production of the spike protein itself, and their potential relationship to a wide range of both acute and long-term induced pathologies, such as blood disorders, neurodegenerative diseases and autoimmune diseases. Among these potential induced pathologies, we discuss the relevance of prion-protein-related amino acid sequences within the spike protein. We also present a brief review of studies supporting the potential for spike protein “shedding”, transmission of the protein from a vaccinated to an unvaccinated person, resulting in symptoms induced in the latter. We finish by addressing a common point of debate, namely, whether or not these vaccines could modify the DNA of those receiving the vaccination. While there are no studies demonstrating definitively that this is happening, we provide a plausible scenario, supported by previously established pathways for transformation and transport of genetic material, whereby injected mRNA could ultimately be incorporated into germ cell DNA for transgenerational transmission. We conclude with our recommendations regarding surveillance that will help to clarify the long-term effects of these experimental drugs and allow us to better assess the true risk/benefit ratio of these novel technologies”.
Keywords: antibody dependent enhancement, autoimmune diseases, gene editing, lipid nanoparticles, messenger RNA, prion diseases, reverse transcription, SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research 2(1), May 10, 2021

“SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome”
Liguo Zhang, Alexsia Richards, Andrew Khalil, Emile Wogram, Haiting Ma, Richard A. Young, Rudolf Jaenisch
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.12.422516
“Prolonged SARS-CoV-2 RNA shedding and recurrence of PCR-positive tests have been widely reported in patients after recovery, yet these patients most commonly are non-infectious114. Here we investigated the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome and that transcription of the integrated sequences might account for PCR-positive tests. In support of this hypothesis, we found chimeric transcripts consisting of viral fused to cellular sequences in published data sets of SARS-CoV-2 infected cultured cells and primary cells of patients, consistent with the transcription of viral sequences integrated into the genome. To experimentally corroborate the possibility of viral retro-integration, we describe evidence that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse transcribed in human cells by reverse transcriptase (RT) from LINE-1 elements or by HIV-1 RT, and that these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed. Human endogenous LINE-1 expression was induced upon SARS-CoV-2 infection or by cytokine exposure in cultured cells, suggesting a molecular mechanism for SARS-CoV-2 retro-integration in patients. This novel feature of SARS-CoV-2 infection may explain why patients can continue to produce viral RNA after recovery and suggests a new aspect of RNA virus replication”.

In order to preserve medical ethics it is best to avoid dogmatism, ie keep an open mind and never subject any patients to any risk of harm, potential or otherwise. Primum non nocere!

Mike F
Mike F
1 month ago
Reply to  Sylvia

Stephanie Seneff and Greg Nigh are certainly not “highly reputable researchers” as stated. Seneff has a history of flashing her MIT credentials around on subjects she lacks the necessary expertise in. A computer science degree doesn’t make you an expert in biology, immunology, genetics or medicine. She does have a talent for establishing correlations, though never makes the convincing step to establish causation.
Apparently, Greg Nigh has no valid credentials or training in any field relevant to this topic.
The papers they co-authored are opinion pieces, not studies, based on unsubstantiated correlations.

Zypo
4 months ago

I read the study. It Doesn’t seem to claim what this article claims it does. It NEVER claims vaccines alter DNA. The study explores the differences between natural immunity and vaccination. It states that the high spike protein presence could lead to immune imprinting. Which is immunity against a wider spread of variants.

I’m not sure why the writer thinks the cited study supports the claim that vaccines alter DNA. Maybe the writer of this article thought that immune imprinting was some form of DNA modification. Maybe they didn’t read the article and simply assumed it backed their claim

Fred Barnes
Fred Barnes
3 months ago
Reply to  Zypo

Right. It’s their playbook:

  1. Find a study published somewhere, anywhere.
  2. Use lots of technical jargon in your interpretation of that article.
  3. Ignore facts that don’t support your interpretation (eg, where transcription actually takes place, in vivo vs in vitro, reverse transcriptase, normal vs transformed cells…)
  4. Take comfort in the fact that few will question your findings. Of those who do, very few have the technical background to form cogent arguments.

The fact that your comment currently has a negative six (-6) rating is both unsurprising and troubling.

ObjectiveConsent
ObjectiveConsent
4 months ago

Your really one of the only ones reporting this so soon. I’m trying to get the word out myself but I’m just a guy.

Vicki
Vicki
4 months ago

This was in vitro with Huh7 liver cell lines that came from a tumor. This is NOT In-Vivo. Seems like a big lie of pseudoscience to think it’s “altering DNA or entering the nucleus”.

James
4 months ago

There is no excuse for touting your opinions, if you haven’t read the article and understood the facts. “Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line” https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm
“…BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h…

Fred
Fred
4 months ago

Doctor Robert Malone invented this mRNA process and early on warned not to use it on human subject’s! If you can’t believe the inventor of the process and his warnings then go out and get your multiple boosters, your voice will soon be silent! And the human gene pool will be better for it!

William Antonian
William Antonian
4 months ago

I have studied the virus and vaccine on my own and knew within the first 3 months that this could happen. I don’t understand why more people didn’t see it.

Dez
Dez
4 months ago

Dr. Robert Malone, the key inventor of the mRNA technology. Thats a bold claim that has been debunked over and over again. It was collaboration of scientists NOT ONE SOLE INVENTOR. misleading

Jonas M
Jonas M
3 months ago

Art Moore, are you intentionally misleading people or do you just not bother to actually understand the science you are reporting on?
You are the prime example of lack of scientific literacy leading to huge jumps in conclusions and misunderstanding.
The study only measured reverse-transcription in cells, meaning Pfizer mRNA was re-coded into DNA, but it requires a lot more for that DNA to be re-integrated into the cell genome (what is called RETRO-TRANSPOSITION, which this study found zero evidence for). In fact, most RNAs in a cell are probably reverse transcribed to DNA due to random interactions, but this by now way means that DNA is being put back into the genome as DNA…
You really should consult experts about studies when you have a terrible understanding of the science… Articles like this are the reason people are so misinformed… please redact this, its just wrong.

Fred Barnes
Fred Barnes
3 months ago
Reply to  Jonas M

Man, it’s like you’re preaching to the deaf. Confirmation bias is strong here.

Most people commenting here have poor science skills. That’s to be expected. But one would expect more from the writer.

The fact that your post currently has a -8 rating is a sad commentary on readers of this page.

…now it’s a -7. 🙂

Chris C
Chris C
3 months ago

I read the paper in discussion. It does not say what the article claims it says. Never trust an article that does not link you to the source paper. Here, I’ll do that for you all (some of you are not industrious enough to do it yourselves) https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm

Janet Ward
Janet Ward
3 months ago

My companion has read a lot in this area while studying the causes and actions of MS. This confirms the concern he has had all along with mRNA vaccines.

Fred Barnes
Fred Barnes
3 months ago
Reply to  Janet Ward

Good, a reader! Ask him to now read the authors’ take on how their study has been misinterpreted on social media: https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/a-swedish-study-did-not-say-covid-vaccine-changes-human-dna/

Linda
3 months ago

CDC IS IN LINE WITG WHO….UN….THE GREAT RESET…..NWO. I believe -zero- from CDC….FDA…AND WHO.

Fred Barnes
Fred Barnes
3 months ago
Reply to  P Culb

They don’t want facts here. They want whatever misinformation will support their agenda.

Sylvia
Sylvia
3 months ago

Thank you, Art Moore, for sharing this research paper. It has generated such widely divergent comments. Just great!

Whilst mRNA may not change DNA, it may alter gene expression.
Epigenetics is a key mechanism that regulate gene expression. Our lifestyle is a major determinant how our genes are expressed.  
Genes do not determine destiny.
DNA methylation is but one mechanism that cells use to regulate which genes are actively expressed or suppressed.
A genetic predisposition for a disease, for example, can be counterbalanced by an appropriate healthy lifestyle that modulates the epigenome of the affected tissues. It is clear that there is a high level of individual responsibility for living a healthy lifestyle to maintain health. Understanding epigenetics provides this life philosophy from the molecular perspective.
Three classes of epigenetic regulation are known to date: DNA methylation, histone modification, and noncoding RNA action.
DNA is the same from cell to cell and remains unchanged. Tiny molecules, like methyl groups, are attached to the DNA backbone to regulate which genes are actively being transcribed into RNAs and translated into proteins. DNA methylation is essential in the control of gene functions or expressions.
Epigenetics is a change in phenotype that does not involve a change in the nucleotide sequence in the DNA per se, ie a change in genotype. This is a very basic definition.
A genotype refers to the genetic characteristics of an organism. 
A phenotype refers to its physical characteristics. For example, having green eyes (an autosomal recessive trait) is a phenotype; missing the gene for brown eyes is a genotype.
Thus a phenotype is the set of observable characteristics of an individual, caused by the interaction of its genotype with the environment, particularly a person’s lifestyle.
The ‘plan’demic has made the world even more divisive than ever before, and also far more intolerant. Having people at each others’ throats is often used by many as a strategy to ‘divide and conquer’. Sad but true.
Mandates rule our opinions, our daily activities, and even tell us what we are allowed to think. These measures confine us to exist in a box where everything is defined as either black or white – nothing in between. Life is not limited to black and white. We do have the ability to see more colors and process multiple aspects. 
It takes an objective mindset and lots of practice to overcome the initial discomfort that may arise when we begin to learn how and why others have come to conclusions that differ from ours. We do not have to agree with any of them. However, this simple exercise will help us to accept the real world in all its nuances, and see that there are more colors than just black and white.
It will help us reassess, refine, and reformulate our own biases and opinions.
Most importantly, we will learn the skills to appreciate diversity and how to help create a more harmonious world.

Sylvia
Sylvia
3 months ago

Fantastic news, in case you have not seen it.

The request by the FDA to have 75 years before releasing Pfizer clinical data on the Covid-19 mRNA vaccine was, thankfully, refused by a Judge. Consequently the first 55,000 pages have now been released – they make compelling reading. Very revealing, enlightening, and extremely worrying.
Better still, no science or medical degree is needed to get the gist of its contents, specifically the myriad of adverse events.
To me the revelations confirm the serious concerns that numerous scientists have raised since the early days of the ‘plan’demic. Most concerning indeed!
It will take approximately 8 months for all the data to be made public – as per the Judge’s order. Stay tuned!

The question is: why do some people get Covid-19, but others do not get it at all or, if they do, they recover naturally. I believe that the difference lies in the immune system, ie innate and adaptive. A robust immune system protects the terrain from attacks. It most certainly does not need any reprogramming by vaccines or pharmaceuticals. Current understanding of this highly intricate system is, at best, in its infancy.
Is it luck? Absolutely not.
Is it genetic? Epigenetics is the answer.
Healthy lifestyle? Most definitely.
No molecule, no cell, no organ in the body functions in isolation, simply because they are a wholly integrated system.

Surely it is preferable to have a life that is symptom-free and prescription-free. To be on medications for life must be extremely depressing and lacking in quality.

Let’s take better care of our body by giving it the respect that it deserves. The world will be a better place for it.

Fred Barnes
Fred Barnes
3 months ago

It’s 2022. A website that invites discussion needs to have a way to flag SPAM.

Milton Farrow
3 months ago

It appears that the possibility of criminal mischief here is at play and this needs to be stopped immediately and if guilty THE PFIZER PEOPLE NEED BE CHARGED WITH
INTENTIONAL HOMICIDE FOR PROFIT

Keep Looking
Keep Looking
3 months ago

Ya know that the study used liver cancer cells growing in the laboratory, which aren’t representative of healthy cells or a human being.
Come on, people, we have to be smarter than this.

Yvette Rivera
Yvette Rivera
3 months ago

So now what will we do with all these millions of people around the world, who may have had an ounce of protection, but will now most likely develop an autoimmune disease?

RUkiddingme
RUkiddingme
3 months ago

How are you going to post this wacky conspiracy theory crap on a community web page?
Deeply unprofessional. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-epoch-times/

Joshua
Joshua
2 months ago

Perhaps there should have been a more controlled trial. Group a of 100 or so people given the vaccine kept in location a though allowed out to do normal daily activities and group b all same standards but no vaccine. 1 & 3 month sickness, infection, and mortality rates. With 6month 1 year 2 year long term effect studies.

I’m alive today. I was not sick yesterday, and I am also okay with masks. Why you ask. Because I didn’t even catch a cold during all of this. How awesome is that.

I know of another independent study that was done on methamphetamine users. Not one regular user was sickened by COVID. Not that I suggest the use of amphetamines however it’s a basis for future studies on what chemical protected or killed the virus.