<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: ‘Light rail to nowhere’? Surging costs undercut I-5 bridge transit plan	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/light-rail-to-nowhere-surging-costs-undercut-i-5-bridge-transit-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/light-rail-to-nowhere-surging-costs-undercut-i-5-bridge-transit-plan/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=light-rail-to-nowhere-surging-costs-undercut-i-5-bridge-transit-plan</link>
	<description>Your News Source with Integrity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 14:51:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Peter Bracchi		</title>
		<link>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/light-rail-to-nowhere-surging-costs-undercut-i-5-bridge-transit-plan/#comment-52058</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Bracchi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 14:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/uncategorized/light-rail-to-nowhere-surging-costs-undercut-i-5-bridge-transit-plan/#comment-52058</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As a retired project manager, I do not see a scandal here. I see a mayor running into the hard wall of project reality.

Big projects are controlled by three things: scope, budget, and schedule. When the cost doubles, the scope does not magically stay the same. Something has to give. That is not failure. That is basic project management.

The Interstate Bridge replacement is now a $14.4 billion megaproject. There is not enough money to build every promise, every add-on, and every local political wish in the first phase. At that point, adults either freeze the scope and move the project forward, or they keep chasing bells and whistles until the whole thing bogs down again.

That is the real issue here. Not whether one more Vancouver station would be nice. Of course it would. The issue is whether leaders understand the difference between a long-range vision and a funded deliverable.

Mayor Anne McEnerny-Ogle may be frustrated, but frustration does not create funding. Complaining that the project is not delivering the full dream right now does not change the budget math. This is a multi-state bridge replacement, not a city wish list.

The responsible move is obvious: build the core bridge project, preserve the ability to extend rail later, and stop pretending every feature belongs in Phase 1 when the money is not there.

What the public should worry about is not that the project is being scaled back. The real danger is that political pressure and unrealistic expectations will once again bury a critical bridge replacement under scope creep, delay, and cost inflation.

At some point, leadership means accepting constraints.

Build the bridge. Protect the future option. Quit selling fantasy as if it were funded reality.

That is not giving up. That is finally managing the project.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a retired project manager, I do not see a scandal here. I see a mayor running into the hard wall of project reality.</p>
<p>Big projects are controlled by three things: scope, budget, and schedule. When the cost doubles, the scope does not magically stay the same. Something has to give. That is not failure. That is basic project management.</p>
<p>The Interstate Bridge replacement is now a $14.4 billion megaproject. There is not enough money to build every promise, every add-on, and every local political wish in the first phase. At that point, adults either freeze the scope and move the project forward, or they keep chasing bells and whistles until the whole thing bogs down again.</p>
<p>That is the real issue here. Not whether one more Vancouver station would be nice. Of course it would. The issue is whether leaders understand the difference between a long-range vision and a funded deliverable.</p>
<p>Mayor Anne McEnerny-Ogle may be frustrated, but frustration does not create funding. Complaining that the project is not delivering the full dream right now does not change the budget math. This is a multi-state bridge replacement, not a city wish list.</p>
<p>The responsible move is obvious: build the core bridge project, preserve the ability to extend rail later, and stop pretending every feature belongs in Phase 1 when the money is not there.</p>
<p>What the public should worry about is not that the project is being scaled back. The real danger is that political pressure and unrealistic expectations will once again bury a critical bridge replacement under scope creep, delay, and cost inflation.</p>
<p>At some point, leadership means accepting constraints.</p>
<p>Build the bridge. Protect the future option. Quit selling fantasy as if it were funded reality.</p>
<p>That is not giving up. That is finally managing the project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Ley		</title>
		<link>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/light-rail-to-nowhere-surging-costs-undercut-i-5-bridge-transit-plan/#comment-52001</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Ley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 00:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/uncategorized/light-rail-to-nowhere-surging-costs-undercut-i-5-bridge-transit-plan/#comment-52001</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The &quot;light rail to nowhere&quot; is appropriate for the entire $3.5 billion transit boondoggle. That is roughly 25% of the entire project cost. It never should have been included to begin with.

The 1.83 mile extension of the MAX Yellow Line is ridiculous. It only travels 14 mph. It can only carry about 1,000 people an hour (15 minute departures). If they manage to fill the train with passengers, most will be standing. NOBODY wants to travel 14 mph; NOBODY wants to stand for a 35-40 minute ride into downtown Portland.

The $3.5 billion price tag for light rail is a total ripoff of taxpayers. It&#039;s shoveling billions towards financially bankrupt TriMet, who is cutting service. They recently said they would run out of money in 2029 if they don&#039;t get another financial bailout. Oregon taxpayers just killed a $4.3 billion transportation tax proposal -- every single county REJECTED the tax increases.

The current IBR proposal does NOTHING to fix the problem people want resolved -- reducing traffic congestion and saving people time. It&#039;s time to fire the over-paid consultants and clean house.

We need an affordable transportation proposal that actually saves people travel time by reducing traffic congestion!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;light rail to nowhere&#8221; is appropriate for the entire $3.5 billion transit boondoggle. That is roughly 25% of the entire project cost. It never should have been included to begin with.</p>
<p>The 1.83 mile extension of the MAX Yellow Line is ridiculous. It only travels 14 mph. It can only carry about 1,000 people an hour (15 minute departures). If they manage to fill the train with passengers, most will be standing. NOBODY wants to travel 14 mph; NOBODY wants to stand for a 35-40 minute ride into downtown Portland.</p>
<p>The $3.5 billion price tag for light rail is a total ripoff of taxpayers. It&#8217;s shoveling billions towards financially bankrupt TriMet, who is cutting service. They recently said they would run out of money in 2029 if they don&#8217;t get another financial bailout. Oregon taxpayers just killed a $4.3 billion transportation tax proposal &#8212; every single county REJECTED the tax increases.</p>
<p>The current IBR proposal does NOTHING to fix the problem people want resolved &#8212; reducing traffic congestion and saving people time. It&#8217;s time to fire the over-paid consultants and clean house.</p>
<p>We need an affordable transportation proposal that actually saves people travel time by reducing traffic congestion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
