<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Hayden Island interchange options down to two for Interstate Bridge replacement	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/hayden-island-interchange-options-down-to-two-for-interstate-bridge-replacement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/hayden-island-interchange-options-down-to-two-for-interstate-bridge-replacement/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hayden-island-interchange-options-down-to-two-for-interstate-bridge-replacement</link>
	<description>Your News Source with Integrity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2022 20:12:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: pete		</title>
		<link>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/hayden-island-interchange-options-down-to-two-for-interstate-bridge-replacement/#comment-12172</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2022 20:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/?p=113157#comment-12172</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/hayden-island-interchange-options-down-to-two-for-interstate-bridge-replacement/#comment-12131&quot;&gt;janice whitehead&lt;/a&gt;.

Entry traffic, even low volume, just before a natural slow down (e.g. entering the bridge) creates congestion. Hayden Island traffic (both north and south) should be routed via Marine Drive and the interchanges there. New lanes (northbound) should be created with the Marine drive onramp -- that could &quot;peel off&quot; for the WA 14 exit on the north end of the bridge. Likewise, lanes added for WA 14 onramp southbound on bridge could &quot;peel off&quot; at the Marine Drive exit. 

Study the I-205 bridge as an example. Lanes are created where WA 14 enter and then decrease at the PDX exit (southbound). A similar lane addition/reduction occurs northbound between PDX onramp and WA 14. Of course, (at this late date), I-205 would benefit greatly with an extra lane (or 2) each way between I-84 and PDX.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/hayden-island-interchange-options-down-to-two-for-interstate-bridge-replacement/#comment-12131">janice whitehead</a>.</p>
<p>Entry traffic, even low volume, just before a natural slow down (e.g. entering the bridge) creates congestion. Hayden Island traffic (both north and south) should be routed via Marine Drive and the interchanges there. New lanes (northbound) should be created with the Marine drive onramp &#8212; that could &#8220;peel off&#8221; for the WA 14 exit on the north end of the bridge. Likewise, lanes added for WA 14 onramp southbound on bridge could &#8220;peel off&#8221; at the Marine Drive exit. </p>
<p>Study the I-205 bridge as an example. Lanes are created where WA 14 enter and then decrease at the PDX exit (southbound). A similar lane addition/reduction occurs northbound between PDX onramp and WA 14. Of course, (at this late date), I-205 would benefit greatly with an extra lane (or 2) each way between I-84 and PDX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: janice whitehead		</title>
		<link>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/hayden-island-interchange-options-down-to-two-for-interstate-bridge-replacement/#comment-12131</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[janice whitehead]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2022 19:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/?p=113157#comment-12131</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/hayden-island-interchange-options-down-to-two-for-interstate-bridge-replacement/#comment-12129&quot;&gt;Allen Smith&lt;/a&gt;.

Massive merging from Delta Park &#038; Marine DR/MLK slow northbound.  Traffic moves faster at bridge approach where there is a trickle merging from island in comparison.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/hayden-island-interchange-options-down-to-two-for-interstate-bridge-replacement/#comment-12129">Allen Smith</a>.</p>
<p>Massive merging from Delta Park &amp; Marine DR/MLK slow northbound.  Traffic moves faster at bridge approach where there is a trickle merging from island in comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Allen Smith		</title>
		<link>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/hayden-island-interchange-options-down-to-two-for-interstate-bridge-replacement/#comment-12129</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allen Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2022 18:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/?p=113157#comment-12129</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Has this planning team actually driven this stretch of highway?

The Hayden Island onramp is the &lt;strong&gt;cause&lt;/strong&gt; of a great deal of the northbound congestion stretching back for miles. It&#039;s too close to the bridge and too close to the SR-14 offramp. Drivers intending to exit onto 14 position themselves in the right lane prior to the Hayden Island onramp, putting themselves into contention with slow merging traffic. By the time you get onto the actual bridge, the traffic quickly speeds up to 40–50 mph, even at peak rush hour.

A local-access bridge with a beefier Delta Park interchange has always been the obvious solution to the actual congestion problem. It would be nice if this bridge were being designed to alleviate corridor congestion, instead of a sop to Hayden Island!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has this planning team actually driven this stretch of highway?</p>
<p>The Hayden Island onramp is the <strong>cause</strong> of a great deal of the northbound congestion stretching back for miles. It&#8217;s too close to the bridge and too close to the SR-14 offramp. Drivers intending to exit onto 14 position themselves in the right lane prior to the Hayden Island onramp, putting themselves into contention with slow merging traffic. By the time you get onto the actual bridge, the traffic quickly speeds up to 40–50 mph, even at peak rush hour.</p>
<p>A local-access bridge with a beefier Delta Park interchange has always been the obvious solution to the actual congestion problem. It would be nice if this bridge were being designed to alleviate corridor congestion, instead of a sop to Hayden Island!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Margaret		</title>
		<link>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/hayden-island-interchange-options-down-to-two-for-interstate-bridge-replacement/#comment-12127</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2022 04:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/?p=113157#comment-12127</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;span&gt;Data from an independent review panel hired by the governors of Washington and Oregon indicated the cost of the I-5 bridge with  light rail formerly called the  Columbia River Crossing, CRC,  project was closer to $10 Billion. With inflation gapping up, the costs will be higher now.  Underestimating costs, and overestimating transit ridership were hallmarks of the failed CRC plan. Tolling and debt were keys to the financial plan, and discussion of toll and debt was avoided then as it is now.  &lt;/span&gt;
We need more bridges to keep freight moving in our region, as well as commercial and other traffic, a new east side bridge, and a west side bridge. Therefore, any I-5 Bridge project must be economically designed. Gold plated light rail requires so many $, and so much land for so few people, 1-2% of trips across the bridge. Not a good value by any measure.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Data from an independent review panel hired by the governors of Washington and Oregon indicated the cost of the I-5 bridge with  light rail formerly called the  Columbia River Crossing, CRC,  project was closer to $10 Billion. With inflation gapping up, the costs will be higher now.  Underestimating costs, and overestimating transit ridership were hallmarks of the failed CRC plan. Tolling and debt were keys to the financial plan, and discussion of toll and debt was avoided then as it is now.  </span><br />
We need more bridges to keep freight moving in our region, as well as commercial and other traffic, a new east side bridge, and a west side bridge. Therefore, any I-5 Bridge project must be economically designed. Gold plated light rail requires so many $, and so much land for so few people, 1-2% of trips across the bridge. Not a good value by any measure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
