<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Democrat lawmaker: No broad-based tax relief for Washingtonians	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/democrat-lawmaker-no-broad-based-tax-relief-for-washingtonians/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/democrat-lawmaker-no-broad-based-tax-relief-for-washingtonians/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=democrat-lawmaker-no-broad-based-tax-relief-for-washingtonians</link>
	<description>Your News Source with Integrity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 18:00:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Susan		</title>
		<link>https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/democrat-lawmaker-no-broad-based-tax-relief-for-washingtonians/#comment-16785</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 18:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/?p=130662#comment-16785</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is another example of why I&#039;ve nearly given up on participaton in the legislative process. I&#039;ve written &#038; communicated with SW Washington elected officials for the past several years. And though I often get well-meaning and thoughtful responses, the end result is always the same... it&#039;s the democrats&#039; way or the highway.

The majority leader quoted in this article flat out says there will be no broad-based tax relief. Despite there being a surplus in the budget, or despite there being valid arguments otherwise, there will be no tax relief because the democrat majority says so. There is absolutely no middle-ground here in Wash. State. None whatsoever.

How about a smaller-than-desired tax reduction in property taxes?  Maybe that reduction could sunset in a specified time frame? Maybe there could be a one-time rebate check sent to property owners? Maybe seniors 65+ could have property taxes frozen for a period of time, with forgiveness of the increases that occur in the interim?  But, no, the democrats&#039; way of thinking is simply &quot;no tax reductions, only increases.&quot;

Why would any person or business, if given a choice, ever choose to come to Wash. State?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is another example of why I&#8217;ve nearly given up on participaton in the legislative process. I&#8217;ve written &amp; communicated with SW Washington elected officials for the past several years. And though I often get well-meaning and thoughtful responses, the end result is always the same&#8230; it&#8217;s the democrats&#8217; way or the highway.</p>
<p>The majority leader quoted in this article flat out says there will be no broad-based tax relief. Despite there being a surplus in the budget, or despite there being valid arguments otherwise, there will be no tax relief because the democrat majority says so. There is absolutely no middle-ground here in Wash. State. None whatsoever.</p>
<p>How about a smaller-than-desired tax reduction in property taxes?  Maybe that reduction could sunset in a specified time frame? Maybe there could be a one-time rebate check sent to property owners? Maybe seniors 65+ could have property taxes frozen for a period of time, with forgiveness of the increases that occur in the interim?  But, no, the democrats&#8217; way of thinking is simply &#8220;no tax reductions, only increases.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why would any person or business, if given a choice, ever choose to come to Wash. State?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
